hiro11 wrote:
Pffft, there is a huge double standard in the treatment in doping in cycling. For example:
Bjarne Riis is still the official winner of the '96 Tour
Jan Ullrich is still the official winner of the '97 Tour
Marco Pantani is still the official winner of the '98 Tour
Erik Zabel still has all of his wins.
No one has said who actually "won" the Tours Lance "won"
Contador still has most of his results
Valverde was directly involved with Puerto and is the CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION
etc.
Going back a little further, no one seems to ever bring up that the great Merckx was popped not once but twice in the hardly-ever-tested, freewheeling 70s.
Hinault has a stack of skeletons twenty deep in his closet and he's up there every day on the podium.
Indurain is suspicious as hell (
https://www.podiumcafe.com/...think-maybe-its-time) but no one has made any effort to even investigate him.
Most major teams are run by ex-dopers or people associated with ex dopers.
etc.
Lance? Stripped of (almost) all results. Landis? Stripped of all results. Say what you like about Lance, but he's right about this: it's a bunch of bullshit.
All of this is indefensible, corrupt and ridiculous. Vino racing Tri is just one more example.
Bjarne never intimidated witnesses
Ullrich never committed perjury
Pantani never bribed the UCI
Zabel never had prior notification of tests
Contador never ran smear campaigns against detractors
Valverde never used business connections to destroy people's livelihoods
Hinault never encouraged the entire peloton to isolate riders for giving evidence against a doctor
Indurain never destroyed his teammates doping products out of spite because they were "riding too well"
Get the point?