logella wrote:
Quote:
For WTC this (rail crossings) are apparently a deal breaker
That's not a universal truism. We have a rail crossing on the bike at IMTX. WTC has worked with the railroad and the rail line is shut down on race day. This year there were two engine cars on either side of the crossing welcoming riders. I don't remember if they were there last year or not.
Good to know, I thought rail right of ways were a big no-no. I guess it depends on traffic and the agreements people can come up with the rail provider. Every potential venue will have its challenges. My experience is with Aus, CDA, Kona and Canada. No event was perfect but I came away with great memories from all.
The Issue I am having lately is some of the bike courses, I have done IMC 8 times now and for anyone riding over 5:15 there is a lot of drafting, contrast that with CDA this year and I rode 5:28 and everyone was spaced out 50-100 feet pretty much all day.
The difference appeared to be that CDA with their new course threw some pretty tough hills in right away to break people up, looks like challenge in Penticton may solve this with wave starts and (maybe) less people for the first few years.
We are looking at various bike courses for the Kamloops route and logistics and safety are obviously the first priority, the next thing I am looking for is a "fair" course or at least the "fairest" option. Meaning (my own opinion) that the hills should come hard and early to break people up.
We have a bunch of different route options but the one I drove yesterday Involved the Aschcroft "hell climb" over 3000 feet at 5% and about 7600 feet of total climbing. The route is pretty epic, stunning view points all along the way, I love this option but am uncertain that it will be "loved" by the majority. The other options are around 5000-6000 feet total climbing, similar to CDA.