Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried
Quote | Reply
Surprised there hasn't been a thread on this absolute travesty, yet.

https://www.commonsense.news/...llion-crypto-scammer

From the "next Warren Buffet" to the next Bernie Madoff. SBFs net worth went from 13 billion to zero in one day. Probably a sharper trajectory than Elizabeth Holmes. A lot of other people and entities are out their investments as well.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Surprised there hasn't been a thread on this absolute travesty, yet.

https://www.commonsense.news/...llion-crypto-scammer

From the "next Warren Buffet" to the next Bernie Madoff. SBFs net worth went from 13 billion to zero in one day. Probably a sharper trajectory than Elizabeth Holmes. A lot of other people and entities are out their investments as well.

Probably not zero. He has some money squirreled away somewhere

I made the mistake of explaining to an admin yesterday how crypto is just a way to fleece people and people who "invest" in it are stupid. She then told me about her account. Oops
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Time for Peacock to make a TV movie about his rise, and fall.

But, more seriously, l wonder if this contagion fully spreads into other crypto as well, as other dupes finally pull their money out of this stupidity. And then there is a domino effect on the rest of the financial system. Well, hope not ...

Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook

--
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [DarkSpeedWorks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Time for Peacock to make a TV movie about his rise, and fall.

Michael Lewis Selling Movie Rights for Book on FTX's Meltdown (gizmodo.com)

"Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and The Big Short, has been following FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried for the past six months to write his next book. And while the potential ending of Lewis’s book has obviously changed in the past week since FTX’s $32 billion implosion, Lewis is already shopping around the movie rights, according to a new report from The Ankler."
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
a friend posted yesterday on the heavyweight calibre of intersecting company angels, from the FTC, MIT, Hillary's lawyer, the girlfriend's dad.

Expertise off the charts, and splat.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Probably not zero. Correct.

I found it remarkable that he was the second biggest political donor behind George Soros. With his money? Customers money?

Someone at JPM I think was trying to get Elon to work with SBF on Twitter deal and Elon said "no thanks."

In its Chapter 11 filings, FTX has suggested they have 1 MILLION+ creditors. Woof.
Last edited by: jkhayc: Nov 15, 22 7:51
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There's a meme floating around LinkedIn with Holmes and the FTX guy on covers of Forbes touting their successes.

On the Forbes cover wth FTX guy, there's a quote that he didn't understand crypto when he started his company. I replied on LI about Warren Buffett's "invest in what you know" strategy. But what does Warren know?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


RayGovett
Hughson CA
Be Prepared-- Strike Swiftly -- Who Dares Wins- Without warning-"it will be hard. I can do it"
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Bumble Bee] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bumble Bee wrote:
There's a meme floating around LinkedIn with Holmes and the FTX guy on covers of Forbes touting their successes.

On the Forbes cover wth FTX guy, there's a quote that he didn't understand crypto when he started his company. I replied on LI about Warren Buffett's "invest in what you know" strategy. But what does Warren know?

Greed will always be good. There are some very big names in that 1MM shareholder number. If he was a bank or investment firm, he’d had a nice bailout by now.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ChiTownJack] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ChiTownJack wrote:
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Time for Peacock to make a TV movie about his rise, and fall.

Michael Lewis Selling Movie Rights for Book on FTX's Meltdown (gizmodo.com)

"Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and The Big Short, has been following FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried for the past six months to write his next book. And while the potential ending of Lewis’s book has obviously changed in the past week since FTX’s $32 billion implosion, Lewis is already shopping around the movie rights, according to a new report from The Ankler."

“Hey, the guy that wrote The Big Short wants to hang out with me for months, that has to be a good sign!”

But wow, Micheal Lewis knows where to be.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well, "Moneyball" and "The Blind Side" are stories I wouldn't mind being written about/surrounding me or something I'd done.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
it sounds like there was a commune-slash-C suite in the Bahamas?

I am so excited for this movie.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [raygovett] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
raygovett wrote:

Wow, that pic is good !

Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook

--
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Its a fascinating story that is still playing out. A movie will be made of it, and there is zero change that Jonah Hill will not be playing SBF.

Don't forget that part of this FTX saga started earlier this summer with the implosion and bankruptcy of 3Arrows Capital and the Terra LUNA stable-coin fiasco.

Sam BF and FTX targeted both 3AC and Terra in an apparent vendetta and directly caused their demise which resulted in Billions of losses on its own, impacting thousands of people, all because of SBF.


.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Endo wrote:
Its a fascinating story that is still playing out. A movie will be made of it, and there is zero change that Jonah Hill will not be playing SBF.

Don't forget that part of this FTX saga started earlier this summer with the implosion and bankruptcy of 3Arrows Capital and the Terra LUNA stable-coin fiasco.

Sam BF and FTX targeted both 3AC and Terra in an apparent vendetta and directly caused their demise which resulted in Billions of losses on its own, impacting thousands of people, all because of SBF.


.

Kinda extreme to blame SBF for the fall of 3 arrows and Terra. They were going to implode at some point. That would be like blaming binance for what is happening to SBF. It is not binance’s fault SBF was running a scheme that would eventually collapse.

It was probably best for Luna and terra to collapse earlier than later.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
3AC held a lot of their funds on the FTX exchange and supposedly was stop hunted by FTX to trigger the liquidation. I forget the specifics but it was done through using Terra which also caused Terra to explode.

Just what I've heard and read as to what what happened behind the scenes. I don't think any of that was necessarily illegal? but the FTX exchange targeted one of their largest customers to liquidate them, not to forget the relationship of SBF, FTX and Alameda Research who were competitors to 3AC.

With SBF, FTX and Alameda Research unravelling, it puts it all in a different light what happened earlier with 3AC and Terra.

I for sure have seen tweets by Kyle Davies (co-founder of 3AC) recently which directly said what i'm describing...that SBF and FTX targeted 3ACs positions on the exchange and had a run through them through engineered means and caused their liquidation.

.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm curious to learn more about the post-bankruptcy account draining. With some of those funds already being traced to laundering on other crypto exchanges.

Could be a hacker.

But if it's an inside job, would love to learn how far up knowledge of it reached.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.
Last edited by: jkhayc: Nov 15, 22 18:20
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.

A) Going to jail

B) Didn't realize he was so connected to the Democratic establishment
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
He is bigly connected. His parents also. It's a wild story.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [DarkSpeedWorks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Time for Peacock to make a TV movie about his rise, and fall.

I see an American Greed episode in their future.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This is SBF, who is in control of a company valued at $30+ billion.

https://twitter.com/...ylPTg3J467CzZqYmUOwQ
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The writers are doing a great job of tying these two plot lines together.




Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
He is bigly connected. His parents also. It's a wild story.

Sam Bankman-Fried donated gave about $41 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting Dems).

Ryan Salame, another FTX executive, gave about $24 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting the GOP).

I think you will find they were making sure they had a finger in both parties.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.

That and Twitter is definitely not the best format for this complex of a story.

There is an awful lot of this that can really only be explained as intentional fraud.

Hard to see how he thought this was going to hold up for very long.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.

That and Twitter is definitely not the best format for this complex of a story.

There is an awful lot of this that can really only be explained as intentional fraud.

Hard to see how he thought this was going to hold up for very long.

Don't assume fraud when stupidity and ignorance will suffice. (Not completely dismissing fraud but these folks were clowns)

These people were inexperienced at trading risk management.

They were operating in an unregulated environment.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
j p o wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.


That and Twitter is definitely not the best format for this complex of a story.

There is an awful lot of this that can really only be explained as intentional fraud.

Hard to see how he thought this was going to hold up for very long.


Don't assume fraud when stupidity and ignorance will suffice. (Not completely dismissing fraud but these folks were clowns)

These people were inexperienced at trading risk management.

They were operating in an unregulated environment.


