Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Slowman = Censorship
 
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
o'rly?

--------------------------------------------------------

It seemed like a good idea at the time. . .
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Dude, Slowman rocks. He and the Rapper and little Herb keep this place mellower than most forums. Hell, I would bet you a fiver I won't be around in a few months time and I am only a moderate douchebag. His house, his rules.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Are people posting under their real name on those sites, or do they use a "screen" name?

------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
You don't like it... then there's the door. Bye Bye

Like it or not... its is Slowman's house so to speak. You may not like it, but he likes a sense of peace and decorum, which is why this forum does not devolve into Road Warrior like nature.

Even if it is inconsistent... It is his rules... his house. We are guests. Don't forget to wipe your feet before entering and for God's sake, flush and light a candle if you have a real stink to let go.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Holy shit get over it or leave, that's how this place has always been run and it's why it's such a great place.

______________________________________________
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
You are a guest. He gets to set the rules.

From a practical standpoint, he absolutely has an interest in keeping this place reasonable sane. He doesn't do this out of the goodness of his heart. This is a business. He sells ad space. No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Maybe he's trying to save ST'ers from themselves.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Dude nice knowing ya ;0(

__________________________________________________
Official Polar Ambassador
http://www.google.com/...P7RiWyEVwpunlsc2JtQQ
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Grande Pelota] [ In reply to ]
 
Slowman is way more chilled about posts than other forums I've visited. I have no issue with his censoring, I only like to know what/why it was censored. In the Chicago Tri forum, I actually brought up the OP's issue about posting annoymous and he seemed to only want to give his info in a PM to me. In an accusation like that, you cant hide behind your screen name, so I had no issue with what he did.

------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Bmanners] [ In reply to ]
 


If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JSA] [ In reply to ]
 
He sells ad space. No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

Have you been to letsrun?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
87 posts, wonder how many more you will be able to make.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [walnutcreek tri] [ In reply to ]
 
walnutcreek tri wrote:
He sells ad space. No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

Have you been to letsrun?

Touche.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
Stockhouse is full of people doing illegal things. It is a dirty dirty forum but really useful if you are into trading stocks, particularly day trading. Even biggest scum bags provide valuable information. That is my point. All info provided is useful in some way to someone. If it is illegal it can be dealt with by the proper authorities.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
This is going to end well, I can already tell.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JSA] [ In reply to ]
 
No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

_____________

Honest question because I brought this up to Dan a few weeks ago. Do you feel ST is going downhill? I've thought I have noticed the amount of respect seems to be lacking over the past 6 months or so. Dan, disagreed and thought the quality was the highest it has ever been.


------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JSA] [ In reply to ]
 
You wanna bet. And the posts being deleted are hardly trashy or douchbaggy. Please, this forum is full of tight asses and couldnt even get out of control if it wanted to.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
As someone else suggested on another thread with an identical topic, there should be an island of misfit threads hanging out behind a paywall where people who are interested can support the site financially in exchange for looking at some potentially iffy material. Kind of like porn for people who like triathlon scandals...

__________________________

I tweet!

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
That explaination made me laugh. It's full of illegal things and it's a "dirty" forum, but it still provides some valuable info.

------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
I don't. I think it is cyclical. People get bitchy during certain times of the year. I seem to remember just a few years ago when it was REALLY bad. There were quite a few characters who are long gone.

I think it has been pretty good, overall, which the occasional losing of the mind every now and then.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
 
h2ofun wrote:
87 posts, wonder how many more you will be able to make.

.

Wouldnt that prove my point.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
I bet if YOU put a piece of coal inbetween the cheeks of some of these tight asses YOU would have a diamond in no time. :0)

__________________________________________________
Official Polar Ambassador
http://www.google.com/...P7RiWyEVwpunlsc2JtQQ
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
You wanna bet. And the posts being deleted are hardly trashy or douchbaggy. Please, this forum is full of tight asses and couldnt even get out of control if it wanted to.

I have to disagree. I cannot recall a single thread of any redeeming value that was removed for the sake of censorship. If anything, I have been surprised how far some threads have been allowed to progress.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
"If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them."

Seems a bit extreme for a blog and an opportunity to express your opinion or share an idea.

Legal system really????
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
Look at the posts where people are legitimately asking questions about fit, products, aero, etc., and I think you get a very informed answer. The problem is that for the most part people get stuck on the posts about Lance, Finman, etc. and it turns into an internet flame war.

If you ask the right questions, then the answers are here. If you want to argue about Lance, it is just like any other internet forum.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
 
refer to the link I provided. Like I said, companies are going after defamatory posters fairly regularly.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Reminds me of this:

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...0moderators;#3290203

--------------------------------------------------------

It seemed like a good idea at the time. . .
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
h2ofun wrote:
87 posts, wonder how many more you will be able to make.

.


Wouldnt that prove my point.

The point is unless you own this site, you have no legal right to do anything about what the owners want to do. Pretty much everything in live is the owner does not want to serve you, they do not have to.
So, what is your point again?

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
You wanna bet. And the posts being deleted are hardly trashy or douchbaggy. Please, this forum is full of tight asses and couldnt even get out of control if it wanted to.


Why do we want to be at the point that legal systems have to be the make or break for the forum? Shouldnt decency (spelling) and common sense be what dictates a forum. Why are you wanting to push the buttons so to speak. It's as if you want to be free simply to see how far that freedom is. Which I guess is part of the issues I see with most internet forums. Respect at times seems to be lost.

------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Well there it is Dan. Someone who posts on Stockhouse says that you have no legal exposure over your content. What is finman's real name again?
Last edited by: ajthomas: Aug 27, 12 14:41
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
what ever happened to the other blog? Will I be banned for mentioning it? Yeah totally agree but still, though on my third screen name keep coming back, unfortunately this is the best tri forum though rules are screwy and arbitrary, like, dont post about womens health issues or try to have political discussions in the womens forum. Swear wont look again but keep coming back much as there is to not like.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
 
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Adios
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [type-B] [ In reply to ]
 
That is a perfect example of a post that should have been left alone. The more recent example of Slowman censorship was when a discussion developed about Callenge Penticton and Slowman set parameters about how and what people could discuss and they just agreed with him like he was Father and they were two year old children. It was sad. And the entire motivation was to protect his own story on the topic, which was very disappointing.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
 
I don't mind Slowman deleting actual posts if they're innapropriate, but I'm not a fan of deleting/locking of threads. Being a Chicago guy, I was curious to see how this whole thing played out. Now, we'll probably never know.

But I guess Slowtwitch does bank some good money, so has to keep it clean: http://www.worthofweb.com/...value/slowtwitch.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C

to which I say If you really have a problem with how the forum is run you are welcome to GTFO....Get The F*** Out. Its Dan's sand box and I'm sure he would be happy to return your forum fee and cancel your account.

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Another complaint by another anonymous poster. If you don't have the decency to at least post your name, then maybe you should form your own tri forum where anonymous witch hunts are allowed/encouraged. Good luck with that...

Mike
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Bottom line, slowtwitch is privately owned. Dan's site, Dan's rules. If you don't like it, you are certainly free to not frequent the boards.

Oh, and if you are going to get anywhere in your argument, I suggest you:

a) post your real name.
b) learn to spell and/or use the correct homonym.
c) get the balls to fucking swear rather than use some cutesy acronym like you're 12.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Dan is kind of like Will Munny. He is cool and all until you kill his friend and put him in a box on Main Street. Then, he goes ape shit and starts killing people all over the place.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [type-B] [ In reply to ]
 
type-B wrote:
o'rly?




