I'm aware that there are a thousand variables to the question I am about to ask. However, I'm just looking for a general answer.
If you look at the FTPs (functional threshold power) of many pro cyclists you see some pretty high numbers (over 5watts/kg with world class athletes). When looking at professional triathletes you also see very high numbers. I'd say between 4.0 and 5.0 watts/kg as an estimated average. Where 4.0 might be the "local pro" type and 5.0 might be the "world class pro".
I would venture to say that all of the athletes above worked their asses off to get to where they are. If the average Joe (someone who may not have all of the genetic gifts most of the best pros have) works their ass off how far can they get? How much of an impact does genetics have on an FTP? Could most athletes expect to get to 4.0 watts/kg? Higher? What do you think?
Thanks
Chris Thornham
Co-Founder And Previous Owner Of FLO Cycling
If you look at the FTPs (functional threshold power) of many pro cyclists you see some pretty high numbers (over 5watts/kg with world class athletes). When looking at professional triathletes you also see very high numbers. I'd say between 4.0 and 5.0 watts/kg as an estimated average. Where 4.0 might be the "local pro" type and 5.0 might be the "world class pro".
I would venture to say that all of the athletes above worked their asses off to get to where they are. If the average Joe (someone who may not have all of the genetic gifts most of the best pros have) works their ass off how far can they get? How much of an impact does genetics have on an FTP? Could most athletes expect to get to 4.0 watts/kg? Higher? What do you think?
Thanks
Chris Thornham
Co-Founder And Previous Owner Of FLO Cycling