SurfingLamb wrote:
Not saying I support the canning of coaches - but, in this instance, I paid the coach up front. A full year in advance. November to November and I had every intention of reupping. So your scenario doesn't apply here really.
That said, I think it's ok to let someone go if YOU are the one paying THEM. There's ways to go about it - but if you're not getting what you're paying for then by all means you shouldn't have to continue the service.
but if you fire one coach for a stupid reason - that makes you a douche and I wouldn't support it.
For what it's worth - in my eyes, at least - the relationship I had with them seemed great until yesterday. We weren't immensely close or anything, but I never got the impression that I was a bother or anything and felt that they were a pretty good coach.
Why is it ok to only let someone go if YOU are the one paying? I disagree with that 100%. Not saying this is the case, but why should a coach/attorney/accountant/etc stay in a relationship that is no longer beneficial to them? I have fired more than one client over the years. It wasnt worth it to me to continue dealing with them. One offered to pay me more, i said no. I didnt like his attitude and felt like he frequently brought me down. Why should i maintain that relationship just because i am being paid?
Again, i don't agree with the coach and you should be refunded your remaining balance. I think it was poor form and totally sucks for you. i just disagree that any coach or otherwise professional should be stay in relationship where they feel they are not getting what they want from the client. Unfortunately, this sounds like whatnthe coach decided (justified or not).