 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Jamaican] [ In reply to ]
 
lol. . .on my old car forum that would have been the second post.

--------------------------------------------------------

It seemed like a good idea at the time. . .
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Maui5150] [ In reply to ]
 
Maui5150 wrote:
You don't like it... then there's the door. Bye Bye

+1


Rodney
TrainingPeaks | Altra Running | RAD Roller
http://www.goinglong.ca
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do.

I am unsure of the law in the USA but in Australia the Forum owner is the person that is legally responsible for posts on their forum.

I personally think Dan can be a dickhead some of the time but it's his forum and he can do what he wants. So more power to him. As others have said if you don't like it, start your own.

Rhymenocerus wrote:
I think everyone should consult ST before they do anything.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
 
peterot wrote:
Stockhouse is full of people doing illegal things. It is a dirty dirty forum but really useful if you are into trading stocks, particularly day trading. Even biggest scum bags provide valuable information. That is my point. All info provided is useful in some way to someone. If it is illegal it can be dealt with by the proper authorities.

I disagree with your analogy, and I hope my explanation might provide some insight about why we choose to moderate the way we do.

Generally, if you want to make use of the information on a forum like Stockhouse, it's your own money that you're risking. A forum like Stockhouse is sort of the ultimate expression of "publicly available information being taken into consideration in the price of a security." Personally, I think it's also part of the reason why volatility indices have gotten so f'ed up in recent years, and why valuation of a lot of things - especially commodities, which really ought to have a more "rational" value - is so insane. But that's more Lavender Room territory.

But, generally, there's a pretty objective to evaluate past predictive performance. And, further, the risk is shouldered by you as the investor that chooses to make use - or not - of the information you find on stockhouse. YOUR money is on the line.

In the case of trial by internet here, it's rarely - if ever - your money (or even your reputation) that's on the line. It's that of a race, or a race director, or an athlete, or bike company, etc. There's no real skin in the game. Your race experience is not substantially affected by whether another participant cheated. So even if the information is accurate, it's still not necessarily "useful" to most people other than in a strictly voyeuristic way. Yes, you want to know if someone cheated. But you don't really derive any actual value from knowing it.

Moderating a forum like Stockhouse is necessarily impossible, because in order for it to function in a reasonably fair way, you basically have to allow everything. It's not fair to delete a post that says, "I'm short on XYZ you ignorant motherfucker," while leaving a post that says, "I'm long on XYZ. Have a nice day." But that same logic doesn't apply here. Decorum does matter here. Truth does matter here. We're not going to allow trial by internet because there's not necessarily a corresponding "free market" to actually sort things out in "the real world."

Stockhouse doesn't censor stuff because you are most likely to screw yourself based on bad information there. We do censor stuff because you are most likely to screw someone else based on bad information here. That's why, for example, this post is not being censored (yet; if it is, it will ONLY be because it becomes a re-hash of the Chicago threads, as often happens). Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [PJC] [ In reply to ]
 
PJC wrote:
peterot wrote:

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do.


I am unsure of the law in the USA but in Australia the Forum owner is the person that is legally responsible for posts on their forum.

I personally think Dan can be a dickhead some of the time but it's his forum and he can do what he wants. So more power to him. As others have said if you don't like it, start your own.

Read the petswarehouse.com lawsuit sometime for what can happen to people that disparage on the intertubes.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
i don't know if you expected to be banned or not for this thread, but, no, you're not banned, because you said nothing that warrants a ban. furthermore, there's nothing about this thread that requires any censorship.

but when i and my moderators, in our sole judgment, think a thread or a post or a user is out of line or inappropriate, we'll do what we feel is best. your protestations are not going to change that. period.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
His site, his rules.

___________________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/...eoesophageal_fistula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebral_palsy
2020 National Masters Champion - M40-44 - 400m IM
Canadian Record Holder 35-39M & 40-44M - 200 m Butterfly (LCM)
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Rappstar wrote:
Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945


FTW!


<If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough>
Get Fitter!
Proud member of the Smartasscrew, MONSTER CLUB
Get your FIX today?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Goosedog] [ In reply to ]
 
word ;-)

you guys behave yourselves or i'm going to get all will munny on you. and your families. and all your friends.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
BDoughtie wrote:
No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

_____________

Honest question because I brought this up to Dan a few weeks ago. Do you feel ST is going downhill? I've thought I have noticed the amount of respect seems to be lacking over the past 6 months or so. Dan, disagreed and thought the quality was the highest it has ever been.

I am a long time lurker...and only posting in recent years. It is MUCH nicer around here. I even post now! And since I post, I come back, I look at ads more, and even click on them. THIS is a good thing since I (and others like me) tend to spend money.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
 
Little Peterot: "But, I don't deserve this!!"

Slowman: "Deservin's got nuthin' to do with it... "

BLAM!!!!


float , hammer , and jog

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
"Slowman = Censorship"

Is that an assignment or comparison operator? I'm confused. In either case I suspect you have a type mismatch.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
It's his forum, his rules. You don't have a right to say whatever you want here. He can censor whatever he wants.

I find this forum pretty "laid back". You can talk about pretty much anything here.


 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
If you're not enjoying yourself on someone's private property the solution is simple.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
we like to be invited to Slowman Christmas party, so we behave all year, you on the other end wont be invited this year. ;(
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C

I really hate people like you. I mean, seriously, I hate you. This is a private website and a private business. The owner is allowed to do however they wish. You can leave if you don't like it.

Now you know why I hate people like you? I'll tell you. Our news in this country is completely censored crap, and where is your outrage about that? You're a coward picking on a private business. Sack up and face real problems and real censorship.

--------------------------------------------------------

You will remain the same person, before, during and after the race. So the result, no matter how important, will not define you. The journey is what matters. ~ Chrissie W.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Pooks] [ In reply to ]
 
Pooks wrote:
"Slowman = Censorship"

Is that an assignment or comparison operator? I'm confused. In either case I suspect you have a type mismatch.

I thought it was more of a JavaScript cast. Like "Set Slowman = Censorship [for the purpose of this function - aka, thread]." They're both nouns, so I'm not sure it'd really throw an error.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C

Gotta tell you, you sure know how to brighten up Dan's day! Not only he will find your post absolutely DELICIOUS, but he'll derive great pleasure in reading the whole thread!

-

The Triathlon Squad

Like us on Facebook!!!
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
 
Slowman wrote:
i don't know if you expected to be banned or not for this thread, but, no, you're not banned, because you said nothing that warrants a ban. furthermore, there's nothing about this thread that requires any censorship.

but when i and my moderators, in our sole judgment, think a thread or a post or a user is out of line or inappropriate, we'll do what we feel is best. your protestations are not going to change that. period.

Slowman you should make me a mod.



-All You Haters Suck My Balls-
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Trash Talk] [ In reply to ]
 
That made me laugh
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
It's simple:

Dan owns the brand/website

He keeps a clean house where him and Rapp (among others) do a great job with interviews/articles/cool triathlon insights. Even Rapp (a top tier Pro/not debatable) does a "Asked anything about ABC Ironman). Bryan gives us Rapps nutrition

Some other Pros just chime in sometimes like Dirk Bockel and others.

To be honest don't care how many threads Dan deletes/locks down just keep this is website alive and thriving as you are!!

(Dan if you are in fact reading this please don't delete any of the hottie threads! We need those! ;0)
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Rappstar wrote:
...

Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945

I'm positive that I wasn't the only one that knew what that was linked to without clicking on it - greatness!

Twomarks
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
 
and your families. and all your friends.

and don't be cutt'n up no more whores!

