Like many on this board, my job requires me to assess credibility of people and what they write.
The quality of Hambini's answers, and in particular the personal attacks on other posters, have destroyed Hambini's credibility in my eyes, to the point where I can no longer attribute any weight to Hambini's opinion.
By contrast, Canadian (Chris/Flo) has responded consistently and despite considerable provocation - yes, looking at you GreenPlease - without obvious rancour. It is disappointing that he's been put in a position that he has had to defend himself against what appear to be baseless accusations. (Disclosure: I paid a substantial amount to Flo to acquire 60/90s and I don't hate them, but that doesn't make me a fan-boy. Particularly as I am still waiting for further news on those optimized gravel-wheels).
The most disappointing aspect of this entire thread is that the idea Hambini proposed intrigues me. What if the basic premise is correct? How do we learn more? And from which....credible....source?
The quality of Hambini's answers, and in particular the personal attacks on other posters, have destroyed Hambini's credibility in my eyes, to the point where I can no longer attribute any weight to Hambini's opinion.
By contrast, Canadian (Chris/Flo) has responded consistently and despite considerable provocation - yes, looking at you GreenPlease - without obvious rancour. It is disappointing that he's been put in a position that he has had to defend himself against what appear to be baseless accusations. (Disclosure: I paid a substantial amount to Flo to acquire 60/90s and I don't hate them, but that doesn't make me a fan-boy. Particularly as I am still waiting for further news on those optimized gravel-wheels).
The most disappointing aspect of this entire thread is that the idea Hambini proposed intrigues me. What if the basic premise is correct? How do we learn more? And from which....credible....source?