Thanks Speed Racer for an objective and unemotional analysis. This forum thread is full of armchair lawyers and weekend warrior wannabees that think they understand the issues and have the facts, and dumbly think they can be judge, jury and executioner and get it right. Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty pays little attention to their rants anyway so it's comforting to know that their ramblings are pretty much irrelevant to most thinking folks.
SpeedRacer1 wrote:
If you weren't in the room to physically see said athlete cheat, then you really have no excuse or reason to throw said athlete under the bus. You can speculate AT BEST.
As for Weiss accuser, a known cheat....I give no weight to his accusations. All cheaters try to blame others to try and make themselves look a little better. And as in any court of law, I want HARD evidence. Heresay is about as far as it gets from hard evidence. You sure as hell can't be accused and found guilty in a court of law based on heresay. You have to prove your case.
I'm neither for or against Weiss. I just know I wasn't there to see jack shit. Neither were any of you and this case is just really bizarre. When someone is cleared and then a year later overturned, I smell something that stinks of political corruption.