Unregulated doesn't mean inflating apparent value of assets isn't fraud. I guess you could say I didn't know I couldn't do that, no one told me I couldn't. But that sounds like something my brother would say. :)

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
windywave wrote:
j p o wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
Great thread

https://twitter.com/.../1592502805171822592

He didn't do the best at linking the thread but it's all easy to find. Really just epic failures at so many levels.


That and Twitter is definitely not the best format for this complex of a story.

There is an awful lot of this that can really only be explained as intentional fraud.

Hard to see how he thought this was going to hold up for very long.


Don't assume fraud when stupidity and ignorance will suffice. (Not completely dismissing fraud but these folks were clowns)

These people were inexperienced at trading risk management.

They were operating in an unregulated environment.


Unregulated doesn't mean inflating apparent value of assets isn't fraud. I guess you could say I didn't know I couldn't do that, no one told me I couldn't. But that sounds like something my brother would say. :)

I was thinking more of transferring customer assets

Inflating the price was manipulating the market but its an unregulated one
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Right, so he was bigly connected, like I said. Thanks for the elaboration.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You know it's bad news when the guy who handled the Enron bankruptcy says he's never see worse controls in his career.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [andrewjshults] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
People in crypto are doing more to keep it from being a viable alternative than banks could ever hope.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [TimeIsUp] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TimeIsUp wrote:
People in crypto are doing more to keep it from being a viable alternative than banks could ever hope.

Speed running the scams that caused the regulations on the financial sector.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [andrewjshults] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andrewjshults wrote:
You know it's bad news when the guy who handled the Enron bankruptcy says he's never see worse controls in his career.

"to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals, the situation is unprecedented," Ray continued."

That's harsh
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [TimeIsUp] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TimeIsUp wrote:
People in crypto are doing more to keep it from being a viable alternative than banks could ever hope.

Truth
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ho hum

The Bahamas looted FTX

https://www.cnbc.com/...nkruptcy-filing.html
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
chaparral wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
He is bigly connected. His parents also. It's a wild story.


Sam Bankman-Fried donated gave about $41 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting Dems).

Ryan Salame, another FTX executive, gave about $24 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting the GOP).

I think you will find they were making sure they had a finger in both parties.

All candidates and political parties that received money in the past year need to return it to the bankruptcy court for benefit of FTX clients. That money was essentially stolen.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
Ho hum

The Bahamas looted FTX

https://www.cnbc.com/...nkruptcy-filing.html


I'm not totally convinced "SBM" wasn't complicit in that, and is just pretending he was coerced to use "unauthorized access" to transfer assets out of the reach of U.S. bankruptcy courts.

"F--- regulators. They make everything worse. They don't protect customers at all."

That's rich. Given that he himself doesn't appear to have put any effort whatsoever into "protecting customers at all."

Pretty much all of my B.S. sensors are going off on the notion he fought tooth and nail to protect his customers against the Bahamanian government.
Last edited by: trail: Nov 18, 22 8:18
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
chaparral wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
He is bigly connected. His parents also. It's a wild story.


Sam Bankman-Fried donated gave about $41 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting Dems).

Ryan Salame, another FTX executive, gave about $24 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting the GOP).

I think you will find they were making sure they had a finger in both parties.


All candidates and political parties that received money in the past year need to return it to the bankruptcy court for benefit of FTX clients. That money was essentially stolen.

There are plenty of laws around fraudulent transfers. Bankruptcy doesn't run on an honor system. If we're going to demand politicians give back funds when they're not required to under BK law are you proposing we demand the same from the many, many, many charities FTX execs donated far bigger sums to?



"Are you sure we're going fast enough?" - Emil Zatopek
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Bretom] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bretom wrote:
H- wrote:
chaparral wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
He is bigly connected. His parents also. It's a wild story.


Sam Bankman-Fried donated gave about $41 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting Dems).

Ryan Salame, another FTX executive, gave about $24 million to candidates, political committees, and his Super PAC (mostly benefiting the GOP).

I think you will find they were making sure they had a finger in both parties.


All candidates and political parties that received money in the past year need to return it to the bankruptcy court for benefit of FTX clients. That money was essentially stolen.


There are plenty of laws around fraudulent transfers. Bankruptcy doesn't run on an honor system. If we're going to demand politicians give back funds when they're not required to under BK law are you proposing we demand the same from the many, many, many charities FTX execs donated far bigger sums to?

I'm not demanding anything from politicians. I'm hoping that they see that they have a moral duty to return the money to investors from whom it was stolen.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
don't know if there's any left man, that 50+ SPF is spendy



Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
I'm not demanding anything from politicians. I'm hoping that they see that they have a moral duty to return the money to absolute morons from whom it was stolen.

FIFY
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am seeing nonsense posts in Yahoo comments (I need to stop reading the things) where people have found a new conspiracy involving FTX, Ukraine and the Democrats.

They are saying that Ukraine took the money given by the Biden administration, and invested it into FTX. And that is why SBF gave $40M to the Democrats. They've accused Ukraine and FTX of helping launder money for the Democrats.

I don't know if it is russian propaganda meant to turn people off the US helping Ukraine, or if it is the typical nonsense we see from some of the conspiracy minded idiots in the GOP.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hard to know if this is an indictment of the broader cryptocurrency market or not. I bought a few bitcoin at an average of 3K each. I've always intended to hold onto them "forever" and then gift them to my kids. I've also always said I'd ride them to the moon or into the ground and it was probably one or the other. At one point my 12K "investment" was "worth" about 220K. Today, much less. This has always been "extra" money and was certainly never intended as a real investment. I enjoy watching it go up and honestly stop paying attention when it goes down. Then I enjoy watching it go up, then down, over and over. For guys like me whatever happens is really no big deal. For people trying to use crypto to make their fortune it could turn into a huge disaster, especially if they panic sell for much less than they paid. I don't pretend to understand it whatsoever.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
what i'd love to know is whether the fraud was the endgame, or a halfway house back to stability

am sure that will come out eventually. socking a lot of it into real estate a bad look, though
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [RINO Rick_pcfl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
RINO Rick_pcfl wrote:
I am seeing nonsense posts in Yahoo comments (I need to stop reading the things) where people have found a new conspiracy involving FTX, Ukraine and the Democrats.

They are saying that Ukraine took the money given by the Biden administration, and invested it into FTX. And that is why SBF gave $40M to the Democrats. They've accused Ukraine and FTX of helping launder money for the Democrats.

I don't know if it is russian propaganda meant to turn people off the US helping Ukraine, or if it is the typical nonsense we see from some of the conspiracy minded idiots in the GOP.

Ukraine laundering money for the Dems is nonsense. Too many tinfoil dots to connect and makes no sense.

What I have heard (nothing but pure rumor and no doubt politically motivated) is that Ukraine took some of the financial aid it has been receiving and was/had invested it in Crypto on FTX and may have had funds there lost in the blowup and subsequent hack. This is potentially more plausible, but has nothing to do with the "Dems".
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Endo wrote:
is that Ukraine took some of the financial aid it has been receiving and was/had invested it in Crypto on FTX

Possible, but it seems unlikely that Ukraine, at this point in time, would play investment games that might come to fruition in months/years. When just months ago it wasn't clear the current government would exist in months/years.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BREAKING NEWS

Sam Bankman-Fried, the FTX founder, was arrested in the Bahamas after U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges, the Bahamas government said.

Monday, December 12, 2022 7:02 PM ET

Mr. Bankman-Fried has been under investigation by the Justice Department over the sudden implosion of his $32 billion company that filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11.https://www.nytimes.com/...B&smid=share-url[/url]

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ironclm wrote:
BREAKING NEWS

Sam Bankman-Fried, the FTX founder, was arrested in the Bahamas after U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges, the Bahamas government said.

