Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: POWER CRANKS [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
Hey Dev, you're welcome :-)

What percent do you use PC's vs conventional cranks....how many hours on each in a typical hawaii build per week
100% on powercranks - about 10h a week

Is your wattage the same on both types of cranks
Hard to tell - no powermeter when biking on powercranks :-) (except when biking indoor but that is not comparable with race situation)

Is your cadence the same on both (I think your Kona cadence was averaging around 80 from the article)
Yes, my 'natural cadence is around 80 - both with and without powercranks. It used to be around 94 before I biked on powercranks. I am much more happy with low cadence because of lower metabolic cost

Do you use PC's to also supplement your run training and reduce overall run volume
On average I run 4-5h a week. But I almost didn't run in 2012 from june till the end of august and still did a 3h04 marathon in Kona...

What crank length are you on?
Usually 175 but I have experimented with lengths ranging from 130 to 182.5. It does not make a lot of difference in power output - I am mostly concerned about my position on the bike which I like best with 165-175 range.

Do you use PC"s outdoors or on trainer or both?
Both. But since I usually train after dark, mostly indoors.

Anyway, my opinion might be respected as much as everybody else's. However, if you have never trained for a reasonable amount of time consistently on powercranks, I think it is not fair to issue a strong (negative or positive) opinion.
Try them for yourself first and if you hammered them for 90 days and are dissatisfied, return them to powercranks and you will get your money back and you will be in a position to write something that makes sense here.

Kind regards,
Sam
samgyde.com

Thanks Sam for the visibility! What are your race plans for next year? By the way, I have had Powercranks for 10 years (going back to 2003), varying from 100% usage, to no usage to mixed usage. My best year was 2006 with mixed usage around 50/50. 2009 was also a good year going 100% PC's for the first half of the year and second half of the year was 100% conventional usage, where I had my best racing (both running and tri). Also 2009, I had my best XC ski race season ever, and unfortunately broke my ankle in crash. I was on 100% PC usage after the break to rehab my angle joint.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Beste Sam,

I think you are very fair in your assessment and appreciate you sharing your experiences.

There is just one thing that bugs me; the angle of "if you haven't used them, then you can't comment (properly)".

There are many things in this world that one can form an opinion on without actually doing it, and in many cases happily so. The validity of something can be assessed on the basis of (scientific) data, and (sometimes) that's even better, because the way we experience things isn't always the way it actually is. Too much cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias going on.

Groet,

Jacob
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jackmott wrote:
They appeal intuitively to people because part of the mythos of cycling is that a smooth, round pedal stroke is efficient. Thus it seems plausible that power cranks could force your body to adopt a more smooth, round pedal stroke where power is applied more evenly around the pedal circle.

Unfortunately, reality is that this idea has been thoroughly investigated and there is no evidence that evenly applying the power around the pedal stroke is more efficient, nor do the worlds best cyclist have round pedal stroke even if they think they do. ( lab and real world in agreement in other words)

It is an aerobic sport and pushing down, not pulling back or up, is actually the most efficient way to use your oxygen.

So anyway of course people suggest all kinds of indirect benefits because it is hard to cognitively accept something you have bought into is completely pointless. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/...oice-supportive_bias )

Not supporting Powercranks, but the arguments you make (and are constantly made on this forum) rely on several assumptions also. It is an aerobic sport, but muscles are part of the aerobic pathway. Using different muscles may or may not be a zero-sum situation (in terms of O2 availability). It may be that XC skiers cardiovascular systems can deliver more O2 to their muscles than cyclists, but unlikely.

In terms of what the worlds best cyclists do, that argument is based on the assumption that because elite cyclists ride a lot, and have done so for a long time, their mechanics have gravitated to the most efficient method (absolute not situational). That assumption may or may not be true, but there is no evidence either way. The fact that elite cyclists pedal a certain way is only proof that they cycle a certain way, not that it is the most efficient.

Powercranks are an unknown. Trying them is a leap of faith, where determining a training effect is likely impossible (certainly for an individual, but even in a study, constructing a true control is problematic).

There is no scientific evidence that they work. But at the same time, statements such as "it's an aerobic sport", while based on science, draw conclusions from data collected in different circumstances.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jackmott wrote:
They appeal intuitively to people because part of the mythos of cycling is that a smooth, round pedal stroke is efficient. Thus it seems plausible that power cranks could force your body to adopt a more smooth, round pedal stroke where power is applied more evenly around the pedal circle.

