Andrewmc wrote:
I simply dont understand, and have never understood the faux outrage about cycling
I watched every lance tour and every tour since maybe 82-84 onwards
These guys - going back a century - have always been monsters fueled by more than just bread and water
Lance was an absolute bastard towards those that threatened him by all accounts but the sanctimonious actions of the UCI, commentators and others in eliminating him and then white washing the other results is just bullshit
I think I saw a star that there is a two decade run of tdf winners who at one time or another
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...t_the_Tour_de_France It is horseshit that Lance was singled out during that period
They just happened to be far more disciplined about it
Now, was have people pushing the boundaries to the same extent with with TUE's and jiffy bags and big lawyers
Remaining fit and healthy for the entire season in one of the most demanding sports on earth requires some flexibility on the moral compass and that does not seem to have changed much in the sky era
Why do you call it "faux" outrage? I am actually outraged. I hate doping. I hate cheaters. I hate double standards. This isn't "faux", it is actually how I feel.
I don't care that all sports do it, I don't care that cycling is really hard, I don't care that some people get banned and others don't. I don't care that it is close to impossible to eradicate doping. Doping is wrong, and is a big deal (for context - wrong like cheating on one's taxes, not as bad as, say, killing a guy).
I don't have any workable solutions to solve the doping problem but that does not mean doping is not cheating and isn't wrong enough to care about.