slowguy wrote:
j p o wrote:
slowguy wrote:
j p o wrote:
DavHamm wrote:
softrun wrote:
windywave wrote:
softrun wrote:
Who will be the first critic who will dare to write a negative review about a black female Bond and expose himself/herself to being called woman hating racist?
You realize James Bond is still a white guy, right?
I know that. But if we have 007 Jane Bond and it flops who will be the racists to blame? Audience? Critics? Someone gotta be guilty...
Who did they blame when the Oceans XX (I forget) movie flopped?
I haven't seen that come to cable at all. Worse than the remade Ghostbusters?
It wasn't that those movies were redone with women. It was that they were redone with women badly.
It actually wasn’t terrible, but it was pretty blatantly just a female rip off of the regular Oceans formula.
So just like Ocean's 12 and 13 ripped off Oceans 11. And looking on the wiki's, better domestic gross and very similar critic scores on a smaller budget.
Not sure I heard an outcry when that movie was redone with men twice. Or Ghostbusters 2, wtf was that movie?
It isn't female casting that is causing the issue. It is bad remakes. Stop blaming the womins.
Well, there’s a difference, even if only conceptually, between a sequel to a successful movie with the same people, and “reimagining” a movie with an entirely different cast, especially going from a group of men to a group of women.
The main problem being, sometimes the desire to have an all woman cast, or to cast minorities, comes at the expense of making a movie with good acting or plot. Sometimes that’s true with sequels too, but ideologically, it’s different.
The all female Ghostbusters was bad because the writing was shitty, and the women were not entertaining in their roles.
It just adds insult to injury that people know the only reason that crap movie got made was to prove some sort of point about having funny women being just as good as funny men.
That part I can definitely agree with. I think I'd feel different about a female 007 than Ocean's or Ghostbusters. It would still be in the flow of the series. For the other two they came back many years later with no talk about the movies in the decade or two between movies and decided to trade on the name just to get a female-centric movie.
But if the writing, directing, and producing of any of those was top notch no one would be bitching. It wouldn't detract at all from the movie if it was good, but I agree, it does amplify it when it sucks.
It shows they were just riding a current trend to make a buck, not tell a story. I'm not sure Jar Jar is any less offensive if Darth is a woman though. So I'm back to it being the fact the movie sucked more than it being women.
How about they just stop shitting on previously good movies?
I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.