tomdefietsbom wrote:
turdburgler wrote:
grumpier.mike wrote:
Carl Spackler wrote:
Cav made some interesting comments about wishing he hadn’t left to take more coin; who knows, he might have that TdF win record had he stayed put. Kittel, Vermote, Viviani and a long list of others are thinking the same thing.
I have always wondered if old Pat L is a witch doctor or something. It just seems like anyone leaving QuickStep is doomed to suck at their new team.
haha he might. His philosophy on how he runs that team is the secret sauce (along with a keen eye for talent that can fill a specific role). I just wish he would STFU already on any topic ;)
Not a chance, he is being paid to do a weekly column by a Belgian paper, so any time there is something slightly controversial in there, it'll be picked up in other media as well.
The people leaving is such a myth.
Cancellara left the team, Cav didn't immediately suck after leaving (as wordl champion he got a lead out by yellow jersey Wiggins to a win on the Champs-Elysees which was pretty cool), ...
The nain thing that changed is having less chances to profit from teammates in the front of a race. People like Terpstra, Knaven, Devolder, ... might have gotten their biggest wins simply to that factor.
To be fair, Cancellara left when he was quite young (at least by the standard back then).
That said, you are right about the likes of Terpstra and Devolder, the rouleurs who really need to rely on teamwork in order to work others over. I'd actually add Chavanel to that category as well, and he almost bagged De Ronde. None of them is a top-class favorite, but in the right circumstances (specifically, when their top-class favorite teammate neutralizes everyone else), they can still win a big race.
Think of it this way, GvA probably could beat both Terpstra and Devolder head-to-head, but both Terpstra and Devolder have one more Monument victory than GvA does.