Monday, December 12, 2022 7:02 PM ET

Mr. Bankman-Fried has been under investigation by the Justice Department over the sudden implosion of his $32 billion company that filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11.https://www.nytimes.com/...B&smid=share-url[/url]


Good. I got the real sense this guy, like Elizabeth Holmes, just didn't know when to turn off the media tour and STFU. I guess when you've spent a decade or more with everyone fawning over your brilliant speaking that you start to think you can talk your way out of any problem.
Last edited by: trail: Dec 12, 22 16:14
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
ironclm wrote:
BREAKING NEWS

Sam Bankman-Fried, the FTX founder, was arrested in the Bahamas after U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges, the Bahamas government said.

Monday, December 12, 2022 7:02 PM ET

Mr. Bankman-Fried has been under investigation by the Justice Department over the sudden implosion of his $32 billion company that filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11.https://www.nytimes.com/...B&smid=share-url[/url]


Good. I got the real sense this guy, like Elizabeth Holmes, just didn't know when to turn off the media tour and STFU. I guess when you've spent a decade or more with everyone fawning over your brilliant speaking that you start to think you can talk your way out of any problem.

He's laying out the groundwork for the ignorant little lost lamb defense
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
trail wrote:
ironclm wrote:
BREAKING NEWS

Sam Bankman-Fried, the FTX founder, was arrested in the Bahamas after U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges, the Bahamas government said.

Monday, December 12, 2022 7:02 PM ET

Mr. Bankman-Fried has been under investigation by the Justice Department over the sudden implosion of his $32 billion company that filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11.https://www.nytimes.com/...B&smid=share-url[/url]


Good. I got the real sense this guy, like Elizabeth Holmes, just didn't know when to turn off the media tour and STFU. I guess when you've spent a decade or more with everyone fawning over your brilliant speaking that you start to think you can talk your way out of any problem.


He's laying out the groundwork for the ignorant little lost lamb defense

He was trying with his little media tour and basically throwing everyone else under the bus in the process. No one was buying it and he got on record with media with a horseshit story that won't hold up to examination. The other people involved should turn on him. I expect a lot of deals to be made by the people involved to testify against him. Unfortunately that means that a good handful of folks that are just as complicit as SBF will plea bargain for less punishment than they deserve.



.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Now Binance has had almost $1B of net outflow just in the past 24 hours.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Now Binance has had almost $1B of net outflow just in the past 24 hours.



Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
https://www.nytimes.com/...t&smid=share-url

BREAKING NEWS
U.S. prosecutors unsealed their criminal indictment against FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, charging him with fraud and conspiracy.

Tuesday, December 13, 2022 10:24 AM ET

The founder of the crypto exchange faces eight counts, including wire fraud on customers and lenders and conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and violate campaign finance laws.

Prosecutors for the Justice Department’s Southern District of New York unsealed a criminal indictment on Tuesday, charging Mr. Bankman-Fried with eight counts, including wire fraud on customers and lenders and conspiracy, including conspiring to defraud the United States and violate campaign finance laws.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil charges on Tuesday, alleging that Mr. Bankman-Fried misled investors who committed nearly $2 billion to FTX while also defrauding customers of the exchange.

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Rumor has it that Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Alameda Research, has been in New York last couple weeks (previously thought to be hiding in Qatar). Probably singing like a bird to the authorities.


.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Endo wrote:
Rumor has it that Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Alameda Research, has been in New York last couple weeks (previously thought to be hiding in Qatar). Probably singing like a bird to the authorities.


.

Based on what I read she's probably more culpable than he is for things at Alameda
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
Endo wrote:
Rumor has it that Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Alameda Research, has been in New York last couple weeks (previously thought to be hiding in Qatar). Probably singing like a bird to the authorities.


.


Based on what I read she's probably more culpable than he is for things at Alameda

Maybe, maybe not. She was only the CEO for the 3 months prior to leading up to the implosion.

Sam Trabucco was the CEO of Alameda for last years. He spontaneously stepped down to "go sailing and enjoy life", and Caroline assumed the CEO position. They are all involved. I do wonder if Caroline, while involved the whole time, i'm not sure she was the mastermind. Assuming all the shenanigans were going on for a long time, then Sam T was the main guy at Alameda.

Who knows, but I guess it will all come out eventually.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So this clown directly gave 46MM to Democrats against less than 300K to Republicans in 2020

It also appears he was the largest donor not named Soros to Democrats in the last cycle

Allegedly without any foundation and just according to him he was the second or third largest donor to the GOP via dark money. I'd like to see some proof of that if for no other reason to see how dark donations work

Obviously every single one of these politicians and groups should give that money to the estate or donate to an apolitical charity like kids with cancer
Last edited by: windywave: Dec 16, 22 19:10
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
So this clown directly gave 46MM to Democrats against less than 300K to Republicans in 2020


Sam Bankman-Fried says he's the Republicans' third-biggest donor, but used 'dark money' to avoid media criticism

Sam Bankman-Fried says he's the Republicans' third-biggest donor, but used 'dark money' to avoid media criticism (yahoo.com)

Quote:
the former CEO of the failed crypto exchange has now explained how he donated "about the same amount to both parties this year."

"I've been their third-biggest Republican donor this year as well," he said.

Bankman-Fried explained that this was "not generally known," because "all my Republican donations were dark."
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sam Bankman-Fried wasn't the only GOP mega donor at FTX. The CEO gave millions to GOP Congressional campaigns

Cryptocurrency magnate, new GOP megadonor, sunk millions into primaries | Washington Examiner


Quote:
Budding Republican megadonor Ryan Salame quietly shelled out $13.4 million of his personal fortune to boost 15 GOP congressional candidates in the just-concluded 2022 primaries.


Salame, a 29-year-old cryptocurrency mogul, lives in the Bahamas, which is the headquarters of FTX Digital Markets, the firm he oversees as chief executive officer.

Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Oh my God, the irony is just crazy.

"Salame, 29-year-old cryptocurrency mogul, lives in the Bahamas, which is the headquarters of FTX Digital Markets, the firm he oversees as chief executive officer. But he’s a native of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, and as a self-described “libertarian”-leaning Republican, he decided to get involved in politics this year because he believes the federal government is gravely unprepared for the next pandemic."

Right, because science-denying repubs are gonna make the US govt more prepared for the next pandemic!

This moron is too stupid to understand how funny he is!

Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook

--
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
So this clown directly gave 46MM to Democrats against less than 300K to Republicans in 2020

It also appears he was the largest donor not named Soros to Democrats in the last cycle

Allegedly without any foundation and just according to him he was the second or third largest donor to the GOP via dark money. I'd like to see some proof of that if for no other reason to see how dark donations work

Obviously every single one of these politicians and groups should give that money to the estate or donate to an apolitical charity like kids with cancer

Dem Senate Majority Pac stepping up to the plate and returning $3 million.


________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
windywave wrote:
So this clown directly gave 46MM to Democrats against less than 300K to Republicans in 2020

It also appears he was the largest donor not named Soros to Democrats in the last cycle

Allegedly without any foundation and just according to him he was the second or third largest donor to the GOP via dark money. I'd like to see some proof of that if for no other reason to see how dark donations work

Obviously every single one of these politicians and groups should give that money to the estate or donate to an apolitical charity like kids with cancer

Dem Senate Majority Pac stepping up to the plate and returning $3 million.

Stepping up to the plate?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:


Stepping up to the plate?

Have any other recipients of political donations from the FTX crew announced that they are returning donations? I could well have missed that if it is the case.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
windywave wrote:


Stepping up to the plate?

Have any other recipients of political donations from the FTX crew announced that they are returning donations? I could well have missed that if it is the case.

Many from both parties
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Excellent. The one I referenced was the first one I saw. I did scan this thread to see if anything mentioned here. Some here didn't seem to think there was any moral obligation to return donations.

