HuffNPuff wrote:
I've never said it should happen, only that it will happen. I think my forecast is more realistic than yours. Next week, we'll find out.
Just so we are clear, my stance has never been on the should or shouldn't happen part either. IMO, I don't think there's a huge risk in doing sports outside with what we now know. I'd do an Ironman outside ten times before I set foot inside a gym to workout. The risk with outdoor endurance events is what happens around the event itself (crowded start/finish areas, indoor expos, check-in, athlete briefings, banquets, awards) and with volunteers. Seems they have mitigated the stuff that causes crowding (expos, check-in, briefings, banquet, awards) by either not having them or virtually having them or designating specific times with small numbers. I do have some concerns with volunteers still but sounds like all drinks and stuff have remained sealed so they shouldn't be able to finger fuck my drink cups and such, which always skeeved me out at events in the past.
The local govt should have a grasp on whether or not they can extend emergency services to the event. Not my call.
Where I always take a realistic view is the optics of events and how it can be perceived. Having something non-essential and frivolous in a locale that is experiencing an obvious trend in the wrong direction will just never play well with the majority of people. Lubbock was the prime example of this. Numbers started creeping up badly in the couple of weeks leading to the race. But the optics on November 7th in FL/Bay Co. will likely be different than November 14th or November 21st. I personally don't think the optics will look good come next weekend either if there's another 25% uptick next week but like I said... it might squeak in before the shit really starts hitting the fan and we start seeing numbers like we saw this summer.
Favorite Gear:
Dimond |
Cadex |
Desoto Sport |
Hoka One One