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Wouldn't we all love to be in a position to be Judge, Jury, and Executioner. You make it seem like a bad thing.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
It's a macro definition. Wherever you see the string "Slowman" you substitute the text "Censorship".

----------------------------------
"Go yell at an M&M"
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [twomarks] [ In reply to ]
 
twomarks wrote:
Rappstar wrote:
...

Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945


I'm positive that I wasn't the only one that knew what that was linked to without clicking on it - greatness!

Twomarks

+1. It's easily chainpin's greatest contribution to this forum.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [aftereffector] [ In reply to ]
 
aftereffector wrote:
twomarks wrote:
Rappstar wrote:
...

Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945


I'm positive that I wasn't the only one that knew what that was linked to without clicking on it - greatness!

Twomarks

+1. It's easily chainpin's greatest contribution to this forum.
Yep... No need to click. To the OP......
WAAAAAAAA...............

__________________________________________________
Official Polar Ambassador
http://www.google.com/...P7RiWyEVwpunlsc2JtQQ
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Murphy'sLaw] [ In reply to ]
 
Murphy'sLaw wrote:
Little Peterot: "But, I don't deserve this!!"

Slowman: "Deservin's got nuthin' to do with it... "

BLAM!!!!

PSA: Unforgiven is on right now on cmt.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Trash Talk] [ In reply to ]
 
 
:)
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C


What the fuck is Faq??

_________________________________________________
When all is said and done. More is usually said than done
Ba Ba Booey

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [AnthonyS] [ In reply to ]
 
AnthonyS wrote:
I really hate people like you. I mean, seriously, I hate you. This is a private website and a private business. The owner is allowed to do however they wish. You can leave if you don't like it.

Now you know why I hate people like you? I'll tell you. Our news in this country is completely censored crap, and where is your outrage about that? You're a coward picking on a private business. Sack up and face real problems and real censorship.

Aw, Snap. QFT.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [NC Fartstorm] [ In reply to ]
 
Frequenty Asked Questions? Who gives a fuck?


float , hammer , and jog

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DrPete] [ In reply to ]
 
DrPete wrote:
AnthonyS wrote:
I really hate people like you. I mean, seriously, I hate you. This is a private website and a private business. The owner is allowed to do however they wish. You can leave if you don't like it.

Now you know why I hate people like you? I'll tell you. Our news in this country is completely censored crap, and where is your outrage about that? You're a coward picking on a private business. Sack up and face real problems and real censorship.

Aw, Snap. QFT.

Just out of curiosity, who is leading this censorship?

Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!

"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Power13] [ In reply to ]
 
Can someone page me when this turns into a hottie thread?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Power13] [ In reply to ]
 
The filtered quasi-reality that is "war reporting" is a decent place to start. Not to mention other places in the world where true censorship is a problem. Much like AnthonyS, it just pisses me off when people whine about "censorship" on private forums that they joined voluntarily. There's too much real censorship in the world to start whining about not getting a hug on an online forum.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DrPete] [ In reply to ]
 
But the claim was that the news "in this country" was completely censored crap. Not the rest of the world, here. So who is doing the censoring?

(and I am more than willing to agree that the news in this country is complete crap....but that is a different topic.)

Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!

"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Goosedog] [ In reply to ]
 
loved that movie. That makes Dan a real bad ass!


I have deceptive speed.........I'm slower than I look!
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Skoalz] [ In reply to ]
 
The OP could do like Jay & Silent Bob when they got royalty money and hunt down/ retrieve every blogger/poster who disrespected or censored them on line and beat the hell out of them (including a priest).

You can use run-on sentences, but you can't hide indefinitely on the interweb.

My thread got pulled out and it was fair. I admit, I cried a bit about it then it passed.
+ a witch-hunt is fun up until the culprit is ousted. After that it can get ugly.
U-G-L-Y you ain't got no alibi you're ugly... (SNL)



Only fools never change their minds and I'll never change my mind about that.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Rappstar wrote:
peterot wrote:
Stockhouse is full of people doing illegal things. It is a dirty dirty forum but really useful if you are into trading stocks, particularly day trading. Even biggest scum bags provide valuable information. That is my point. All info provided is useful in some way to someone. If it is illegal it can be dealt with by the proper authorities.


I disagree with your analogy, and I hope my explanation might provide some insight about why we choose to moderate the way we do.

Generally, if you want to make use of the information on a forum like Stockhouse, it's your own money that you're risking. A forum like Stockhouse is sort of the ultimate expression of "publicly available information being taken into consideration in the price of a security." Personally, I think it's also part of the reason why volatility indices have gotten so f'ed up in recent years, and why valuation of a lot of things - especially commodities, which really ought to have a more "rational" value - is so insane. But that's more Lavender Room territory.

But, generally, there's a pretty objective to evaluate past predictive performance. And, further, the risk is shouldered by you as the investor that chooses to make use - or not - of the information you find on stockhouse. YOUR money is on the line.

In the case of trial by internet here, it's rarely - if ever - your money (or even your reputation) that's on the line. It's that of a race, or a race director, or an athlete, or bike company, etc. There's no real skin in the game. Your race experience is not substantially affected by whether another participant cheated. So even if the information is accurate, it's still not necessarily "useful" to most people other than in a strictly voyeuristic way. Yes, you want to know if someone cheated. But you don't really derive any actual value from knowing it.

Moderating a forum like Stockhouse is necessarily impossible, because in order for it to function in a reasonably fair way, you basically have to allow everything. It's not fair to delete a post that says, "I'm short on XYZ you ignorant motherfucker," while leaving a post that says, "I'm long on XYZ. Have a nice day." But that same logic doesn't apply here. Decorum does matter here. Truth does matter here. We're not going to allow trial by internet because there's not necessarily a corresponding "free market" to actually sort things out in "the real world."

Stockhouse doesn't censor stuff because you are most likely to screw yourself based on bad information there. We do censor stuff because you are most likely to screw someone else based on bad information here. That's why, for example, this post is not being censored (yet; if it is, it will ONLY be because it becomes a re-hash of the Chicago threads, as often happens). Though I think you might have been better off posting it here - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...post=1566945#1566945

Do you actually beleive the BS you spew sometimes "Decorum does matter here" - funny "Truth does matter here" - if this was the case you wouldnt censor so much. censorship often results in untruth. there are instances where censorship is required but sure as hell not on a triathlon forum. THe bottomline for you guys is the financial bottomline. You dont care about truth and decorum (what bs) you care about traffic and keeping industry folks happy so they dont cut ads and drive traffic elsewhere. This site is a communication tool second and money maker first which is unfortunate as the forum is the best part of the entire site, which has been pointed out to you on numerous occasions recently. People avoid homepage all together to come directly to a forum that is being censored to the point where only warm and fuzzy stuff is given approval. Your rampant censorship is opening the door for another forum to takeover. I am not debating whether Slowman has the right to censor or if it is his property. He does not own the discussion, opinions, and ideas being written. I would just like to see less (no) censorship on the forum. The shit being censored is such a joke, particularly the most recent examples i noted. You comparison of the differences between Stockhouse and Slowtwitch shows your inexpereince with stockhouse.

A forum like Stockhouse is sort of the ultimate expression of "publicly available information being taken into consideration in the price of a security." - the info on stockhouse is so much more, the info being share goes beyond the public realm, insider info is posted regularly, ceos comment, IR people are present, the emotion of the forum on big news, rumour or extreme market conditions, and the pump and dump scemes going on. The info that can be teased out of stockhouse is good stuff. Discussion are allowed to go in all directions. I would suggest you spend some time there as it will provide you with an example of a forum that has energy, knowledgable people, real uncensored info, usefulness. Again, there have been numerous posts regarding the lack of energy or interesting post on slowtwitch, censorship has likely contributed to this. You guys are killing something good. in other forums outside of slowtwitch to know that this forum is dying a slow death and that it is lacking big time, particularly in the regard to the censorship, parameters put on discussion, etc. Just my opinion.