Meanwhile, SBF is supposed to be extradited tonight. He insisted on waiving his rights to oppose extradition. I suspect he's finding prison in the Bahamas is no tropical paradise:

Quote:
In the week and a half since his arrest in the Bahamas, the Bankman-Fried has been held in a prison that US officials have described overcrowded, dirty and lacking medical care. Its crowded cells often lack mattresses and are “infested with rats, maggots, and insects.”
Prosecutors and attorneys for Bankman-Fried are discussing an arrangement for his release, with conditions, that would enable the failed crypto entrepreneur to avoid spending time at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The MDC is a pre-trial holding facility that former inmates and rights advocates have described as inhumane, citing frequent lockdowns, overcrowding and power outages that have left it without heat in the middle of winter.

Source CNN

I bet SBF has been repeating to himself, "I really, really, really f***ed up."

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
H- wrote:
windywave wrote:


Stepping up to the plate?

Have any other recipients of political donations from the FTX crew announced that they are returning donations? I could well have missed that if it is the case.

Many from both parties

How will the GOP return the millions in dark money donations SBF gave them?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well he's truly fucked.... Ellison and his co-founder already pleaded guilty in the Southern District earlier today.

Is naive doofus a viable defense?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
windywave wrote:


Stepping up to the plate?

Have any other recipients of political donations from the FTX crew announced that they are returning donations? I could well have missed that if it is the case.

I believe there was an announcement or something from the SEC or one of the agencies that anyone or entity that received funds/donations/etc... from SBF or FTX might be required by law in the eventual settlement of this to return every $$ they received, as it was all stolen customer money. So a lot of politicians are front-running what they'll be required to do by law later.

Props to Beto O'Rourke (D-TX) that received a $3M donation from FTX earlier this year, and ike a boss, promptly sent the money back with no thanks...way before all this started.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The CEO of a hedge fund and co-founder of a crypto exchange. How old do you feel right now?





"Are you sure we're going fast enough?" - Emil Zatopek
Last edited by: Bretom: Dec 22, 22 8:14
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Bretom] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bretom wrote:
The CEO of a hedge fund and co-founder of a crypto exchange. How old do you feel right now?


Old. But also somewhat competent at my job. (I do realize that at least the one on the left apparently sounded some alarms, but not very well, apparently)
Last edited by: trail: Dec 22, 22 8:16
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Endo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Endo wrote:
H- wrote:
windywave wrote:


Stepping up to the plate?

Have any other recipients of political donations from the FTX crew announced that they are returning donations? I could well have missed that if it is the case.

I believe there was an announcement or something from the SEC or one of the agencies that anyone or entity that received funds/donations/etc... from SBF or FTX might be required by law in the eventual settlement of this to return every $$ they received, as it was all stolen customer money. So a lot of politicians are front-running what they'll be required to do by law later.

Props to Beto O'Rourke (D-TX) that received a $3M donation from FTX earlier this year, and ike a boss, promptly sent the money back with no thanks...way before all this started.

Yup. Clawbacks.

Some of the politicians are donating the money to charities they are close to. This is a big mistake as that money should go to the creditors.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:

How will the GOP return the millions in dark money donations SBF gave them?


As I understand it, SBF didn't give any candidates dark money directly. Dark money goes to a non-profit that then distributes to candidates. So, initially, the onus is really on the non-profits that received the dark money donations from SBF. There will be records of this. We'll find out how much SBF gave to Republican dark money non-profits.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
Well he's truly fucked.... Ellison and his co-founder already pleaded guilty in the Southern District earlier today.

Is naive doofus a viable defense?

He's on his way to living at home with mommy and daddy again. Much stricter house rules now though.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:

He's on his way to living at home with mommy and daddy again. Much stricter house rules now though.

Poor mom and dad are getting dinged a bit by this too. They are both institutions at Stanford. And it's not a great look kicking it in their son's palatial Bahamas estate when he was arrested.

It's plausible they knew nothing of the illegality, though they were apparently at times involved in FTX-related activities. Nevertheless their Stanford academic reputations will be ever so slightly tarnished at best.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
H- wrote:


He's on his way to living at home with mommy and daddy again. Much stricter house rules now though.


Poor mom and dad are getting dinged a bit by this too. They are both institutions at Stanford. And it's not a great look kicking it in their son's palatial Bahamas estate when he was arrested.

It's plausible they knew nothing of the illegality, though they were apparently at times involved in FTX-related activities. Nevertheless their Stanford academic reputations will be ever so slightly tarnished at best.

In the real world the parents should get run out of town or have the sense to resign from Stanford.

On one hand, as law professors, they may well be understood to be clueless as to the real world (they just got their first real world lesson).

On the other hand, it's incredible that two law professors haven't got the sense (after Enron and Arthur Anderson) to say, "son, you have a tremendous responsibility handling billions of dollars of other peoples money, make sure you have got your internal controls certified by one of the big four."

I saw report that the accountant Aramino (or something) claims that they were not engaged to review the internal controls. That firm is toast. They should have walked away if there was no auditing of internal controls.

Daddy claims to be a tax expert and mommy was legal economics expert (must have heard of Enron).

If they weren't in on the scam, they are Mr. and Mrs. Magoo.

________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
were they turning a blind eye or desperately trying to figure out how to salvage/protect him?

from the outside it could look like the same thing. Clearly their efforts were weren't effective.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [H-] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
H- wrote:
He's on his way to living at home with mommy and daddy again. Much stricter house rules now though.

Not any longer.

BREAKING NEWS
Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, was ordered to jail after a judge in New York revoked his bail.

Friday, August 11, 2023 3:43 PM ET
Mr. Bankman-Fried had been under house arrest at his parents’ home since he was arrested in December on fraud charges stemming from FTX’s implosion.

Mr. Bankman-Fried, 31, had been under house arrest at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, Calif., since he was arrested in December on fraud charges stemming from FTX’s implosion. But at Friday’s hearing, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan said that arrangement would have to end, after prosecutors argued that Mr. Bankman-Fried had given documents to the media to intimidate a witness in the case.
The decision was the latest extraordinary development in one of the most dramatic corporate implosions in recent memory. FTX rode the highs of the cryptocurrency market to become one of the industry’s leading companies, before filing for bankruptcy after a run on deposits last fall. Over just a few weeks, Mr. Bankman-Fried went from an industry titan courted by politicians and celebrities to a criminal defendant facing decades in prison.

Now he will have to prepare for trial from a jail cell. The court dispute over his bail focused on an article in The New York Times published last month that described private writings by Caroline Ellison, an executive in Mr. Bankman-Fried’s business empire who also dated him. Ms. Ellison has pleaded guilty to fraud charges and agreed to cooperate with the prosecutors investigating Mr. Bankman-Fried.


clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dude still acts like he's operating in a world where he's way smarter than everyone else. Except he doesn't appear to be way smarter than everyone else.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
They dropped the political tampering and corruption charges on him a bit ago. At the time I saw it as just more corruption and politicians getting a pass again.

My legal friends think it is really a sign he's going to be royally and properly fucked. They say with the political tampering charges hanging on him, there would be a LOT of government pressure to tamp everything down and cover up as much as possible.

Dropping those charges means the Feds can unleash both barrels on him, unfettered.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bankman-Fried is found guilty on all seven charges.

https://www.nytimes.com/...-&smid=url-share

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Post deleted by spudone [ In reply to ]
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [spudone] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
spudone wrote:
Endo wrote:
windywave wrote:
Endo wrote:
Rumor has it that Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Alameda Research, has been in New York last couple weeks (previously thought to be hiding in Qatar). Probably singing like a bird to the authorities.


.


Based on what I read she's probably more culpable than he is for things at Alameda

Maybe, maybe not. She was only the CEO for the 3 months prior to leading up to the implosion.

Sam Trabucco was the CEO of Alameda for last years. He spontaneously stepped down to "go sailing and enjoy life", and Caroline assumed the CEO position. They are all involved. I do wonder if Caroline, while involved the whole time, i'm not sure she was the mastermind. Assuming all the shenanigans were going on for a long time, then Sam T was the main guy at Alameda.

Who knows, but I guess it will all come out eventually.

I haven't heard a peep about Sam Trabucco. Seems like he made out like a bandit.

Based on trial testimony I would not be surprised if he faces FCPA charges.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/...;region=text-section

Quote:
Former federal prosecutors predict the fallen FTX co-founder will receive at least 20 years in prison. That would be a harsher sentence than defendants in some other recent high-profile white-collar cases, including Elizabeth Holmes, who received a prison term just over 11 years last November for defrauding Theranos Inc. investors.

At the high end, federal sentencing guidelines could recommend what equates to a life sentence for Bankman-Fried, who turned 31 in March. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has been critical of the guidelines and often imposed more lenient sentences in previous cases before his court. But Bankman-Fried did himself no favors by rankling the judge, both before and during the trial.

The FTX co-founder has “shown a willingness and a desire to risk crossing the line in an effort to get right up to it, no matter where the line is,” Kaplan said during a July hearing.

Prosecutors had previously raised concerns about Bankman-Fried’s use of encrypted messaging app Signal to contact FTX’s US general counsel and suggest they “vet things together.” Kaplan called it an attempt at witness tampering.

Bankman-Fried also wasn’t allowed to use a virtual private network, outside of certain conditions specified by the judge, while on bail. The restrictions came after his lawyers said he used a VPN to watch football, including the Super Bowl.

Kaplan in August revoked Bankman-Fried’s bail after the one-time crypto mogul leaked to reporters the private writings of Caroline Ellison—the CEO of FTX’s sister hedge fund, Alameda Research, and Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend.

Krissoff said it’s “one thing to fight your case. It’s another thing to do what he’s done in the months since he’s arrested.”

Bankman-Fried’s testimony could also factor into the judge’s sentence. Over three days, Bankman-Fried denied defrauding FTX customers, portraying himself and others at Alameda as inexperienced at running a business.

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ironclm wrote:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/...;region=text-section

Quote:
Former federal prosecutors predict the fallen FTX co-founder will receive at least 20 years in prison. That would be a harsher sentence than defendants in some other recent high-profile white-collar cases, including Elizabeth Holmes, who received a prison term just over 11 years last November for defrauding Theranos Inc. investors.

At the high end, federal sentencing guidelines could recommend what equates to a life sentence for Bankman-Fried, who turned 31 in March. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has been critical of the guidelines and often imposed more lenient sentences in previous cases before his court. But Bankman-Fried did himself no favors by rankling the judge, both before and during the trial.

The FTX co-founder has “shown a willingness and a desire to risk crossing the line in an effort to get right up to it, no matter where the line is,” Kaplan said during a July hearing.

Prosecutors had previously raised concerns about Bankman-Fried’s use of encrypted messaging app Signal to contact FTX’s US general counsel and suggest they “vet things together.” Kaplan called it an attempt at witness tampering.

Bankman-Fried also wasn’t allowed to use a virtual private network, outside of certain conditions specified by the judge, while on bail. The restrictions came after his lawyers said he used a VPN to watch football, including the Super Bowl.

Kaplan in August revoked Bankman-Fried’s bail after the one-time crypto mogul leaked to reporters the private writings of Caroline Ellison—the CEO of FTX’s sister hedge fund, Alameda Research, and Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend.

Krissoff said it’s “one thing to fight your case. It’s another thing to do what he’s done in the months since he’s arrested.”

Bankman-Fried’s testimony could also factor into the judge’s sentence. Over three days, Bankman-Fried denied defrauding FTX customers, portraying himself and others at Alameda as inexperienced at running a business.

Does the "I'm stupid" defense ever work?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [kiki] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kiki wrote:
were they turning a blind eye or desperately trying to figure out how to salvage/protect him?


from the outside it could look like the same thing. Clearly their efforts were weren't effective.


This paints a pretty damning picture of their involvement.




Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)

No.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)

That is not what your article says. It says he was trying to come up with ways to spin this and restore himself. The list referenced had SBF noting at the top that all the spin ideas were a bit out there and not well thought out. He is a chameleon and formerly played the effective altruism to scam people. Then he wanted to play more games to twist the media and politicians.

No reason to try to spin this yourself and lie about what your article actually said. SBF is completely full of shit, nothing he says is believable unless it is "I plead guilty ".

Quote:
The list of ideas, prosecutors said, was evidence Bankman-Fried was "motivated to launch his redemption narrative and has already been thinking about how to spin it" — and should therefore get a long prison sentence.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan will weigh prosecutors' memo against one by Bankman-Fried's lawyers, who asked for a sentence of no more than about six years.

Bankman-Fried acknowledged his list of ideas was not very good.

"Note: these are all random probably bad ideas that aren't vetted," the document says at the top.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)


The dude is a fraud. No need to spin his lies as him being a Republican.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)


That is not what your article says. It says he was trying to come up with ways to spin this and restore himself.

That was my first thought as soon as I saw the headline.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ThisIsIt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThisIsIt wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)


That is not what your article says. It says he was trying to come up with ways to spin this and restore himself.

That was my first thought as soon as I saw the headline.

He played the fake Effective Altruism role to swindle liberals and politicians. He thought maybe he could now play the Woke is Bad card to curry favor with the conservative anti woke crowd to save himself and get new allies. FTX donated to both parties through SBF and Ryan Salame. SBF is a chameleon criminal and wants his money, drugs, toys, and video games back.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit

He fits in well his party, the GOP.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit

He fits in well his party, the GOP.

Ah, still in the midst of your fever dream. You are becoming way too much of a predictable partisan hack that will believe anything to help confirm your bias. What in the world are you using to make SBF now GOP? Your article proved your post wrong, if you care to read it past the headline. Come on, triple down and really make us laugh at your lies.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ThisIsIt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThisIsIt wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Sam Bankman-Fried considered going on Tucker Carlson's show and railing 'against the woke agenda' after FTX's collapse (msn.com)


That is not what your article says. It says he was trying to come up with ways to spin this and restore himself.

That was my first thought as soon as I saw the headline.

The poster of the article is a mentally ill ideologue. Once you remember that ignoring the perpetual inaccuracies they post should be your default interaction with them.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?

No, that is what I rebutted you with. You tried to imply SBF was a Republican GOP member all along and was finally admitting it. I pointed out your lie. You doubled down. Now very predictably you shift your point after being shown to be wrong and lying. Did you finally read past the headline? Did you wake from the fever dream?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?

No, that is what I rebutted you with. You tried to imply SBF was a Republican GOP member all along and was finally admitting it. I pointed out your lie. You doubled down. Now very predictably you shift your point after being shown to be wrong and lying. Did you finally read past the headline? Did you wake from the fever dream?

Why do you think lying grifters see the GOP as easy dupes as long as they parrot the Woke! talking point?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?

Quote:
Insults and personal attacks to deflect


Look in the mirror, that is your modus operandi. Funny you label your typical words as such when I use them back against you. You love to start your posts with "Wrong again", "Why do you lie?", "Your fever dream". And your typical first go to to argue is a personal attack or ad homenin on the author or publisher. When proved wrong you keep doubling down and getting angrier, followed by goal post shifting and pretending your point was not what you literally said. You have become boringly predictable to a T.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.


You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?


No, that is what I rebutted you with. You tried to imply SBF was a Republican GOP member all along and was finally admitting it. I pointed out your lie. You doubled down. Now very predictably you shift your point after being shown to be wrong and lying. Did you finally read past the headline? Did you wake from the fever dream?


Why do you think lying grifters see the GOP as easy dupes as long as they parrot the Woke! talking point?


Why do you think this lying grifter started with the known fake effective altruism act and had liberals eating out of his hand?
Last edited by: mattbk: Mar 16, 24 12:07
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?

Quote:
Insults and personal attacks to deflect


Look in the mirror, that is your modus operandi. Funny you label your typical words as such when I use them back against you. You love to start your posts with "Wrong again", "Why do you lie?", "Your fever dream". And your typical first go to to argue is a personal attack or ad homenin on the author or publisher. When proved wrong you keep doubling down and getting angrier, followed by goal post shifting and pretending your point was not what you literally said. You have become boringly predictable to a T.

As usual, no answer just deflection and insults. No surprise.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
windywave wrote:
mentally ill ideologue.

You, and Matt, are so predictable. Insults and personal attacks to deflect from the fact that SBF thought he might be able rally the GOP/Tucker groupies/Alt-Right behind his lies if he pushed the 'Woke!" talking points.

Why do you think lying grifters see your party as fertile ground?

Quote:
Insults and personal attacks to deflect


Look in the mirror, that is your modus operandi. Funny you label your typical words as such when I use them back against you. You love to start your posts with "Wrong again", "Why do you lie?", "Your fever dream". And your typical first go to to argue is a personal attack or ad homenin on the author or publisher. When proved wrong you keep doubling down and getting angrier, followed by goal post shifting and pretending your point was not what you literally said. You have become boringly predictable to a T.

As usual, no answer just deflection and insults. No surprise.

No answer? I've repeatedly answered while you have backpedaled, deflected, and shifted the topic.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
No answer?

Correct, you have not answered, just your usual insults and deflection.

Why do lying grifters see your party as fertile ground? Maybe it is because they have seen the success of GOP politicians like Ron DeSantis who rose to national prominence off his pathetic, and often unconstitutional, anti-woke jihad. They see outrage farmers like Tucker, Hannity, Kirk, Cernovich, Posobiec, etc. make millions off pushing grievance and fear. They see that the GOP has put wackos like Marjorie Taylor Greene in positions of power. They embrace conspiracy theories about elections, Clinton killing people, vaccines, Obama being a Kenyan Muslim, etc.

SBF is a lying grifter who thought he might find a home in the GOP because so many other lying grifters found a home there.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:

No answer?


Correct, you have not answered, just your usual insults and deflection.

Why do lying grifters see your party as fertile ground? Maybe it is because they have seen the success of GOP politicians like Ron DeSantis who rose to national prominence off his pathetic, and often unconstitutional, anti-woke jihad. They see outrage farmers like Tucker, Hannity, Kirk, Cernovich, Posobiec, etc. make millions off pushing grievance and fear. They see that the GOP has put wackos like Marjorie Taylor Greene in positions of power. They embrace conspiracy theories about elections, Clinton killing people, vaccines, Obama being a Kenyan Muslim, etc.

SBF is a lying grifter who thought he might find a home in the GOP because so many other lying grifters found a home there.


Word salad. You are really struggling here. You were so excited to call SBF a Republican you didn’t even read your article. Your original post gleefully stated SBF was a Republican and finally coming out, which was a lie everyone reading easily saw. You kept shifting until you argued the same original reply I gave you as if it was yours. SBF had a list of crazy hairbrained schemes to try to use as a last ditch Hail Mary before he goes to prison for a long time. He was the liberal darling and embarrassed all that fawned over him. Your attempt to make him a Republican is absolutely laughable. Your inability to admit anything when slapped in the face with the truth greatly diminishes any credence you have here.

This is pretty pathetic. Just hang you head, lick your wounds, and live to fight another day.
Last edited by: mattbk: Mar 16, 24 13:09
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
This is pretty pathetic.

Yup, your post was pathetic. Your inability to address why the GOP attracts so many lying grifters says a lot.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
This is pretty pathetic.

Yup, your post was pathetic. Your inability to address why the GOP attracts so many lying grifters says a lot.

Jesus. I should have taken Windy’s advice. You are just crazy. This is not the subject. You claimed SBF is a Republican, but keep changing things everytime proven wrong. All he had was some crazy notes with one of them a crazy plot to gain favor by going on Tucker to scream about Woke in attempts to save himself. You leapt on this to calm your brain by confirmation bias. He originally tried his games on your liberal party that fawned all over him. It blew up and now it hurts your internal dialog so you latch onto something to calm the conflicting thoughts in you head.

You just will never quit when wrong and keep changing the subject. Your original post in this discussion was utter fucking bullshit and no one fell for your lies. Give it the fuck up.


Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit

He fits in well his party, the GOP.

You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [LacticacidMCB] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
LacticacidMCB wrote:
You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.

Zero is a strong word. Item 1a in SBF's list of what he was going to tell Tucker, "While public contributions show one thing, you see another thing including super PACS."

And that's not a lie.

$20M to McConnell's One Nation, $3.2M to the American Prosperity Alliance. Supported a bunch of other Republican House and Senate campaigns.

He seemingly supported Democratic causes and campaigns openly and publicly, and Republican ones "dark" and quietly.

That said, I think you're 100% right that the GOP is not his party. Like Trump he has no sincere ideological convictions whatsoever. He just uses one party or the other as a vehicle to serve his interests as needed. While at FTX it was better to be more open in supporting the Democratic side because FTX/Alameda was steeped in Silicon Valley culture, which is quite "liberal." Peter Thiel and a few others notwithstanding.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:

You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


Zero is a strong word. Item 1a in SBF's list of what he was going to tell Tucker, "While public contributions show one thing, you see another thing including super PACS."

And that's not a lie.

$20M to McConnell's One Nation, $3.2M to the American Prosperity Alliance. Supported a bunch of other Republican House and Senate campaigns.

He seemingly supported Democratic causes and campaigns openly and publicly, and Republican ones "dark" and quietly.

That said, I think you're 100% right that the GOP is not his party. Like Trump he has no sincere ideological convictions whatsoever. He just uses one party or the other as a vehicle to serve his interests as needed. While at FTX it was better to be more open in supporting the Democratic side because FTX/Alameda was steeped in Silicon Valley culture, which is quite "liberal." Peter Thiel and a few others notwithstanding.


Hidden donations he said he made to Tiffany Fong in an interview, an industry social media journalist. The same person he revealed in text messages that his persona was a fraud. But he thought she would keep it private for some reason. His stimulants were a helluva drug...

Quote:
“All my Republican donations were dark,” he said, referring to political donations that are not publicly disclosed in FEC filings. “The reason was not for regulatory reasons, it’s because reporters freak the f—k out if you donate to Republicans. They’re all super liberal, and I didn’t want to have that fight.”


https://time.com/...political-donations/
Last edited by: mattbk: Mar 16, 24 16:28
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:

You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


Zero is a strong word. Item 1a in SBF's list of what he was going to tell Tucker, "While public contributions show one thing, you see another thing including super PACS."

And that's not a lie.

$20M to McConnell's One Nation, $3.2M to the American Prosperity Alliance. Supported a bunch of other Republican House and Senate campaigns.

He seemingly supported Democratic causes and campaigns openly and publicly, and Republican ones "dark" and quietly.

That said, I think you're 100% right that the GOP is not his party. Like Trump he has no sincere ideological convictions whatsoever. He just uses one party or the other as a vehicle to serve his interests as needed. While at FTX it was better to be more open in supporting the Democratic side because FTX/Alameda was steeped in Silicon Valley culture, which is quite "liberal." Peter Thiel and a few others notwithstanding.


Exactly.

SBF himself has said that he donated equally to both parties as part of a strategy to insure FTX's political power. During his trial they talked about the strategy of "giving to a lot of woke shit for transactional purposes" . SBF said he wasn't comfortable playing the woke game

This is not new, he told a reporter two years ago that "man, all the dumb shit I said. It's not true, not really." that his "ethics stuff" was "mostly a front." that “this dumb game we woke westerners play where we say all the right shibboleths so everyone likes us,”. They gave almost $40 million to the GOP, most of it illegally.

Mattbk is screeching insults to deflect from the fact that SBF, like so many other lying frauds, saw the GOP as a potential safe haven that would be receptive to him if he just babbled about "woke" on Tucker.
Last edited by: Nutella: Mar 16, 24 21:32
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [LacticacidMCB] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
LacticacidMCB wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit


He fits in well his party, the GOP.


You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


There is plenty of evidence that he directed millions in donations to the GOP and felt that he would receive a warm welcome there if he went on Tucker and complained about "woke". Given the large numbers of lying fraudsters who have found a home in the GOP it is understandable why he would think this.

Meanwhile it looks like he is going to be in prison for a long time. Yesterday prosecutors asked for 40-50 years.

Prosecutors seek from 40 to 50 years in prison for Sam Bankman-Fried for cryptocurrency fraud | AP News
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
This is pretty pathetic.

Yup, your post was pathetic. Your inability to address why the GOP attracts so many lying grifters says a lot.

Jesus. I should have taken Windy’s advice.

Yes you should have....deduct 3 points
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit


He fits in well his party, the GOP.


You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


There is plenty of evidence that he directed millions in donations to the GOP and felt that he would receive a warm welcome there if he went on Tucker and complained about "woke". Given the large numbers of lying fraudsters who have found a home in the GOP it is understandable why he would think this.

Meanwhile it looks like he is going to be in prison for a long time. Yesterday prosecutors asked for 40-50 years.

Prosecutors seek from 40 to 50 years in prison for Sam Bankman-Fried for cryptocurrency fraud | AP News

You're not doing yourself any favors here. The contentious point was that he was a Republican, which seems pretty unlikely. He was and is willing to do whatever to manipulate people to his own advantage, just because many members of the GOP are good marks, that doesn't make him a Republican.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ThisIsIt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThisIsIt wrote:
Nutella wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit


He fits in well his party, the GOP.


You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


There is plenty of evidence that he directed millions in donations to the GOP and felt that he would receive a warm welcome there if he went on Tucker and complained about "woke". Given the large numbers of lying fraudsters who have found a home in the GOP it is understandable why he would think this.

Meanwhile it looks like he is going to be in prison for a long time. Yesterday prosecutors asked for 40-50 years.

Prosecutors seek from 40 to 50 years in prison for Sam Bankman-Fried for cryptocurrency fraud | AP News


You're not doing yourself any favors here. The contentious point was that he was a Republican, which seems pretty unlikely. He was and is willing to do whatever to manipulate people to his own advantage, just because many members of the GOP are good marks, that doesn't make him a Republican.

In his own words he identifies as one.



I agree he is a shape shifter who aligns himself with whoever he thinks will benefit him. He clearly thinks Republicans, and the Alt-Right, will buy his BS.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
ThisIsIt wrote:
Nutella wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit


He fits in well his party, the GOP.


You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


There is plenty of evidence that he directed millions in donations to the GOP and felt that he would receive a warm welcome there if he went on Tucker and complained about "woke". Given the large numbers of lying fraudsters who have found a home in the GOP it is understandable why he would think this.

Meanwhile it looks like he is going to be in prison for a long time. Yesterday prosecutors asked for 40-50 years.

Prosecutors seek from 40 to 50 years in prison for Sam Bankman-Fried for cryptocurrency fraud | AP News


You're not doing yourself any favors here. The contentious point was that he was a Republican, which seems pretty unlikely. He was and is willing to do whatever to manipulate people to his own advantage, just because many members of the GOP are good marks, that doesn't make him a Republican.


In his own words he identifies as one.



I agree he is a shape shifter who aligns himself with whoever he thinks will benefit him. He clearly thinks Republicans, and the Alt-Right, will buy his BS.

That appears to be a strategy to garner some support, not a statement of his actual position. I'd be very surprised if he is actually a conservative/Republican based on what I've seen of him.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ThisIsIt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThisIsIt wrote:
Nutella wrote:
ThisIsIt wrote:
Nutella wrote:
LacticacidMCB wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
SBF is completely full of shit


He fits in well his party, the GOP.


You know better. There is zero evidence that is his party. He donated millions to Democrats.


There is plenty of evidence that he directed millions in donations to the GOP and felt that he would receive a warm welcome there if he went on Tucker and complained about "woke". Given the large numbers of lying fraudsters who have found a home in the GOP it is understandable why he would think this.

Meanwhile it looks like he is going to be in prison for a long time. Yesterday prosecutors asked for 40-50 years.

Prosecutors seek from 40 to 50 years in prison for Sam Bankman-Fried for cryptocurrency fraud | AP News


You're not doing yourself any favors here. The contentious point was that he was a Republican, which seems pretty unlikely. He was and is willing to do whatever to manipulate people to his own advantage, just because many members of the GOP are good marks, that doesn't make him a Republican.


In his own words he identifies as one.



I agree he is a shape shifter who aligns himself with whoever he thinks will benefit him. He clearly thinks Republicans, and the Alt-Right, will buy his BS.


That appears to be a strategy to garner some support, not a statement of his actual position. I'd be very surprised if he is actually a conservative/Republican based on what I've seen of him.


He successfully employed the effective altruism liberal bit and garnered much support from big names that thought he would give a bunch of money to their pet projects and foundations. His parents are activists and his Mom is big into effective altruism and imparted much information and ideology on him. He took this knowledge and used it to create a fake persona and manipulate people instead. He was big into stimulant drugs, video games, and stealing clients crypto deposits to support it all until it imploded. In the public eye he drove a crappy used Toyota Camry, wore baggy shorts, crappy shoes with big white socks, etc. "Look, he doesn't care about money!" But what about his $40 million penthouse... and $300 million in Bahamian real estate.
Last edited by: mattbk: Mar 17, 24 14:11
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
SBF is a lying grifter who thought he might find a home in the GOP because so many other lying grifters found a home there.

Wait I thought you said he IS a republican…?

Nutella wrote:
Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"

Oh yea you did say that. You’re totally full of shit.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Nutella wrote:

SBF is a lying grifter who thought he might find a home in the GOP because so many other lying grifters found a home there.


Wait I thought you said he IS a republican…?

Nutella wrote:

Turns out Bankman-Fried is a Republican who wanted to court the Alt-Right and go on Tucker and "come out against the woke agenda"


Oh yea you did say that. You’re totally full of shit.


SBF himself says he is a Republican.....but you knew that.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No I didn’t. Nobody else seems to have either. Stop lying.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
No I didn’t. Nobody else seems to have either. Stop lying.


Guess you missed this



SBF has been in the closet and now wants the world to know he is a Republican.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
No I didn’t. Nobody else seems to have either. Stop lying.

SBF had a list of crazy Hail Mary ideas to save himself. At the top of the list he noted these were bad ideas that were not vetted at all. Just a wild list he wrote while brainstorming how to reverse his status. The fact that Nutella latches himself to this drug induced silly list to prove SBF is a Republican is just pathetic. He also ignores that SBF chose to try to manipulate his "Dear Party" primarily. He only thought of a possible hairbrained idea of manipulating the right by being anti Woke(tm) after the left turned on him as their prior darling boy. This thread has become a perfect example of Nutella's extreme bias and the way he continually lies and manipulates, shifting, deflecting, insulting, making up positions people havent made to argue against. In this thread he called SBF a Republican without reading his posted article. Then gradually shifted to my rebuttal and tried to pretend that was his point and not mine, that SBF was just trying to manipulate the right for points. But he is still trying very hard to make SBF a Republican. Careful, I already lost 3 Windy points (which I plan to appeal shortly) so maybe take Windy’s advice ;)

Quote:
The list of ideas, prosecutors said, was evidence Bankman-Fried was "motivated to launch his redemption narrative and has already been thinking about how to spin it" — and should therefore get a long prison sentence.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan will weigh prosecutors' memo against one by Bankman-Fried's lawyers, who asked for a sentence of no more than about six years.

