marcag wrote:
really happy today.
One thing I did for the team was the calculation of the pull times and power targets, with the objective of getting to the end as quickly as possible and as depleted as possible.
We take the data from physiological tests, their CDA data and measurements from test runs in 2nd, 3rd....8th position. We crunch it all, and figure out their postion, pull, who climbs....make a plan, try it once, twice and pray they don't crash.
It is just "science" but I am told the biggest impact is the riders believe in the plans. It clicked for the first time at the tour this year and I think this is the first time they ever win a TTT. I got a note from one of the riders after asking how close to plan he was and saying, I feel this is F1....In a good way (I think).
I am getting the scoop on their boss' run for Kona. He's gunning for his AG. We'll keep that in another thread but apparently he is on the Dev 1,000,000m swim program. His I swim is down by over 10min apparently.
Wow, this is ST analytic full circle for the TTT win. This is super cool that you brought some of this to the table. I always wondered how to optimally position riders for a TTT based on their strengths and aero profiles and keeping teams together to minimize the time of the last guy across the line. What was the cause of the Jumbo crash?
As for their boss, you can tell him that we still think that Lance would kick his ass in Kona LOL. As for the 1000km per year program, well, I'm doing 1200km per year, but I am not riding 20,000km and running 3000km like he probably is.