NormM wrote:
southpaw wrote:
NormM wrote:
Yeah doubling the number of agents after having to walk back this " The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) removed the requirement that special-agent applicants carry firearms and "be willing to use deadly force" from a job listing." The history of political targeting. The cost and disruption to a business and the fear of targeting that can destroy a business or organization that are working on the margins month to month. Nothing to be to be considered about.I'm confused by your post. Removing the requirement for the tax man to be prepared to kill someone is a bad thing and is also somehow related to the targeted destruction of struggling businesses? Said destruction in an unspecified manner, since businesses that are operating within the law, even if audited, don't really have anything to worry about. Unless you're suggesting that they're gonna start shutting down law abiding businesses?
Help me out here.
ETA I purposefully glossed over the first part but in the interest of not perpetuating myths I'll just leave this here.
https://time.com/...nts-factcheck-biden/
Are you a small business owner? Do you have any understanding of the cost and time of going through an audit if you are not a W2 kinda guy, and the threat of the State and burying you with the power to crush you?
I remember when the GOP used to be the party of "Law and order". Do you also complain about not being able to drive 80 mph in a school zone while hammered because it is an inconvenience?
If you actually read the bill instead of parroting lies from Marjorie Taylor Greene you would see that enforcement is only half of the newly budgeted funds. Most of the funds are going to make it easier for people and small business to file. Easier for them to get answers from the support group. Easier to file on line.