Derekl wrote: "I don't think you understand where the burden of proof lies here, Frank. YOU have stated that lower HR (along with 18 other variables) is your goal, so YOU have the burden to prove that this will lead to faster race times. Where is YOUR supporting evidence for that?
If it were anybody other than Dave, I'd feel bad for them for listening to you without questioning a thing. What exactly are your qualifications for any of this?”
No, you don’t understand. THERE IS NO BURDEN OF PROOF ON MY PART! This is a triathlon forum. Dave and I are simply relating what we are doing and the results we have found. If everyone in the world required proof of something before trying something new then nothing would ever change. I have put forth my rational as to why I would expect that improved efficiency (lower HR for the same power) might improve racing performance (more power for the same HR/effort) but it is all theoretical. You proposed that HR doesn’t make a whit of difference and I just asked you if you had any support for that idea. Of course you don’t because there isn’t any. One of the benefits of going to school and study is one can apply what they learn to solving real world problems. My main area of concern is pedaling efficiency. I know of one way to improve efficiency. I believe this is another and the results so far seem to support that view. That is what I am attempting to do here. Those who think efficiency unimportant should just ignore what we are doing.
My qualifications. I have both a pretty good academic background that allows me to understand both human physiology (MD) and engineering principles (Naval Academy - nuclear engineer) have spent many years thinking about and studying how muscles produce power pedaling and how to improve that efficiency. Many believe the results I have seen to be impossible. My ideas go against the ingrained beliefs of many “gurus." So be it. I know what I know and I know what I have seen and experienced. No one else has my combination of academic background and experience. Those who want to dismiss my ideas should give well reasoned arguments rather than ad hominem attacks. I am capable of change. My thoughts in this area are substantially different than they were just a few years ago as I have gained more experience. Hopefully, some researchers someday will take these ideas and put them to the test to either prove or disprove these musings (are you listening Bio McGeek?). I am sure my beliefs will be different 5 years from now. One thing I was taught in medical school - Half the stuff they were teaching was wrong, they just didn’t know which half. That applies to pretty much everything in life.
So, again, this is simply a triathlon forum. Dave started by simply reporting what we are doing. The title was an unfortunate one but did reflect part of the end goal. Since my appearance I have been trying to educate the rational as to why. You are free to ignore or, perhaps, this might stimulate some self reflection regarding your own racing. Your choice. If you demand proof before you will consider this then I will fail as it is not possible. Hardly anything you do in cycling has been proved yet you still do it. What I am doing is based purely on theoretical concerns and, so far, the results seem positive, at least to Dave and me.
I might add that this has taken a lot longer than it should have. This is because we have had to take baby steps. First, I had to gather the data to disabuse Dave of the believe that he needed longer cranks to ride in the mountains. Only then could we really start the real work of getting him into a powerful aero position but Dave was afraid of doing much aero work because in the past it had always thrown his back out and nothing interferes more with training than an injury so we have taken baby steps. Dave has trusted me in this quest and I didn’t want to screw things up by pushing it too fast and messing up his back. We had a lot of time so there is no rush as his next race isn’t until January. I think Dave is just now coming to realize that he can ride aero and not mess his back up with shorter cranks.
The best teacher is experience and Dave is learning a lot even if he doesn’t understand the nuances of the rational of what I am doing. Most of you won’t either as most of you don’t have my academic or experience background. Some of you will ignore this because… well because it is coming from Dave and I. Others will be intrigued by the results and be willing to try some self experimenting to see what happens. Good for you if you do. Report back to the group on your experience.
Frank Day
Dave Campbell |
Facebook |
@DaveECampbell |
h2ofun@h2ofun.net Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box |
Bionic Runner |
PowerCranks |
Velotron |
Spruzzamist Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep