ericmulk wrote:
Slowman wrote:
Sluglas wrote:
So it sounds like the buoyancy was a feature, and not a bug, in convincing people to adopt wetsuit use (and convincing you to go into commercial production). It really wasn't about warmth, it was about speed. Is that fair? That really has to piss off the swimming purists.you bet buoyancy was a feature or, to put it another way, speed was a feature and whether it was buoyancy or hydrodynamics was a detail. i got the open water swim association's lifetime achievement award one year. half the attendees clapped. the other half scowled.
wetsuits are like viagra, or any other legal performance enhancer.
Actually, given the OW purists' visceral hatred of any swim gear beyond Speedo, cap, and goggles, I am really shocked that they gave you that award. I mean, to this day the Channel Swimming Assoc will not recognize an English Channel swim if done in a wettie, which is why I have never really thought of trying it. I'd have to gain 40-50 lb to survive 10 hrs or more of 55-ish water. :)
With the current FINA marathon swimming rules which allows wetsuits under 20°C, I'm feeling that the mainstream swimming community now accepts wetsuit as part of swim races which is a standard equipment in cold water. (I maintain a difference between solo channel-swim style swims and swim races as different disciplines in a sport).
However, I still maintain that wetsuit is a performance enhancer which should be considered a separate category in open water swimming races, because I need to do races non-wetsuit to prevent overheating when other people are putting their wetsuit on even in 22°C water!