Jackets wrote:
The Guardian wrote:
Jackets wrote:
The Guardian wrote:
stevie g wrote:
double olympic gold is b list?Long course. No one debates his short course cred. But people can free to keep holding on to the past if they want.
Put KB, Iden and Frodo (from a year ago) and AB on the line - who do you bet $10k on?
AB would be my last choice.
If you want to broaden A list to guys who can go fast and sometimes have a big race then I guess we can call AB A list - but then was have to add sanders and ditlev and skipper and a bunch of others. Which makes me wonder how far down we go for b list.
I don't really get this question, wasn't Ali and Frodo both injured this time last year? Blum and Iden were both coming off the Olympics?
If you're going to ask me who do I think would win if they're all fully fit and 100% (I think we're yet to see Ali 100% at LC) I'd back Alistair.
But this is my point - AB has been about 50/50 in terms of being fully fit and 100%. So it is hard for me to call him A list as he really is not a sure thing - despite having immense potential.
This is a fair point, as long as your definition of A list does not include two silvers at 70.3 Worlds, it's a prety high bar!
Those are indeed great results. But it has been a while. And yes for me it is a high bar. My “A list” comparable are the Tom Bradys and usain bolts, lance armstrongs, the Michael Phelps. In other sports these are possibly generational athletes, and the hall of famers and all stars are the a list. I don’t think we’ve seen enough depth or history to have a big slate of A listers yet.