mag900 wrote:
dannyboyjim wrote:
Waugh has to back it up this year. While an impressive breakthrough season, there were only a few good performances. The Grand Final was impressive, but a one off world class performance. SLT Toulouse was not a top field, and NEOM was the last race where most people were probably there for a pay check.
And the test event was good, but would not call it a world class performance. EdIt: defining world class is top 10% of the field.
She performed well, but she has to back it up. I also wonder if her significant improvement on the run over the season was maybe due to weight loss (hypothesis, as she looked lean towards the end of the season) - objectively her run improvement last year over the course of a few months was very impressive. Will be very interesting to see what she comes out with this year. Would love to see her back it up.
7th at the Test Event against the toughest field in 2023 when everyone was fully tapered is not a "world class performance"? Give me a break.
I've done a
quick check of last year's results Dannyboy.
Literally 7th at the Paris Test event is "not a world class performance" on your 10% threshold (64 started).
But
Effectively you are saying the only athletes you'd include as 'world class performers' (>2 top 6s) over the season are Beaugrand, Lombardi, Spivey and Potter: that's it! NB Waugh's #5 in Yokohama (so not 'one off').
Edit: Let's not forget, in the context of an MTR leg if nothing else,
Kate Waugh was crowned 2023 Super League Triathlon Champion. World Class!
On a separate tack, I am concerned that you hypothesise that weight loss might be a reason for Waugh's better run speed but bow to your ability to judge an athlete's leanness. Are there other athletes that you've judged in similar fashion? Please don't name them, but reflect.