kollac wrote:
Cobble wrote:
Carl Spackler wrote:
Not even close to as dominate and how easily he won. Remember in 2012 winning all the ToC and TdS stages almost at will, then taking a few TdF stages along with Green Jersey for good measure? He's been good but nowhere near that. One breakout year that was an anomaly? Too much pressure to perform? Hopefully one of those and not another reason...
I wouldn't call it one breakout year, it seemed more like a continuation of his growth at that time (and he was already a star very early on). Yet somehow it seemed to stop, still winning in smaller races but not getting close in classics or other big events.
I think he still gets close (3 second places in Qatar or Oman...don't remember which) but not as dominant as he used to be. Real bummer for me as a fan and compatriot.
And I'm not just blindly gobbling these performances up either. The sudden decrease in dominance makes me wonder what changed...training, expectations, herbal supplements? first line from this song
-----
Also, time to update your points from this past week. Spreadsheet here:
https://docs.google.com/...3RW2XLLB4/edit#gid=0 We are running on an honor system, so don't go inflating your stats
otherwise do people like the scoring system? Right now there are bonus points for picking the exact spots (2 for winner 1 for correct second or third place) of the podium but not for picking people on the podium, so if you pick Vanmarcke, Cancellara, GvA in that order for last year's Ronde, you get no bonus points despite picking the right composition of the podium. Would people like to change things so that picking winner gets 3 bonus points, and then 1 point if your pick ends up on the podium? So in this revised case, the aforementioned scenario gets you three points whereas someone picking Cancellara, Terpstra, and Stybar would have gotten 3 points while someone picking Terpstra, Cancellara, and Stybar would have gotten 1 point. Thoughts? I think this would reward more for picking the winner (as it ought to).