BobAjobb wrote:
Some interesting info out today in the UK and the reasoning behind it.
Form the government's chief scientific officer and the chief medical officer (so not just Bullsh1t Boris, but actual clever guys).
And i can assure you (a) I'm cynical to politician speak, and (b) I'm hardly a fan on BS Boris.
Why not close schools (at the moment at least) - vital stat was that to be effective it would need 13-16 WEEKS shutdown and kids kept apart. And keeping kids apart for 16 weeks has zero possibility.
+ likely 'unforseen consequence'? Kids go to grandparents for care etc as parents working. Result? Exactly tjose you're trying to protect have a much INCREASED risk of getting it due to the new increased disease pools from the kids.
In the Seattle area we just closed all k-12 schools till April 24th... so they are giving at least the short term closure a try (my kids school has already been closed for over a week so it will be about 8 weeks total of no school. And yes.. the kids still move around but the idea is the number of people they contact each day is less than all being in school + family + activities.
______________________________________________
Team Zoot