ChandlerMyles wrote:
Would you contribute to the fundraiser, say $10 for every full 140.6 she does in 50 days with the stipulation that she gets tested for performance enhancing drugs and passes at the end of the 50 days?
I would totally throw that cash down.
Given the nature of the claim and the casual attitude towards understanding "an ironman", I'd need a hefty degree of certainty around her completion of the actual distances. Also, I'd still be torn, because I don't want to encourage people to attempt (or claim they'll attempt) things that are way over their head or they may not actually intend to complete or start just for fame or fundraising. Want to raise money through Ironman? Great! There are charity slots, and you an get others to donate based on their completion of the distance. You don't need to say you'll do 50.
I mean, if I said I'd run across the USA in a month for charity, would you donate because I made a stupid, crazy claim to attract attention to my charity? I'd rather charity money go to people who set realistic (even if very difficult) goals and achieve them rather than to people who make absurd claims and fail to deliver.
The point is, ladies and gentleman, that speed, for lack of a better word, is good. Speed is right, Speed works. Speed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.