James Haycraft wrote:
leegoocrap wrote:
out of curiosity (and not aimed at anyone in particular) what do you all propose is the solution?
Anyone have anything helpful?
Better PR man to work with customers
More time testing the final product before release?
Stricter QC?
1) Someone that's not Nick and has a long and proven history of customer/technical service correspondence that can liaise better between the product and the consumer
2) More emphasis on solid, potentially heavier, construction. Give up some grams of weight for more reliability (don't post pictures of the Beta on a scale that say it's "simple" and "lightweight" but not include the 4 EXTRA bolts you need to make it not fail...as an example)
TriRig still seems like a one man show, although he constantly uses plurality when referring to TriRig (us, we, etc) so I don't really know how many people "they" have working there. But someone that works near whatever factories he (sorry, "they") have chosen might be useful. Additional overhead is a negative, but if he (/they) want(s) to be a boutique company that sells a high dollar product then I think those are necessities. And yea, someone other than Nick handling general marketing and customer service.
It's actually kind of crazy how many people have hit me up privately on ST and outside of ST about this thread. All sharing similar product failure stories. A lot of them around the OG Sigma (but also the Alpha C and X). Same thing each time. Stem snaps, rider goes down. Subsequent interaction with Nick is anything but positive. Rider/customer goes in another direction.
I think it's pretty unanimous that he
designs great products. But from a number of conversations I've had in private - one specifically with someone who has 20+ years of experience with product development and testing and has used TriRig products - it seem's pretty clear he still doesn't understand that side of the business. Or refuses to devote enough time to it - in his quest for making arbitrarily lightweight products. That, in addition to what we all seem to already know - that he sucks at customer service.
So in addition to what James details above, I'd say not necessarily heavier construction - but just more rigorous testing. And then iterating from there to ensure adequate product safety. I don't think anyone would disagree that if a product needs to be heavier to ensure it's safer, we'd take that trade all day.
That still wouldn't change my opinion of him or his products though. He's shown his cards from that perspective already. I don't care to support someone like that. Safe products or not.
"One Line Robert"