To everyone else, it is probably time to get off your knees and let Slowman and other mods. get back to censoring this forum.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Good grief. Go away or contribute or lurk. Your choice.

Dan & ST has no moral or legal obligation to put up with shit like yours.

AP

------------------------
"How bad could it be?" - SimpleS
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Your rampant censorship is opening the door for another forum to takeover.

Like which one? BT? Ahh, I crack myself up sometimes.

For the rest of your rant: cool story, bro.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [walnutcreek tri] [ In reply to ]
 
walnutcreek tri wrote:
He sells ad space. No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

Have you been to letsrun?

wait. Isn't that every internet forum?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [aftereffector] [ In reply to ]
 
.




Here is a bit of data from alexa.com - Slowtwitch sure aint growing. I am sure the censorship and forum manipulation will help with that. Industry will be happy but there wont be anyone on the site so they will pull their ads. anyway.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Are you a lonely, bored 12 year old boy who's parents put a porn filter on your computer? Looking for some attention?

If not I can't figure out for the life of me why you are saying this stupid shit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jen

"In order to keep a true perspective on one's importance, everyone should have a dog that worships him and a cat that will ignore him." - Dereke Bruce
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JenSw] [ In reply to ]
 
JenSw wrote:
Are you a lonely, bored 12 year old boy who's parents put a porn filter on your computer? Looking for some attention?

If not I can't figure out for the life of me why you are saying this stupid shit.

I cant believe so many support censorship. Pointing out needless censorship is stupid shit?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Pointing out needless censorship over needless discussions is indeed stupid shit.

Talk about first world problems...

-

The Triathlon Squad

Like us on Facebook!!!
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
That statement implies there is an assumption of freedom of speech with no consequence. That doesn't exist, anywhere.

People who post here generally know this isn't a public place at all. We don't expect to be able to say whatever we want. I can't figure out where you got the idea that you could.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jen

"In order to keep a true perspective on one's importance, everyone should have a dog that worships him and a cat that will ignore him." - Dereke Bruce
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
The more recent example of Slowman censorship was when a discussion developed about Callenge Penticton and Slowman set parameters about how and what people could discuss and they just agreed with him like he was Father and they were two year old children.

Are you talking about this thread: http://forum.slowtwitch.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;

What happened there was that Dan deleted, at Challenge's request, a copy-paste of a Challenge press release that they had mistakenly posted online prior to the official announcement.

The reason no one complained was that they understood that the deletion was made as a courtesy.

You can call it censorship if you like, but if Slowtwitch operated the way you want it to - with no courtesy, and no moderation to get rid of the snake oil sellers, or libelers, or offensive idiots - the discussion would quickly devolve, and I personally wouldn't spend any time here.

Graham Barron Design: Custom west coast house design http://www.grahambarron.com/
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:


Do you actually beleive the BS you spew sometimes "Decorum does matter here" - funny "Truth does matter here" - if this was the case you wouldnt censor so much. censorship often results in untruth. there are instances where censorship is required but sure as hell not on a triathlon forum. THe bottomline for you guys is the financial bottomline. You dont care about truth and decorum (what bs) you care about traffic and keeping industry folks happy so they dont cut ads and drive traffic elsewhere. This site is a communication tool second and money maker first which is unfortunate as the forum is the best part of the entire site, which has been pointed out to you on numerous occasions recently. People avoid homepage all together to come directly to a forum that is being censored to the point where only warm and fuzzy stuff is given approval. Your rampant censorship is opening the door for another forum to takeover. I am not debating whether Slowman has the right to censor or if it is his property. He does not own the discussion, opinions, and ideas being written. I would just like to see less (no) censorship on the forum. The shit being censored is such a joke, particularly the most recent examples i noted. You comparison of the differences between Stockhouse and Slowtwitch shows your inexpereince with stockhouse.

A forum like Stockhouse is sort of the ultimate expression of "publicly available information being taken into consideration in the price of a security." - the info on stockhouse is so much more, the info being share goes beyond the public realm, insider info is posted regularly, ceos comment, IR people are present, the emotion of the forum on big news, rumour or extreme market conditions, and the pump and dump scemes going on. The info that can be teased out of stockhouse is good stuff. Discussion are allowed to go in all directions. I would suggest you spend some time there as it will provide you with an example of a forum that has energy, knowledgable people, real uncensored info, usefulness. Again, there have been numerous posts regarding the lack of energy or interesting post on slowtwitch, censorship has likely contributed to this. You guys are killing something good. in other forums outside of slowtwitch to know that this forum is dying a slow death and that it is lacking big time, particularly in the regard to the censorship, parameters put on discussion, etc. Just my opinion.

To everyone else, it is probably time to get off your knees and let Slowman and other mods. get back to censoring this forum.


Actually, the slowtwitch homepage is the best information on Triathlon available on the internet (or anywhere else for that matter). Unfortunately, for you, it doesn't have any info about stock markets. I also find it highly humorous that someone who spends his life on stock market forums, accuses Dan of thinking money first. Why are you here again?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
To everyone else, it is probably time to get off your knees and let Slowman and other mods. get back to censoring this forum.


 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JenSw] [ In reply to ]
 
JenSw wrote:
Are you a lonely, bored 12 year old boy who's parents put a porn filter on your computer? Looking for some attention?

If not I can't figure out for the life of me why you are saying this stupid shit.

Nailed it.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
This isn't 4chan and thank god for that.

Why don't you go back to /b/ with all of your fellow basement dwelling neckbeards.

Cheers,


Michael J. Pelechaty
Brewer, Black Box Brewing Co.

"Yeah, I was depressed for a little while, but then I remembered how awesome I am."
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
...censored to the point where only warm and fuzzy stuff is given approval...

You obviously don't actually read this forum...

-David
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JSA] [ In reply to ]
 
This is his "business" - pays the bills for Slowman, Herbert and Jordan. This is a "propaganda" machine, just like every news channel.

Do you think Rapp would be as high profile triathlete without ST? He's got the marketing savy, so probably yes, but he seems to be doing more for the Rapp brand being on slowtwitch then his actual racing.



ErgDB Erg & PowerAgent workout generator | My blog - special thanks to Kiwami
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I just took a peak at the Chicago cheating thread and the first message I see is another message by judge, jury and executioner (aka Slowman). Holy Faq I am not sure why you feel the need. If people are out of line let the legal system deal with them. The forum I view most often is Stockhouse and it is actually quit common that companies to take legal action against posters. You dont see power hunger moderators taking over and getting involved. The only threads/posts deleted are spam and all else goes. It is very refreshing compared to Slowtwitch in that regard. Given the forum is about the stock market and people losing and making money you can just imagine how negative things can get on there.

Please, if a post is out of line or illegal than let the legal system deal with it and stay the faq out of it. This goes to your staffers as well. You have no legal obligation to censor the forum like you do. If you feel you have some sort of moral or ethical obligation, get over it. The most evil things put on this forum would be consider light-hearted on Stockhouse and many other forums.

It seems almost every thread i read now there is something censored.

STOP THE CENSORSHIP

http://www.stockwatch.com/...bol=WND&region=C

What else do you worry about during the day?


 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [stratman05] [ In reply to ]
 
stratman05 wrote:
This is his "business" - pays the bills for Slowman, Herbert and Jordan. This is a "propaganda" machine, just like every news channel.

Do you think Rapp would be as high profile triathlete without ST? He's got the marketing savy, so probably yes, but he seems to be doing more for the Rapp brand being on slowtwitch then his actual racing.

You don't think that Jordan's race results don't speak for themselves?!? What planet do you live on?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [stratman05] [ In reply to ]
 
stratman05 wrote:
This is his "business" - pays the bills for Slowman, Herbert and Jordan. This is a "propaganda" machine, just like every news channel.

Do you think Rapp would be as high profile triathlete without ST? He's got the marketing savy, so probably yes, but he seems to be doing more for the Rapp brand being on slowtwitch then his actual racing.

You are kidding, right? First, ST has a huge following, but, no one outside of tri knows about it. In the tri scene, the percentage of athletes who spend time here is quite small. We like to think every triathlete visits here, but most I talk to don't even know about the site.

Second, are you nuts? The guy wins everything he enters! He does not need ST to gain a following.

Finally, ST gives us shlubs access to top level pros like Jordan. He doesn't need us, but, we are damn lucky to have him.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JenSw] [ In reply to ]
 
JenSw wrote:
Are you a lonely, bored 12 year old boy who's parents put a porn filter on your computer? Looking for some attention?

If not I can't figure out for the life of me why you are saying this stupid shit.


I just blew coffee out of my nose... If I weren't already married, I think I'd ask for your hand just based on this comment! Nice...


Oh, and to "Peterot": I was actually following this thread and listening to your BS right up until you insulted (or tried to) a professional athlete who takes time frequently to come on here and post advice and guidance to us wanna-be's. Even taking the time to answer personal questions with personal emails. As a retired pro-athlete (different sport) I admit I rarely ever did that. I've only been a member of ST Nation for about a year and a half, but based on your comments I think it's my right to tell you to go to hell, you don't belong here.



-Eric
---
"The Fit Shall Inherit the Earth" -Endurance Conspiracy
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
" refer to the link I provided. Like I said, companies are going after defamatory posters fairly regularly. "
------------------
That's because in the stock business it directly effects the economics and there is an economic remedy......there is not an economic remedy for being an out of line idiot, so we have my main man Herbert, the most epic Slowman, and boy (formerly) genius Rapp to keep things in line. Personally, if I were them I'd narrow the fences even a bit more (although it would have gotten me a time or two).

David
* Ironman for Life! (Blog) * IM Everyday Hero Video * Daggett Shuler Law *
Disclaimer: I have personal and professional relationships with many athletes, vendors, and organizations in the triathlon world.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Just saw this thread. I am amazed by the lack of comprehension.

First. What Dan does is NOT censorship. He is not the government and there is no "right" to free speech on a private site. When you decide to post here you also agree to abide by the owner's rules.

Second, as a some-time editor here, and having been a moderator on another site, it is a difficult job to moderate posts. Everyone will not be happy no matter how it is done. Get over it.

Third, if you are happier on other sites stay there.

Fourth, the random comments about Dan and Jordan's motivations regarding ST are Bizzaro at best.

Finally for a point of comparison I will post a link to a closed thread from another site so you can see how extreme things can be.

(once again be warned: This thread can suck up A LOT of your time!) http://www.pirate4x4.com/...?t=399203&page=5

http://www.EpixGear.com
Last edited by: DougRob: Aug 28, 12 6:53
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
[..] be warned: This thread can suck up A LOT of your time!) http://www.pirate4x4.com/...?t=399203&page=5

Dude, I had to close it right away. Must. Not. Re-open! ST is like a bed of roses compared to that.


 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
Just saw this thread. I am amazed by the lack of comprehension.
First. What Dan does is NOT censorship. He is not the government and there is no "right" to free speech on a private site. When you decide to post here you also agree to abide by the owner's rules.

First. While I agree with most of what you said, before you sling comprehension insults, you should go back and read the definition for censor: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable.

Says nothing about it needing to be a government, or even spoken aloud (self censorship). Suppress or delete anything objectionable, according to the standards of whoever is doing the censoring. What dan/jordan/herbert do, is censor. They consider not only the business model, but also the feelings and considerations of others. I can count 3 or 4 threads this year that were pulled merely as a courtesy to families/friends over tragedy, others that were pulled because they were just baseless accusations, etc. There are also threads that have been restored once the strictures of proof, naming yourself, etc. were updated.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [AndyPants] [ In reply to ]
 
AndyPants wrote:
Good grief. Go away or contribute or lurk. Your choice.

Dan & ST has no moral or legal obligation to put up with shit like yours.

AP

As usual, people like this post without their real name. Shows all I need to know about their true character

..

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Trash Talk] [ In reply to ]
 
Trash Talk wrote:
Slowman you should make me a mod.

A mod?


I always figured you were a rocker.

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
 
h2ofun wrote:
AndyPants wrote:
Good grief. Go away or contribute or lurk. Your choice.

Dan & ST has no moral or legal obligation to put up with shit like yours.

AP


As usual, people like this post without their real name. Shows all I need to know about their true character

..

As opposed to the OP, who doesn't even list a first name, or location in their profile while Andy has both?

Your holier than thou attitude (Followed by a chuckling "me, I'm just a guy" post whenever called on it) really does wear thin.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
 
h2ofun wrote:
AndyPants wrote:
Good grief. Go away or contribute or lurk. Your choice.

Dan & ST has no moral or legal obligation to put up with shit like yours.

AP


As usual, people like this post without their real name. Shows all I need to know about their true character

..

There are a number of legitimate reasons why people do not use their names on the Internet. A forum member's recent stalking of another through PM's is a great example. Who needs that kind of activity in their "real" lives, when jobs and personal relationships can be put at risk....

Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!

"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [JSA] [ In reply to ]
 
JSA wrote:
You are kidding, right? First, ST has a huge following, but, no one outside of tri knows about it.

That's not entirely true; I have friends in RunningAhead, and from "friends & family" forums that you probably haven't heard of, [like CoolRunning and KickRunners], and my FB friends, of course, who have all certainly heard of Slowtwitch. I'm posting links around pretty frequently, sharing whatever info or entertainment I think they'd find relevant

A lot of them are just lurkers, sure [they feel a little shy to post, because they're not all multisport athletes], but they do know about ST

Glad to help

~ Aloha ~
Randy

"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
 
BDoughtie wrote:
No one wants to pay for ad space on a forum full of trash and douche bags.

_____________

Honest question because I brought this up to Dan a few weeks ago. Do you feel ST is going downhill? I've thought I have noticed the amount of respect seems to be lacking over the past 6 months or so. Dan, disagreed and thought the quality was the highest it has ever been.

ST has a reputation for being filled with the elitist triathletes. I've seen threads where people ask simple questions, get shredded by others. When I was first directed to this site by a group of athletes, they all warned me about the reputation. I've never really had any issues and have read many constructive threads that have helped me. I've purchased numerous things from the classifieds, some bike ticket items: Reynolds wheels, Felt B12 bike. All great experience.

I tell a newbie that before asking ST, you may want to google your question or go visit BT for the information. If all else fails, then ask on ST. Also be very very thick skinned.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Here is a bit of data from alexa.com - Slowtwitch sure aint growing. I am sure the censorship and forum manipulation will help with that. Industry will be happy but there wont be anyone on the site so they will pull their ads. anyway.

Alexa - like most traffic algorithms - has its very serious limitations, especially since we don't participate by using any of the big internet tracking tools - like reselling doubleclick ads. We serve every ad in house. We actually took a reasonably big hit in the short term when we gave up on give ad space to a reseller, but we didn't really like that they wouldn't abide by our ad rules strictly - no screen takeovers, no expansion ads, no sound, etc - and even had some concern about the tracking of web usage that goes on with stuff like doubleclick. So we decided to go 100% in house with our ads. But that's (part of) why Alexa data isn't going to be particularly accurate for our site. We've actually struggled with that internally, because people use sites like Alexa to evaluate sites. It would actually look better for our business to give up some of our control and make our data more public, but we're not really comfortable with that, so we don't. The only cookies that come from this site are from this forum. And whatever google analytics uses (we do need some tools). And, if you make use of the twitter/facebook share buttons or facebook comments - voluntarily of course - that gets tracked by those entities (but not by us).

Slowtwitch actually is growing quite a bit. Obviously there are a bunch of different metrics - pageviews, pages per visit, unique visitors, time on site, etc. - you can use, but on average, we're up between 15-25% on all metrics vs. a year ago.

PS: your best bet if you want to share Alexa data is to do a screen grab and post it to Tinypic. You can push the "preview post" button to see that what you did in attempting to post the Alexa data didn't actually work. Just FYI.

What I really don't understand is what you are so angry about with all this. How we run our forum clearly irritates you. And I don't really understand why. I can understand it with regards to something like Stockhouse, for the reasons I mentioned. There's money on the line. Plus the issue of censoring information leading to some sort of positional bias. But the purpose of Stockhouse is, supposedly anyway, to give/share information that is used for financial gain. Even if the stated purpose of this forum was to share information that was intended to lead to triathlon "gain" - it's not; I don't even know if we really have a stated purpose for this forum - what is the real harm that comes to you as a result of that? I.e., if someone censors Stockhouse, you could maybe say that you lost money. But if we censor some post about triathlete potentially cheating at Chicago, what is the net negative of that to you? Are we somehow taking seconds off your potential PR by censoring anonymous accusations against some random age-grouper? I guess that's what's really so mysterious about your diatribe. Why does this piss you off so much? Slowtwitch isn't Stockhouse. It's not going to be. This to a significant degree (though not entirely) because - thankfully - triathlon isn't finance. But what I don't understand is in what way that actually materially damages your triathlon experience.

As a personal aside unrelated to how I/we moderate, I think you're an asshole for slamming me for trying to give a thoughtful reply to your post, especially after you came onto a thread and asked me very probative questions about my personal finances - because, as you justified it, I said, "ask me ANYTHING." (which conveniently ignores the fact that I said "...about the Ironman US Championships" right after). That was a question which I answered in a pretty open and - it seemed by your reply to my response - helpful way. Reading your posts on this thread, you sound like a spoiled child who can't get what he wants, which - based on your reply to Murphy's Law that stated that you had a BC pension - you are not. For a guy that's old enough to earn a pension, you seriously need to grow up.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [randymar] [ In reply to ]
 
Example(s) of above

Quote:
Quote from: onawhim on August 27, 2012, 01:10:47 PM
Did anyone else hear the USADA guy in the radio interview? They posted it over on ST. He sounded very reasonable to me but what do I know?

Quote:
Quote from: MoCo on August 22, 2012, 06:43:07 PM
I love Rappstar. I'm glad he won, he seems like a nice guy.



"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [randymar] [ In reply to ]
 
I've been an administer on a forum with over 15,000 members. It wasn't fun. Always accused of censorship. It's a balance between selling ad space and open dialog. Very tough thing to do.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Rappstar wrote:
peterot wrote:
Here is a bit of data from alexa.com - Slowtwitch sure aint growing. I am sure the censorship and forum manipulation will help with that. Industry will be happy but there wont be anyone on the site so they will pull their ads. anyway.


Alexa - like most traffic algorithms - has its very serious limitations, especially since we don't participate by using any of the big internet tracking tools - like reselling doubleclick ads. We serve every ad in house. We actually took a reasonably big hit in the short term when we gave up on give ad space to a reseller, but we didn't really like that they wouldn't abide by our ad rules strictly - no screen takeovers, no expansion ads, no sound, etc - and even had some concern about the tracking of web usage that goes on with stuff like doubleclick. So we decided to go 100% in house with our ads. But that's (part of) why Alexa data isn't going to be particularly accurate for our site. We've actually struggled with that internally, because people use sites like Alexa to evaluate sites. It would actually look better for our business to give up some of our control and make our data more public, but we're not really comfortable with that, so we don't. The only cookies that come from this site are from this forum. And whatever google analytics uses (we do need some tools). And, if you make use of the twitter/facebook share buttons or facebook comments - voluntarily of course - that gets tracked by those entities (but not by us).

Slowtwitch actually is growing quite a bit. Obviously there are a bunch of different metrics - pageviews, pages per visit, unique visitors, time on site, etc. - you can use, but on average, we're up between 15-25% on all metrics vs. a year ago.

PS: your best bet if you want to share Alexa data is to do a screen grab and post it to Tinypic. You can push the "preview post" button to see that what you did in attempting to post the Alexa data didn't actually work. Just FYI.

What I really don't understand is what you are so angry about with all this. How we run our forum clearly irritates you. And I don't really understand why. I can understand it with regards to something like Stockhouse, for the reasons I mentioned. There's money on the line. Plus the issue of censoring information leading to some sort of positional bias. But the purpose of Stockhouse is, supposedly anyway, to give/share information that is used for financial gain. Even if the stated purpose of this forum was to share information that was intended to lead to triathlon "gain" - it's not; I don't even know if we really have a stated purpose for this forum - what is the real harm that comes to you as a result of that? I.e., if someone censors Stockhouse, you could maybe say that you lost money. But if we censor some post about triathlete potentially cheating at Chicago, what is the net negative of that to you? Are we somehow taking seconds off your potential PR by censoring anonymous accusations against some random age-grouper? I guess that's what's really so mysterious about your diatribe. Why does this piss you off so much? Slowtwitch isn't Stockhouse. It's not going to be. This to a significant degree (though not entirely) because - thankfully - triathlon isn't finance. But what I don't understand is in what way that actually materially damages your triathlon experience.

As a personal aside unrelated to how I/we moderate, I think you're an asshole for slamming me for trying to give a thoughtful reply to your post, especially after you came onto a thread and asked me very probative questions about my personal finances - because, as you justified it, I said, "ask me ANYTHING." (which conveniently ignores the fact that I said "...about the Ironman US Championships" right after). That was a question which I answered in a pretty open and - it seemed by your reply to my response - helpful way. Reading your posts on this thread, you sound like a spoiled child who can't get what he wants, which - based on your reply to Murphy's Law that stated that you had a BC pension - you are not. For a guy that's old enough to earn a pension, you seriously need to grow up.

Not sure how I slammed you? My questions for you regarding finance were with the expectation that you may not answer (please read the post in full). In general, I dont agree with censorship. It ruins my experience here because I come here for information and your censorship limits by ability to get info. You control the info i get and you do not allow me to make decisions for myself regarding which info I think is useless and should be tossed and which is useful or entertaining. It isnt about PRs or equipment it is about information in general. I have nothing personal against you or any mods, you are a pro that I follow and hope does well but when you have your slowtwitch professional hat on I have a problem with how you run the forum. Censorship is a significant problem whether you are first world or third and it should be address whether you are on a forum or dealing with gov. I am only 35 so I probably do have so growing up to do.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [stratman05] [ In reply to ]
 
stratman05 wrote:
This is his "business" - pays the bills for Slowman, Herbert and Jordan. This is a "propaganda" machine, just like every news channel.

Do you think Rapp would be as high profile triathlete without ST? He's got the marketing savy, so probably yes, but he seems to be doing more for the Rapp brand being on slowtwitch then his actual racing.

