Murphy'sLaw wrote:
sciguy wrote:
monty wrote:
And people keep bringing up this one example but keep leaving out that Björn's aero bar broke off at the beginning of the ride. See how fast you ride holding on with one arm for over a 100+ miles on a very hilly course. And even with that real handicap, he only lost about 10 minutes to an admitted fully doped to the gills pro tour peloton rider.
Seems like with all that information that it reinforces the closeness of the riders.
add to that the 10,000ft of climbing at Silverman making a much more of a "climber's" ride than a normal time trial make Bjorn's performance even more remarkable against a DOPED TO THE GILLS uber climber.
FIFY.
Where all these comparisons of pro cyclist times vs triathletes falls down is pro cyclists don't do 1.9K swim or 3.8K swim before a 90K or a 180K TT and they don't have to run afterwards. If you don't believe it, look how pedestrian the bike splits of Udo Bolts, Rolf Aldag, Laurent Jalabert, Chan McCrae were after they switched over to triathlon. Even Lance got smoked by Kienle at the Galveston 70.3....it's amazing how badly pro cyclist start to sucking at cycling after the swim, when they actually have to do with triathletes do.
Put a fully doped Tyler Hamilton in a freezing cold Lake Mead swim for 3.8K and then make him ride 180 and run a full marathon and suddenly Bjorn won't really look that bad.
Having said all that I am really curious what Richie Porte could pull off if he came back to triathlon (he was a swimmer in Australia growing up and did tris, then cycling). He is a pretty small guy, but I think with 6 months of training, he could put down a swim not far off the first pack and do a non moto aided sub 4:10 bike on a flat course like Brazil. It would be awesome to see. He is listed at 172 cm and 62 kilos so in the range of Tim Don