... as Stephen Colbert would say: "truthiness"
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [JV99] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JV99 wrote:
There is just one thing that bugs me; the angle of "if you haven't used them, then you can't comment (properly)".

There are many things in this world that one can form an opinion on without actually doing it, and in many cases happily so. The validity of something can be assessed on the basis of (scientific) data, and (sometimes) that's even better, because the way we experience things isn't always the way it actually is. Too much cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias going on.

I completely agree. I also didn't say you can't comment properly. I meant that forming a 'strong' opinion without any experience is not fair. There is not so much scientific data in this field and most studies around are not conclusive based on bad sample (sizes) - duration etc...
Problem on ST is that lots of people have a strong opinion that is neither based on experience or science or data...

One suggestion for scientific research:
- let people with imbalance between L/R leg bike - a group on PC and a group on fixed cranks. Check outcome after few months => these are hard studies to setup and to fund though...

I can come up with a few more...

But as I said, my experience is positive. And maybe not everybody will experience the use of powercranks the same way. But if you recommend or disrecommend something, you need at least 'something' to base those recommendations on that is strongly related to all aspects of the subject. Jackmot may say that pedaling efficiency doesn't matter and that it is all about the push and that may be true for some individuals and even for the majority but you can't relate that statement to the use of powercranks without long term study on powercranks use that measures this effect (or lack of it). My push actually got better thanks to/despite using powercranks all the time. Cognitive bias works in both ways...

In the meantime I stay biased in the pro-powercranks direction ;-)
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sn00zedoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I can echo Sam's comments about Powercranks. I wouldn't ride without them. Love them. I think the key is to use them when tired. Everyone can use them when they are fresh, the key is when you are dead tired do you opt for a bike without PCs because you are dreading the use of Powercranks? That is IMO when you really get strong and break thru performance barriers. At some point, PCs just become normal.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
I can echo Sam's comments about Powercranks. I wouldn't ride without them. Love them. I think the key is to use them when tired. Everyone can use them when they are fresh, the key is when you are dead tired do you opt for a bike without PCs because you are dreading the use of Powercranks? That is IMO when you really get strong and break thru performance barriers. At some point, PCs just become normal.


LOL....yesterday I did a 40 min PC ride + 30 min hard CT ride and then a 20 min treadmill run. In the afternoon I ran a total of around 100 minutes with the teenagers I coach spread between jogging, and hard 200-400m run intervals and A's and B's. Then I got home and decided to try riding the powercranks again on the rollers for 30 minutes. I barely lasted 15 minutes as my hip flexors were fried from the earlier workout and hard run intervals. This was over 3 hours into my day, so yes, I see where you are coming from.
Last edited by: devashish_paul: Nov 24, 13 10:19
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
I can echo Sam's comments about Powercranks. I wouldn't ride without them. Love them. I think the key is to use them when tired. Everyone can use them when they are fresh, the key is when you are dead tired do you opt for a bike without PCs because you are dreading the use of Powercranks? That is IMO when you really get strong and break thru performance barriers. At some point, PCs just become normal.


LOL....yesterday I did a 40 min PC ride + 30 min hard CT ride and then a 20 min treadmill run. In the afternoon I ran a total of around 100 minutes with the teenagers I coach spread between jogging, and hard 200-400m run intervals and A's and B's. Then I got home and decided to try riding the powercranks again on the rollers for 30 minutes. I barely lasted 15 minutes as my hip flexors were fried from the earlier workout and hard run intervals but this was. This was over 3 hours into my day, so yes, I see where you are coming from.

Yep totally understand. I used to have the PCs with Lockout and sometimes coming home from hard swims I would be like, "I just can't do it", and I locked them out. Then Frank swapped mine out for some prototype PCs (even heavier) and I had no choice. It did suck, but at some point my body adopted and I am a better, stronger, rider for it.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Poseidon2600] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
 

Quote:
Ok - I am relatively new around here but is the consensus that people don't like PowerCranks? Curious as I just bought them too! Did I miss something?