Absolutely. There is no question that I certainly do way WAY more for my brand being on here than by racing. There are 26 (last I counted; it might be more now) Ironman races around the globe each year. There are 836 pro athletes on the KPR list alone. Being a "pro triathlete" is pretty meaningless. Even being a pro triathlete that wins races is pretty meaningless. There's ONE long course race where simply winning makes you famous - Kona. That's it. You win Kona, people buy what you use, though even that's debatable. It matters HOW you win. People didn't give a shit what shoes Normann Stadler wore when he won, because he won the races on the bike.

Triathlon is not a mass media sport, though even within a mass media sport like the NBA, it's only really the stars that sell simply by virtue of who they are. People bought Air Jordans shoes because of MJ. Nobody was out there in the shops asking for the latest shoes that Raef Lafrentz was wearing when he was playing. Just go into any sporting good store. You can't get every jersey. Even in the home town of a team, you still can't get every jersey. Nobody cares about some special teams grunt in the NFL. And that guy is better than 99.9999% of everyone who plays the game of football.

So, yes, you are absolutely right that I'm doing more for my brand by being here than by actually racing. And your point is? That I realize that I need to do more to earn a living than winning one of the five Ironmans that took place in the month of August?

This IS our business (both slowtwitch alone in my case as I work for Dan, but also in the larger sense of my business of being a pro triathlete) - no need to put it in quotation marks.

As for whether or not it's a propaganda machine, on the other hand, what is the particular cause or point of view we are trying to promote (or discourage)? That's a necessary component of propaganda. You can certainly accuse me of propaganda - my own best interest is quite obviously what I want to promote (duh). But what do you suppose is the point of view that Slowtwitch at large is focused on? Fox News = "conservative." MSNBC = "liberal." Slowtwitch = ? I'm interested to know what you think the answer to that last one is...

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:

You control the info i get and you do not allow me to make decisions for myself regarding which info I think is useless and should be tossed and which is useful or entertaining.

When you control the mail . . . you control . . . information.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg_4z2adv6Q
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
.




Here is a bit of data from alexa.com - Slowtwitch sure aint growing. I am sure the censorship and forum manipulation will help with that. Industry will be happy but there wont be anyone on the site so they will pull their ads. anyway.

You clearly don't understand SEO. I just spent the better part of an hour slicing and dicing Slowtwich and they are not only growing, they are doing quite well. Jordan is correct about the Alexa Rank algorithms having serious limitations. Trust me I know this first hand. Next time do your homework thoroughly. If you don't like it here then LEAVE. Below is a little bit of data, since you seem to be the expert, you know how to break it down and what it all means.


Google Inbound Links: 82
Inbound Links: 28,439
Unique Monthly Visitors: 43,307
Organic Keywords: 12,580
Page Rank: 5

And BTW, their Alexa Rank doesn't suck.



"Though she be but little, she is fierce" ~Shakespeare | Powered by HD Coaching | 2014 Wattie Ink Triathlon Team | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Power13] [ In reply to ]
 
Power13 wrote:
h2ofun wrote:
AndyPants wrote:
Good grief. Go away or contribute or lurk. Your choice.

Dan & ST has no moral or legal obligation to put up with shit like yours.

AP


As usual, people like this post without their real name. Shows all I need to know about their true character

..


There are a number of legitimate reasons why people do not use their names on the Internet. A forum member's recent stalking of another through PM's is a great example. Who needs that kind of activity in their "real" lives, when jobs and personal relationships can be put at risk....

Fine, just do not attack others, IMO.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Not sure how I slammed you?

I'm sorry, I must have read your statement that I "spew BS" in an unintended manner. Please tell me how you really meant that if it wasn't in a derogatory way.

And I am aware that you didn't expect me to answer the question. However, I still answered it. And yet you come on here and then post some diatribe about how greedy we are and how we only make decisions based on the money and how we censor the shit out of this forum all because of what? We locked a thread on whether or not some guy might have cheated in Chicago? Or because we have a rule that you can't accuse someone of doping without proof? Or what?

You seem to feel that we censor the majority of information on here. We don't even censor an infinitesimally small fraction. The sum total word count of The New Testament gets posted on this forum approximately every two days (maybe less; that was the last time we did a word count: time check). We have THREE moderators. We all do a lot more than moderate this forum. Even if we wanted to censor a lot of stuff - which we don't - we couldn't. We do our best to try and keep some semblance of order and to keep threads from getting out of hand with regards to unfounded accusations. If you somehow feel you cheated by not being privy to that information, my short answer is I'm sorry. As I said, there's a thread for you here that we basically leave totally uncensored - http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ch_here._P1566945-24

For some unknown reason, I actually held off doing my actual job to try to address your concerns. Let me offer you a simple choice. Stay or leave. I don't care which. But if you stay, this is a TRIATHLON FORUM. That means your bitching and moaning about censorship doesn't belong here (in this particular forum). If you post another thread in here along those lines, I'll ban you and delete your account. If you want to stay and post, that's fine too. And you can even post more shit like this. Just keep this particular type of shit in The Lavender Room - which we basically run like Stockhouse, so you should feel right at home - so that I don't have to read it and waste my time on someone playing the self-righteous and entitled asshole.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Murphy'sLaw] [ In reply to ]
 
Murphy'sLaw wrote:
Frequenty Asked Questions? Who gives a fuck?

I understand frequently asked questions. But go back and read how he used FAQ. He used it in place of fuck. Hence me asking what the fuck is a faq

_________________________________________________
When all is said and done. More is usually said than done
Ba Ba Booey

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Rappstar wrote:
peterot wrote:
Not sure how I slammed you?


I'm sorry, I must have read your statement that I "spew BS" in an unintended manner. Please tell me how you really meant that if it wasn't in a derogatory way.


But he said "with all due respect..."


I spent some time as a mod on a cycling forum before realizing it was consuming my nights and running away screaming, and it's a thankless job that's a lot harder than it looks. There'll always be whiners, some more vocal than others, but you guys do a good job.
Last edited by: DrPete: Aug 28, 12 9:32
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
First. What Dan does is NOT censorship. He is not the government and there is no "right" to free speech on a private site. When you decide to post here you also agree to abide by the owner's rules.

Exactly; like others have said: His house, his rules

The Clash - Know Your Rights


"Number 3: You have the right to freeeee
Speech as long as you're not
Dumb enough to actually try it."


I don't mean that in a "Watch what you say or you'll get moderated by Big Brother" kinda way, but more like "Better to remain Silent and be thought a Fool than to speak out and remove all doubt. Abraham Lincoln" way

"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [KyraMorgan] [ In reply to ]
 
KyraMorgan wrote:
If you don't like it here then LEAVE.

I think there's a Last Word issue here at stake, otherwise I'm sure he would have by now

"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [KyraMorgan] [ In reply to ]
 
KyraMorgan wrote:

You clearly don't understand SEO. I just spent the better part of an hour slicing and dicing Slowtwich and they are not only growing, they are doing quite well. Jordan is correct about the Alexa Rank algorithms having serious limitations. Trust me I know this first hand. Next time do your homework thoroughly. If you don't like it here then LEAVE. Below is a little bit of data, since you seem to be the expert, you know how to break it down and what it all means.


Google Inbound Links: 82
Inbound Links: 28,439
Unique Monthly Visitors: 43,307
Organic Keywords: 12,580
Page Rank: 5

And BTW, their Alexa Rank doesn't suck.

