Ron_Burgundy wrote:
cartsman wrote:
T3_Beer wrote:
When the contenders decide they want to get rid of GVA, they will. It's just a matter of time......Great ride from him today though, always good to see riders result respecting the yellow jersey. Hell of a ride from Alaphilippe as well!
Perfect day for a breakaway, non mountain top finish, early sprint point, generally an "easy" day. Uran is clearly done, Valverde was getting gapped off today, he will be done tomorrow. Majka/Zakarin also getting dropped today. If you get dropped today you are for sure not hanging on tomorrow.
Tomorrow will likely be the first test, 108km day, with a tough climb out of the gate. If your sky, tomorrow is the perfect day for a serious attack early, its either up or down all day. Conversely, Sky might simply control the pace all day to set up Thursdays final climb as their moment to take over the race. I do suspect that Sky would rather have Froome take the lead then deal with Thomas taking the lead. With the current situation they are effectively down one rider until this is sorted out. Alpe d'Huez is a perfect climb for Froome and the more i think about it he will likely target that climb. Thomas can often fake it for two weeks, but then fades.
I agree. Especially now with only 8 man teams instead of 9. Last year Thomas crashed out and effectively made them an 8 man team, but there is no Mikel Landa on their team this year. The longer Thomas is allowed to race for himself, the more pressure there is on the other 6 guys on Sky to lead an effective train. I really like Poels as a guy who can step up, but he also did a shit ton of work as Froome's lieutenant at the Giro. Maybe Bernal? But he seems more of a punchy climber rather than a hard tempo guy...and he's unproven in a GT.
If the Sky train weakens without Thomas working as the lieutenant, then that opens up far more opportunity for the rest of the GC guys to attack. And that doesn't favor Froome or Thomas who rather ride a consistent hard tempo rather than constant attacks, slowing, etc.