MI_Mumps wrote:
Funny that they were wrong on both picks…
I suspected that their claim about people being notified the day before was off (too long of an embargo to keep the cat in the bag) and that at least one of their picks might be off as well. They did guess the Spanish team right, but yeah.
McDowell and McElroy were kind of interchangeable, I think the McDowell might be a slightly better relay pick (which is honestly their best hope at a medal, outside of the ladies race), although McElroy would probably be better in the individual race, given that he has shown better at the WTS level... KZ make sense as a pick, if you go off her body of work, and overall consistency as being one of the top in the world. Shitty for Spivey, because she did all of the right things to make it a hard choice, and has shown better in the last year than KZ has, but the last nail in her selection coffin was Knibb's qualification in Yokohama... I didn't see an official announcement of alternates for the US, my assumption is that it's McElroy and Spivey as first alternates.
We'll probably start to see more confirmations coming out of selections over the next week, although Australia is waiting until the last moment, to keep looking at form of their athletes before finalizing picks.
I'll come out and make a prediction right now though, while there are 17 relays who are now in for Tokyo, It's unlikely that all 17 will start (I'd predict it'll be closer to 15), either from people not recovering from the individual race, or from injuries/illness/crashes. teams are limited in their recourses, in that they can't change their athletes as of two days before the games, and then can only pick their team from who they have there, which in most cases is 2 and 2 (those with 3 on either side have a bit more flexibility to absorb that, so I suspect that those 6 countries will start for sure, but the others is where the attrition is likely).