Toby wrote:
TiCass wrote:
Oh wow, Hambini delivers. Updated post with Flo's letter.
https://www.hambini.com/blog/post/bicycle-wheel-aerodynamics-which-one-is-fastest/
That certainly doesn't looks good for you guys. It's a disappointing response regardless of Hambini questionable behavior.
The interesting thing is that that letter:
1) does not appear to demand the Flo results be taken down as originally claimed
2) contains no specific legal threat
3) instead requests HR discipline for use of company equipment and rude public behavior
4) their item 2 does not hold any legal water whatsoever
5) the first two instances of "see attached" have the A capitalized; the third does not
6) their item 3 does not have a period
7) their item 1 lacks a space between "3" and "hours"
8) is redacted as to the legal firm in question ("legal firm")
On that last point, I'm not a lawyer, but what expectation is there that a nastygram is private and revealing the "legal firm" in question would open the recipient to further action? Legal action is not private, so if "they" decided to follow through this would all be public anyway. Without the name of a company to follow up on this is no level of proof and doesn't even sound like any lawyer letter I've seen. It does, in fact, sound much more like Hambini's own writing style. If that's the case...
And what about the other supposed letter from another company? Why wouldn't he have shown both?
http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/