Slowman wrote:
littlefoot wrote:
trail wrote:
littlefoot wrote:
As far as I am aware, there are not any warnings for people to limit exercise or activity after a shot. It MAY impact some.
I agree - forensics of all endurance sport-related deaths have been interesting to me. (marathon, swim, etc). And I'm sure those forensics will be done with this guy. But immediately jumping to "vaccine," I'm not sure is warranted.
This is an aside, from all my informal scanning of the forensics over the decades, we never really get an overall satisfying answer. The causes are myriad. Some had congenital issues they never knew about it. Some had undiagnosed disease. Some had diagnosed disease and knew they were taking a risk. Some are great swimmers. Some are questionable swimmers. Some bizarrely appear like healthy good swimmers who maybe just had a panic attack - maybe just accidentally getting one mouthful of water down a lung is enough to send someone into a bad state of mind.
I'm not immediately jumping to the vaccine and I don't feel the original post to which Dan responded to was either. All I'm saying is that it COULD have been a possibility to consider. That's it.
It shouldn't be brushed aside. It should be considered a possibility. And yes, there are many other possible factors that we don't or won't know about. I just felt like Dan's attitude was a bit off-putting. I feel he often displays a prideful attitude that shows he thinks he's better than others.
Someone died. Tragically. Someone isn't going home who came to race. Someone likely lost a dad, husband, brother etc. A poster made a statement about a possible reason to consider and he wasn't smart enough ( my perception of Dan's response).
That's all.
the post asked that question in post-49. i answered it in post-50. those interested can go back and see if i was off-putting or prideful and better than the person to whom i responded. then you jumped in, which is fine. but, again, neither you nor the person raising the question would provide an answer: what are we to learn, if he did?
i regret that you saw my post as off-putting, but i find off-putting the use of a death as a convenient political lever. i'm confident that wasn't your intention. but i can easily see this as the very sort of ideological hammer unfairly used to thwart the attempts of people of goodwill to overcome this pandemic. accordingly, i asked how one would go about establishing that nexus, and i guess i'm not going to get an answer.
Your question: "What are we to learn if he did?"
We could learn that maybe, for some individuals who get or got the vaccine it could cause a fatal response when they are involved in high aerobic or anaerobic activity within _ days of receiving it .
Again, it was a simple response by the poster (great scott) that may or may not have an answer. I think most can agree that the timeline of the vaccine is a quick turnaround (likely due to the worldwide focus and all hands on deck approach) and we don't fully know the possible side effects.
Im not saying there are side effects or that it will cause a death. The poster didn't either. He brought up a question to consider the possible impact.