My first suggestion ... Reach to Dave Reid the RD on the survey when it comes out and make comments re: the run. He is a very good RD and his job in Sonoma County is challenging.
If I were racing I would prefer last years course to this years. It was 2 loops ... one loop was 8.5'ish the other 4.5'ish. The only out and back traffic was on the Greenway (cement) which is wider than the creek trail. For some athletes the two loop (long & short) was confusing ... which is baffling to me since the way it was signed, marked, described in race briefings etc. was clear. It is possible the course was changed for that reason. (I have not discussed that with Dave)
Some people have mentioned bottles getting launched and equipment strewn about etc because of roads. Our team does group rides here and we ride a lot those roads during race season. I can't recall one incident this year where we have had a bottle launch ... and we have a variety of hydration carrying options on a variety of bikes (BTA, rear, seat & downtube etc.). To my point ... there are a lot (not all) of athletes using stuff on race day they never train with (i.e. stuff strapped on 24 hours before the race & cheap, ill fitting water bottles), have broken or non functional equipment (inc. cages), have bikes that rarely get ridden or ridden outside, and choose not to do any sort of pre-race bike tune up. It is non only here but also at other races ...
The roads on the course overall are in best shape they have been in years and will continue to improve. HWY 128 corridor was previously very nice and now its the worst stretch of road on the course and needs attention (it is a state road where everything else is county / city)
I hope ya'll keep supporting the race, the county and Dave Reids efforts
EDIT ... I attached a pic of the race morning fog
-------------------------
Dave Latourette
http://www.TTENation.com