kileyay wrote:
Nicko wrote:
Release all data for
one bike now, de-identified.
Let any nerd make whatever analysis and presentation they feel is best. Submit. Discuss. Without dogs in the fight..
I'll do one better. Here is my Felt. Baseline run was first of the day and control was second to last in the day (late afternoon). I don't think this gives anything away -- it does show fairly consistent data.
This is still preliminary.
Wow.
That is not data. At best, it's a sales persons
picture of another knowledgeable persons data aquisition, filtering, pre-processing, averageing and presenting.
True "raw data" means IMO each and every
individual, physical sensor recording. For every 10ms (or whatever sampling frequency used). Millions of data points.
Layman "raw data" could mean the calculated axial drag force (in 'grams', sic!) from a combination of sensor readings, snipped in time and averaged down to a single number data point.
The spreadsheet mentioned earlier (with
hundreds of lines...) is an accumulation of such data points.
What you have in your 'picture' is another level of abstraction away from the raw data, with measured drag force scaled by measured dynamic pressure. To top it off, it's without beta-square correction and placed in 'yaw categories' instead of a proper, numerical x-axis... please...
Consider giving us "real raw data". Only then can the analysis protocol be scrutinzed in open air.
Nothing to hide, right?