Thank you.. I'm glad someone actually pulled legitimate info (seomoz and sem rush I'm guessing). When Jordan says they're keeping this inhouse and Slowtwitch.com has a PA of 72 and that many unique views, I'm impressed.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Please delete my account. Thanks.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Please delete my account. Thanks.

Don't go away mad...

just go away.

kthxbai!


float , hammer , and jog

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Murphy'sLaw] [ In reply to ]
 
Murphy'sLaw wrote:
peterot wrote:
Please delete my account. Thanks.


Don't go away mad...

just go away.

Oh C'mon

Do it RIGHT!!!

Motley Crue - Don't Go Away Mad

"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
 
Wasn't she profiled on the front page?

Hardly anonymous.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
 
Eh... as entertaining as this thread has become, why not just lock this thread and leave this buthurt fool to post on his stupid stock exchange forum or what ever it is. He will never get it.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
"Censorship is spineless."

slowman= spineless ???
Last edited by: Nick_Barkley: Aug 28, 12 10:16
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
Things are not the same since peterot left. ;-(

http://www.EpixGear.com
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
Who is going to start the first bring back peterot thread?

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
Things are not the same since peterot left. ;-(

I've just read this thread from start to finish, nothing to do with Tri, but good reading over a coffee, I have a problem........Are we sure he was ever really "here" ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X
If you run long enough....something is bound to happen
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
Things are not the same since peterot left. ;-(

He is still at ST member.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
 
Only because Jordan either a. hasn't read his post yet or b. hasn't bothered to delete his whiny ass yet.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
I would just like...

I would like a lot of things. I don't always get them.

If I owned slowtwitch I would definitely moderate it differently than they do. I regularly see fairly posting where people call each other assholes, slimy pieces of shit, and fling fuck-you's back and forth. But if I legitimately try to discuss the pros and cons of powercranks it gets deleted. I think that's pretty ridiculous. I've seen their arguments for why it is this way, and I agree to disagree with their logic that it makes ST a better place.

But it's not my forum, and they are under no obligation to listen to my (or your) feedback. They may run it this way for any number of reasons: makes their lives easier, financial benefit, they believe it's the "right" thing to do. Whatever it is... it's their choice not yours. What is so hard to understand about that?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [DougRob] [ In reply to ]
 
DougRob wrote:
Things are not the same since peterot left. ;-(

And he didn't even let Paulo know were we could find him.

Suffer Well.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [peterot] [ In reply to ]
 
peterot wrote:
Censorship is a significant problem whether you are first world or third and it should be address whether you are on a forum or dealing with gov. I am only 35 so I probably do have so growing up to do.

Maybe it is because I am a resident of a country which will deport me if I participate in political discussions (now THERE is an example of censorship for you) but many have said it again and maybe one more will sink in for you. If you don't like the "censorship" you see here, feel free to move one. This website was not created to Give You Information and support you. I know! Crazeee, huh? You are supposed to do that Yourself. It's called being a Big Boy. It really sounds like this forum is not for you, and TBH, sometimes it isn't for me. I skip a LOT of threads myself. I rarely get into the Lavendar room and even though I'm an old womens I also rarely get into the womens room.

If you need information so badly and are so dependent on it, then buy it. Pay for the service you're desiring. This forum is entertainment. Sometimes you can get good info and enlightenment, but really, if is just entertainment. If you are so desperate for information, pay for the service.

http://harvestmoon6.blogspot.com
https://www.caringbridge.org/visit/katasmit


 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [matto] [ In reply to ]
 
matto wrote:
peterot wrote:
I would just like...


I would like a lot of things. I don't always get them.

If I owned slowtwitch I would definitely moderate it differently than they do. I regularly see fairly posting where people call each other assholes, slimy pieces of shit, and fling fuck-you's back and forth. But if I legitimately try to discuss the pros and cons of powercranks it gets deleted. I think that's pretty ridiculous. I've seen their arguments for why it is this way, and I agree to disagree with their logic that it makes ST a better place.

But it's not my forum, and they are under no obligation to listen to my (or your) feedback. They may run it this way for any number of reasons: makes their lives easier, financial benefit, they believe it's the "right" thing to do. Whatever it is... it's their choice not yours. What is so hard to understand about that?

I agree there is no need for the attacks but ...

And YEP, I would love to be able to share experience with others who use the "product that cannot be named" to see how I can use them better. It seems to be fine to talk about using power meters, or run ideas, or wheel types, etc., but to talk about some of our use with the "product that cannot be named" it seems like we are talking about human killing or something. Why the folks who have never tried them are allowed to attack I will never understand. But these few go their wish and forced Frank Day to be banned. Frank has lots of great ideas, just like others on this forum, and we all lose by not having Frank be allowed to post, IMO.

I am looking forward to trying the "product that cannot be named" with a built in power meter. Would be great to use on the road to have the benefit of both for my training next season.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [matto] [ In reply to ]
 
matto wrote:
... But if I legitimately try to discuss the pros and cons of powercranks it gets deleted. I think that's pretty ridiculous.

Wow and now we add Powercranks to this thread. It just more awesome.


I just have to say that Crossfit..........

Ian
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [tkos] [ In reply to ]
 
tkos wrote:
matto wrote:
... But if I legitimately try to discuss the pros and cons of powercranks it gets deleted. I think that's pretty ridiculous.


Wow and now we add Powercranks to this thread. It just more awesome.


I just have to say that Crossfit..........


or to bring it into the gutter............Armstrong

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X
If you run long enough....something is bound to happen
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [TriTrev] [ In reply to ]
 

 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [gregk] [ In reply to ]
 
Cm'on Slowman. Just, "give him the gears" already.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [TriTrev] [ In reply to ]
 
TriTrev wrote:
tkos wrote:

Wow and now we add Powercranks to this thread. It just more awesome.


I just have to say that Crossfit..........



or to bring it into the gutter............Armstrong

Who will invoke Godwin's Law?

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [chriskal] [ In reply to ]
 
Unlike most of the people commenting on this thread, I agree there is too much censorship on ST.

Sure, Dan Empfield owns the site, it's his private property, and he gets to censor people and boot them off the site if he wants. Conceptually, all of that is true.

However, that doesn't mean that the censorship and exclusion always improves the forum. (Although I admit kicking Frank Day off was a tremendous improvement). For example, on a recent thread people were claiming that Dave Luscan was kicked off ST. I don't know if that is true or not. But, if true, that is a great loss to people like me who often asked Dave for help on many issues. Not only is he a knowledgeable tri and swimming coach, and a badass TT'er, he was always willing to help people on the forum over and over again with advice on power and positioning, racing strategy, whether to do specific races, sharing power files, etc. So IMO the fact he is "banned" is a big loss to the utility of ST for me, regardless of whether it was within Dan's right to do so. Does that mean I want to quit looking at ST? No, it just means ST isn't as helpful to me as it was before that decision was made.

I was just thinking recently that I wish ST had a formal "banned list" on a drop bar so we could know all the people that we aren't allowed to chat with anymore. That's my 2 cents.
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
 
BLeP wrote:
TriTrev wrote:
tkos wrote:


Wow and now we add Powercranks to this thread. It just more awesome.


I just have to say that Crossfit..........



or to bring it into the gutter............Armstrong


Who will invoke Godwin's Law?

Fine. Jordan is a jackbooted Gestapo wannabe and Dan is an ignorant slut. Happy? Herbert, well he's just follicularly challenged.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Slowman = Censorship [Pooks] [ In reply to ]
 
Pooks wrote:
"Slowman = Censorship"

Is that an assignment or comparison operator? I'm confused. In either case I suspect you have a type mismatch.

His classes aren't defined. I don't see a constructor. A really bad job.