B_Doughtie wrote:
But again I think the issue is running is easy. It’s cheap. Tri is never going to be either of those by default. And again I don’t think it’s some internal memo “let’s fleece” everyone and cause the sport to dry up. So if that means the sport dries up, then so be it. At some point putting on 3 events on public properties and using public resources is costly. There is no way around that yet you’ll compare it to a run race that is renting a public park and complain about costs of tri? It’s almost disingenuous to compare the 2 because it’s no where close to a fair comparison. That’s what I’ll push back on.
We are looking at it from two different sides. You have a product, and are wanting me to spend money on it. And I have the wallet, and am trying to decide what to spend my money on. So from the consumers side, it’s absolutely fair to compare anything to anything, to convince me to get money out of my wallet, and give it to you. As that consumer, I’m a lot less concerned about how much someone has put into their product, and a lot more concerned about the value I get from my money. This is why things come and go and prosper and flop.
The guy who put on our two biggest local tris, is a friend, an IM, and co owner of a local race/timing company. I think the most I ever paid for his triathlons, was $60. Even at that, the numbers were falling, and during the summer, the company is busy putting on multiple running events every weekend. He’s never come right out and said it, but it was pretty obvious to me, that the tris were either loosing money, or not making enough, to divert attention from their bread and butter running events. It’s sad really, because I loved those triathlons. But on the flip side, he’s still the RD or timer for many of the running races I still do, with many of the same athletes competing.
Athlinks / Strava