Quote:
Quote:
Hi Ian, could I get your size thoughts on my numbers as well!
When looking at the Speedmax CF SLX, I seem to not necessarily fit well on any of them.
Stack - 64.5cm
reach (centre of pads) - 48cm
saddle height - 72.8
When I look at the charts, it looks like a small has a pad stack range of 566-619, so that won't work.
A medium has a pad stack range of 595 - 648, so just barely makes it?
The medium has a saddle height range listed as 727 - 857, so apparently I'd literally be on the limit of getting my saddle low enough, and obviously puts a large out of range with a 761 min saddle height.
Am I just a bad fit for Canyon?
Thx!
SBRcanuck, You are reading the prescriber correctly and I would argue that even getting the medium to 648 is a bummer because it requires an aftermarket item to lift you even further than the max of all the normal pieces. Are you a bad fit for a Canyon? No. This particular Canyon Speedmax SLX is a long and low bike and you need more of a longish and and taller bike. The Canyon Speedmax CF in a medium fits you VERY well. And, I've only been looking at the new numbers on the new disc brake Speedmax for 20min so I need more time to be sure but it looks like you'd fit on that bike well too.
Ian
Hey Ian, just wondering if we could revisit this for the CF SLX as the geo charts seem different now in terms of the stack ranges.
My measurements are still pretty much the same as above..
My low saddle height maybe makes sense with a small, but the reach maybe a medium but not sure the medium would work with my saddle height, still seems too low to be in range...
Also, one other concern - with the size small frame, if I calculate the front center (not listed on their chart) by subtracting wheelbase from chainstay length, that gives a front center of 56.6cm.
My current 54cm Felt IA that fits well has a FC of 60.2cm. So the front wheel of the small Canyon seems like it would be 4cm firther back, major toe overlap and sharp handling??
SBRcanuck,
Yeah, this convorsation started some time ago (rim brake) so it does seem like a good time to revisit (disc brake).
I'm still working from Pad Y of 645 and Pad X 430 (to rear of pad), Seat Height of 728. You could fit on either the SM or Med
If you got the medium...short stem, pads back 100%, low spacer +~10mm, medium extension, seat post very low so one of the bottle boses would be in frame*
If you got the small...short stem, pads could go 10mm farther fwd and ~25mm farther back, mid spacer +~5mm, medium extension, and seat post high enough to expose both bottle boses*
*Canyon has an OEM water bottle that can be mounted on the back of the seat post if both bosses are exposed. Not everybody like this bottle holder so some use the a thrid party, behind-the-saddle cage device of which there are many. Even if the boses are exposed I can't say that it's easy to acquire a Canyon cage. All of this might be moot becuase you may have a strong opinion on the aesthetics of how much seat post should be exposed.
As to the Front Center.... the math isn't as easy as subtract Chain Stay from Wheel Base and get Front Center. There's some aspect of Bottom Bracket Drop that mucks up that equation. I don't know this well enough to nail it (and it requires a triganometry calculation that this English major is absolutley not gonna get near) but as I speak to bicycle builders/engineers/designers I know that the Speedmax has a long chain stay (size small Speedmax 420, size small IA 408), long like gravel bike long, so long that the Speedmax would do extremely well as a 1x and this plus the wheel base make the Speedmax more stable and not sharp in handling. As to toe overlap all I can tell you is that even with cleats back 100% for tri and so many fits through my studio that's not a common problem on the Speedmax.
Ian
Ian Murray
http://www.TriathlonTrainingSeries.com I like the pursuit of mastery
Twitter - @TriCoachIan