Hello
I think you use your core. You can't do without. Let me explain :
The real point is LATERAL ROTATION : I push on right pedal, and (sometimes) pull on left pedal. Logically, my butt should rotate left massively. So, what prevent my butt / hip to rotate left ?
The CORE
The CORE muscles prevent the hips to go left and right, curving your spine alternatively on both sides. They ensure the link between the hips and the torso, making possible to stabilize the hips LATERALLY using torso weight or anchor via arms/hands.
Personally, I stabilize my hips laterally (through core muscles) via torso weight and bike angulation left/right and elbow pressure on the pads, being relaxed on shoulders, arms and hands. Mantis not an issue.
In your case, I suppose if you express the need for a "strong foundation", probably it is not core weakness, but simply lack of stabilization through equilibrium. Core is not weak, simply it doesn't succeed in counteracting pedaling effect (lateral rotation, NOT vertical take off) with torso weight, so you use arms/hands. But the stabilizing forces are still transmitted via core.
I think this was also the case for Cancellara.
Look at Cancellara : it move quite a bit the torso, and apparently quite use the arms : reasons for flat bars ?
Now look at Wiggins (approx same weight, same power) : no torso move, relaxed in the arms/hand. Because of track background ? And going mantis easily (see its Hour Record position).
Core is used in both cases : you and Cancellara, to transmit arm effort to stabilize ? Wiggins and me (could be worse as a comparaison :-) to transmit torso weight to stabilize ?
Like the comparaisons ?
I think you use your core. You can't do without. Let me explain :
The real point is LATERAL ROTATION : I push on right pedal, and (sometimes) pull on left pedal. Logically, my butt should rotate left massively. So, what prevent my butt / hip to rotate left ?
The CORE
The CORE muscles prevent the hips to go left and right, curving your spine alternatively on both sides. They ensure the link between the hips and the torso, making possible to stabilize the hips LATERALLY using torso weight or anchor via arms/hands.
Personally, I stabilize my hips laterally (through core muscles) via torso weight and bike angulation left/right and elbow pressure on the pads, being relaxed on shoulders, arms and hands. Mantis not an issue.
In your case, I suppose if you express the need for a "strong foundation", probably it is not core weakness, but simply lack of stabilization through equilibrium. Core is not weak, simply it doesn't succeed in counteracting pedaling effect (lateral rotation, NOT vertical take off) with torso weight, so you use arms/hands. But the stabilizing forces are still transmitted via core.
I think this was also the case for Cancellara.
Look at Cancellara : it move quite a bit the torso, and apparently quite use the arms : reasons for flat bars ?
Now look at Wiggins (approx same weight, same power) : no torso move, relaxed in the arms/hand. Because of track background ? And going mantis easily (see its Hour Record position).
Core is used in both cases : you and Cancellara, to transmit arm effort to stabilize ? Wiggins and me (could be worse as a comparaison :-) to transmit torso weight to stabilize ?
Like the comparaisons ?
Last edited by:
Pyrenean Wolf: Oct 27, 18 14:04