There's no question that the training benefits are qualitatively different. There will be more emphasis on the hip flexors with PC's. The disagreement is whether the change in emphasis is beneficial or detrimental to real world cycling conditions.

I've done most of my indoor training on PC's, and at one point I did a lot of high RPM work (100-110) on them which was very hard to maintain. I am now mixing up my training work, doing mostly lower RPM training on PC's and doing high RPM training (110-120) on a fixed gear. Hopefully the best of both worlds.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Dreadnought] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thank you all for the opinions. I am a terrible runner so I am hoping these help the run more than anything. I am that guy that you get to T1 and say, "I had a great swim how can someone be gone already", then you bike hard figuring you will catch that swimmer in no time only to never find me. You get back and find my bike in the rack. Within the first mile you catch me and I wave you by!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Member of FishTwitch - Arriving to T1 alone and watching you go by on the run.
My Blog: http://poseidom.wordpress.com
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [dforbes] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dforbes wrote:
logella wrote:
I've got my popcorn ready for this one.

This made me chuckle. We need a GIF now. On my phone so I'm too lazy!



AndyF
bike geek
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Poseidon2600] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Poseidon2600 wrote:
devashish_paul wrote:

By the way, starting threads on this forum about powercranks is technically banned. Just don't start a thread saying you were lifting weights, with Lance and the two of you went for a powercranks ride with Hincapie, and Travis Tygart saw you guys not using blood bags.
Dev


Ok - I am relatively new around here but is the consensus that people don't like PowerCranks? Curious as I just bought them too! Did I miss something?


Yes, an opportunity to use your money on something effective.

As for consensus, well plenty don't like training hard but it's very effective. Whether something is liked or not isn't a sound basis for judging effectiveness. Actual effectiveness is best for that and there is no evidence of such, only here-say, anecdote, personal bias and believed based thinking. Nevertheless, these emotive forms of appraisal have an undue influence for many people. It's the same reason why the supplement industry makes billions of dollars. Actual effectiveness is largely irrelevant for many, only the belief.

Good luck with your training.
Last edited by: Watt Matters: Nov 24, 13 17:13
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Watt Matters] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Watt Matters wrote:
[Yes, an opportunity to use your money on something effective.

As for consensus, well plenty don't like training hard but it's very effective. Whether something is liked or not isn't a sound basis for judging effectiveness. Actual effectiveness is best for that and there is no evidence of such, only here-say, anecdote, personal bias and believed based thinking. Nevertheless, these emotive forms of appraisal have an undue influence for many people. It's the same reason why the supplement industry makes billions of dollars. Actual effectiveness is largely irrelevant for many, only the belief.

Good luck with your training.

Unfortunatelly both sides of the argument tend to be based on dogma.

Is there unequivocal evidence for the superiority of conventional training methods? Unconventional methods such as PC's may or may not be better, but it's very hard to design studies to prove it one way or the other.

Sometimes anecdotal evidence is the best we can do. I say try it and see if it works for you.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Dreadnought] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dreadnought wrote:
Unfortunatelly both sides of the argument tend to be based on dogma.

Is there unequivocal evidence for the superiority of conventional training methods? Unconventional methods such as PC's may or may not be better, but it's very hard to design studies to prove it one way or the other.

Sometimes anecdotal evidence is the best we can do. I say try it and see if it works for you.

Well I don't know what you mean by conventional training methods, but the evidence for training intervention involving the fundamental principles of specificity, progressive increase in workload, and recovery as needed are overwhelmingly demonstrated in the scientific literature and have been for longer than most of us have been alive. But perhaps you don't consider such things to be conventional training methods?

These cranks on the other hand have not once demonstrated any efficacy over and above simply training when any reasonable level of scientific rigour has been applied to their use, and they do appear in the scientific literature multiple times, all with pretty much the same null finding. Careful of those that cherry pick data by the way, it's a common theme when evidence is weak or does not support your view.

What we do know is that riding these cranks makes you better at riding these cranks. But then the principle of specificity suggests that should come as no surprise.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sn00zedoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Get a set of Garmin Vectors!
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
As far as I am concerned, I will never ever bike without powercranks.
sgy wrote:
For A-races, I usually switch to fixed cranks 3-4 days before the race.


Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sn00zedoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
how to work power cranks?


plz define in short..

http://www.generic-cialis-rx.com/Finasteride.html
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Same as Thomas (except thomas was much faster than me at IM AZ... my excuse is I'm only 130lbs and the course is pretty flat ;-) ), I've been switching for years in between dual mode and standard Powercranks, last year went with dual mode again to do some crank lenght testing over the winter. Now that I don't need to test anymore I'm back to a very simple Powercranks Racing cranks in a fixed lenght, compact spider and no Dual Mode. Best I've ever had ! Look much slicker, easier to install a cadence magnet on them and the crank arm height being quite standard in the pedal thread area I can even use some pedals based powermeters ! Most of the time I'll use a Powertap G3 in the back (SRM on my race bike) with them though and add a cadence sensor on the left chainstay for better accuracy.

It takes some time to become a good Powercranks rider so be patient, don't get frustrated when it's hard and you will become a smoother biker and a better runner for it ! By how much... we all wish we could have a very good and scientific answer for it and unfortunately it's almost impossible to come up with a good one, all we can do is trust the progress we think we've made and other users think they've made. I understand it's not good enough of an answer for some people, 4-5 years ago I was in the same "is it good or crap" position and decided to make my own oppinion of it and bought some. I've never looked back and have kept using them since.

By the way Thomas, impressive race in AZ, congrats !!!
Last edited by: pyf: Nov 25, 13 6:11
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sn00zedoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A few more comments + a little deal:


- If you state - as some did - that there is research suggesting powercranks are/are not beneficial, post the link to the study. In that case it will easy for people to judge.
- Most people comment on the lack of evidence towards bike improvement - the biggest gains of powercranks use are running related though!
- I am still waiting for people who used powercranks extensively that have something bad to say about them.

Anyway, as I said before, if you are interested in knowing what the product can do for you, get a pair. If you are not happy with them, just return them after 90 days.
And if you'd like a 10% discount + free shipping you can use the coupon code sgy-st2013 which is valid until December 20th. Of course also with the option to return them after 90 days should you be unhappy...

Also, if you need advise on getting started on them, feel free to PM me. I am glad to help out.

Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [AndyF] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
AndyF wrote:
dforbes wrote:
logella wrote:
I've got my popcorn ready for this one.

This made me chuckle. We need a GIF now. On my phone so I'm too lazy!



hehehe, thanks! this thread WAS actually civilized for a bit. I'm worried it may start to turn soon though. To add my 2 cents, I've never used them, but the man who got me into endurance events, and whom I've created my own endurance event in his honor since his passing, loved them. Obviously this adds absolutely nothing here, but he liked them as he thought they did improve his running/hiking as he used them to train for 14+ IMs/FC 508 and his 3 summit attempts on Everest (3rd a success!). A very "A" personality like most on this forum, a surgeon, and someone who had zero time to waste. He didn't just use them a few times, he used them for at least a handful of years. And as others have pointed out, never had anything bad to say about them. Anyway, carry on and I love the GIF's, thanks people!



The Rat Snake:
A Tribute Race at Gilbert Lake State Park, Laurens, NY May 16 2015
Follow the Rat Snake on Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Pooks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pooks wrote:
sgy wrote:
As far as I am concerned, I will never ever bike without powercranks.

sgy wrote:
For A-races, I usually switch to fixed cranks 3-4 days before the race.

First quote refers to training of course but I guess most people got that :-)
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [Watt Matters] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Watt Matters wrote:
specificity, progressive increase in workload, and recovery as needed

OK, these are basic concepts that can apply to both PC's and conventional cranks.
Quote Reply
Re: POWER CRANKS [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
tucktri wrote:
So you race with them as well?


They are a training tool. Just like you have paddles for swimming for example. They make you work harder with the purpose of benefiting of the hard work during a race.

For A-races, I usually switch to fixed cranks 3-4 days before the race.

Why switch so early before a race. They are supposed to train you to apply greater torque with your pedaling stroke around the pedaling circle, if this is true, why do you want to revert back to your natural pedaling style for use in the race.
Quote Reply
Post deleted by Administrator [ In reply to ]
Re: POWER CRANKS [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:

- If you state - as some did - that there is research suggesting powercranks are/are not beneficial, post the link to the study.

That's not allowed.
Last edited by: Andrew Coggan: Nov 25, 13 7:45
Quote Reply

Prev Next