Bankman-Fried acknowledged his list of ideas was not very good.

"Note: these are all random probably bad ideas that aren't vetted," the document says at the top.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windywave wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
This is pretty pathetic.

Yup, your post was pathetic. Your inability to address why the GOP attracts so many lying grifters says a lot.

Jesus. I should have taken Windy’s advice.

Yes you should have....deduct 3 points

That's a bit harsh professor. -3pts is the bottom. I actually recanted and admitted being wrong. I think that alone would allow leniency. I argue for a -1 but would also accept a -2 for the extreme nature of my sin. Please accept my plea.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
He only thought of a possible hairbrained idea of manipulating the right by being anti Woke(tm) after the left turned on him as their prior darling boy.

Did FTX give $40 million to the GOP before or after "the left turned on" them?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
He only thought of a possible hairbrained idea of manipulating the right by being anti Woke(tm) after the left turned on him as their prior darling boy.

Did FTX give $40 million to the GOP before or after "the left turned on" them?

Nutella, The Black Knight... just give up already...


Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
No I didn’t. Nobody else seems to have either. Stop lying.


Guess you missed this



SBF has been in the closet and now wants the world to know he is a Republican.

Good grief are you being a complete moron. It must be on purpose because I know you’re intelligent.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Nutella wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
No I didn’t. Nobody else seems to have either. Stop lying.


Guess you missed this



SBF has been in the closet and now wants the world to know he is a Republican.

Good grief are you being a complete moron. It must be on purpose because I know you’re intelligent.

Not only that, but the article Nutella posted says the prosecution is using the silly hairbrained memo SBF wrote against him to show that he is not sorry and still trying to manipulate people to spin things.

Quote:
The list of ideas, prosecutors said, was evidence Bankman-Fried was "motivated to launch his redemption narrative and has already been thinking about how to spin it" — and should therefore get a long prison sentence.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan will weigh prosecutors' memo against one by Bankman-Fried's lawyers, who asked for a sentence of no more than about six years.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BREAKING: Bankman-Fried Gets 25 Years For FTX Fraud
By Rachel Scharf

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced in Manhattan federal court Thursday to 25 years in prison for stealing more than $11 billion from customers, investors and lenders of his now-collapsed cryptocurrency empire.

U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered the hefty prison term for Bankman-Fried, who was convicted of fraud, conspiracy and money laundering at a November trial. The 32-year-old former billionaire maintains his innocence and has vowed to appeal.

https://www.law360.com/...lsidx=0&nlaidx=0

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
With good behavior and influence, he's probably out in 15.

.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [ironclm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
From what I read today the fact that some of his risky bets are paying off means that most of his investors he swindled will be made whole. This probably helped him at sentencing.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
From what I read today the fact that some of his risky bets are paying off means that most of his investors he swindled will be made whole. This probably helped him at sentencing.


That is not what happened. The new replacement CEO has worked to recover funds in any way possible. He excoriated SBF to the judge for claiming what you posted.

https://www.bloomberg.com/...ms-in-fiery-rebuttal

https://cryptoslate.com/...bfs-solvency-claims/
Last edited by: mattbk: Mar 28, 24 14:21
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
From what I read today the fact that some of his risky bets are paying off means that most of his investors he swindled will be made whole. This probably helped him at sentencing.

Furthermore, even if this were the case why in the world would it benefit SBF. Even if it accidentally paid out it was illegal to even attempt with other people's money. Whether his illegal actions resulted in profit are irrelevant. He stole the money. This guy told his employees if there was a 50/50 chance for making the world better or blowing it up he would place the bet.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just posted what I read in an article this morning. Didn’t grab the link.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
From what I read today the fact that some of his risky bets are paying off means that most of his investors he swindled will be made whole.

The benchmark for "made whole" in this case has generally been whether their asset value as marked-to-market around the end of '22 (when FTX collapsed) can be returned as cash. Considering what's happened to financial markets (especially crypto) since then, that's an incredibly low bar, and the clients will likely lose a ton from opportunity cost even if they get a >100% payout.
Last edited by: HTupolev: Mar 28, 24 14:48
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
I just posted what I read in an article this morning. Didn’t grab the link.

Yeah, SBF is a bullshitter. The positives are from the fixer CEO. He was the Enron fixer.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well there was a few things mentioned that SBF did. Put a bunch of money into some AI company. It’s up about 200%

Solana is up big time.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
HTupolev wrote:
BLeP wrote:
From what I read today the fact that some of his risky bets are paying off means that most of his investors he swindled will be made whole.

The benchmark for "made whole" in this case has generally been whether their asset value as marked-to-market around the end of '22 (when FTX collapsed) can be returned as cash. Considering what's happened to financial markets (especially crypto) since then, that's an incredibly low bar, and the clients will likely lose a ton from opportunity cost even if they get a >100% payout.

Yes, the people SBF stole from want interest based on opportunity cost or what could have been made. Getting back 100% is akin to having just stuffed it under the mattress and allowed depreciation from inflation.
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
Well there was a few things mentioned that SBF did. Put a bunch of money into some AI company. It’s up about 200%

Solana is up big time.

He also lost a shitload of the money. Just because a few may return a bit doesn't in any way lessen the fact he stole the money.

Quote:
“As the lead professional of a very large team who has spent over a year stewarding the estate from a metaphorical dumpster fire to a debtor-in-possession approaching a confirmed plan of reorganization that will return substantial value to creditors, I can assure the Court that each of these statements is categorically, callously and demonstrably false,” Ray said.

Ray said that his team had to spend “thousands of hours” dedicated to “digging through the rubble of Mr. Bankman-Fried’s sprawling criminal enterprise to unearth every possible dollar, token or other asset that was spent on luxury homes, private jets, overpriced speculative ventures and otherwise lost to the four winds.”

According to the letter, FTX only had 105 bitcoins left on the FTX.com exchange when Ray took over. Customer claims neared 100,000 bitcoins.

Quote:
“Recoveries to customers and creditors depends entirely on the voluntary subordination of over $9 billion in governmental claims for fines and penalties otherwise payable as a result of Mr. Bankman-Fried’s crimes,” he said.

Bankman-Fried lives a life of “delusion” if he believes that FTX was either solvent or safe when he left in November of 2022, Ray added.

Despite certain assets or investments rising in value — like FTX’s stake in Anthropic — Ray believes that the court should look closely at the damage done to former customers through the mismanagement of the exchange.

“I can clearly reflect on that time and I am quite confident that but for the work of a very large team of dedicated individuals, billions of dollars would have been lost or stolen and the recoveries to customers would be a fraction of their expected recovery,” he added.

https://blockworks.co/...on-government-claims
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For some reason you seem to think I am defending the shitbag.

I am merely pointing out that had some of these bets not paid off he’d likely have received a much harsher sentence.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
For some reason you seem to think I am defending the shitbag.

I am merely pointing out that had some of these bets not paid off he’d likely have received a much harsher sentence.

Definitely didnt mean to imply that. I was pointing out that the vast majority of recovered funds had nothing to do with any speculative bet that didn't go bad. It was due to the horde of people working with Ray through bankruptcy. With 9 billion missing a few investments that went up were small comparatively. He made many very poor investments that he also vastly overpaid for in acquisitions, putting vast amounts of "goodwill" on the balance sheet. Plus I was disagreeing that any old bet that ended up appreciating would help him get out of jail earlier. Stealing money to gamble doesnt make it any less wrong if your gamble accidentally pays off. Rob someone and go to the casino. Your sentence shouldnt be lighter because you got blackjack or did well on craps in hindsight, or you placed a big bet on the underdog in sports and it clawed back some of the money you lost.
Quote Reply