I'm not outraged, just slightly disappointed... You'd think PubliusValerius of all would understand trial-by-internet...
Like your tone in this outburst.
Your first try at presenting data ends up as poor as your public beheading of the TriRig Omni by the flawed method of "sideways bending by hand". "LOOK, I CAN SEE IT FLEX! FFS!!".
With your history of vile criticism of most everything, I expected a lot more from you when you were going to "do it right". Not Coggan level reporting, or RChung insightful, but at least factually correct and very open about shortcomings.
Look, I honestly tried to initiate a discussion about the quality and granularity of typical wind tunnel data sets and procedures. The data set sample you have is what it is. Not your fault. You could have presented that weeks ago.
Sorry I called you a 'sales person', that was mean...
edit:spelling
Like your tone in this outburst.
Your first try at presenting data ends up as poor as your public beheading of the TriRig Omni by the flawed method of "sideways bending by hand". "LOOK, I CAN SEE IT FLEX! FFS!!".
With your history of vile criticism of most everything, I expected a lot more from you when you were going to "do it right". Not Coggan level reporting, or RChung insightful, but at least factually correct and very open about shortcomings.
Look, I honestly tried to initiate a discussion about the quality and granularity of typical wind tunnel data sets and procedures. The data set sample you have is what it is. Not your fault. You could have presented that weeks ago.
Sorry I called you a 'sales person', that was mean...
edit:spelling