Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmh wrote:
chriskal wrote:
You, you , you filthy rotten . . . Swim coach?


So this thread has me thinking - do large fake knockers impact your center of buoyancy? I’m thinking it would force your hips down and slow you down.

Is there a swim coach that can confirm?
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990

Thank you for proving my point.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [Moonrocket] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Moonrocket wrote:
jmh wrote:
chriskal wrote:

You, you , you filthy rotten . . . Swim coach?




So this thread has me thinking - do large fake knockers impact your center of buoyancy? I’m thinking it would force your hips down and slow you down.

Is there a swim coach that can confirm?

I'm not a swim coach but I'm willing to do the research.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [WelshinPhilly] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'll lend a hand... or two.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990

Thank you for proving my point.

If you think that proved your point you are illiterate or foolish...or both.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [Moonrocket] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Moonrocket wrote:
jmh wrote:
chriskal wrote:

You, you , you filthy rotten . . . Swim coach?




So this thread has me thinking - do large fake knockers impact your center of buoyancy? I’m thinking it would force your hips down and slow you down.

Is there a swim coach that can confirm?

Are you suggesting that a certain Representative from Colorado 3 has fake boobs?

You better back that up with some documentation, we don't want anyone to get frothy at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims.

Suffer Well.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmh wrote:
Moonrocket wrote:
jmh wrote:
chriskal wrote:

You, you , you filthy rotten . . . Swim coach?




So this thread has me thinking - do large fake knockers impact your center of buoyancy? I’m thinking it would force your hips down and slow you down.

Is there a swim coach that can confirm?


Are you suggesting that a certain Representative from Colorado 3 has fake boobs?

You better back that up with some documentation, we don't want anyone to get frothy at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims.

I'm not frothing at the mouth, but I am about to go into a tizzy.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990


Thank you for proving my point.


If you think that proved your point you are illiterate or foolish...or both.

I am about to have a Santorum all over me.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [SWEDE63] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SWEDE63 wrote:
I'll lend a hand... or two.

I have some experience as a motorboat captain that might come in valuable in this research.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990


Thank you for proving my point.


If you think that proved your point you are illiterate or foolish...or both.

I am about to have a Santorum all over me.

I'm not sure whether to give you congrats or condolences...

My point is not who the thread is about. It is applying the same standards.

If we reversed the political parties then on page one it would be shut down.

First we would get a few people calling poster an idiot, asshole or racist.

Kay comes in and questions their moral compass.

Nutella asks "Why do you lie?"

Et al says you sound stupid talking about this, you should be embarrassed for starting this thread...

Francois calls them a fuckwit...

Half a page and done.

But because some of you have a boner for Boebert this is on page#6 136 posts.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmh wrote:
Moonrocket wrote:
jmh wrote:
chriskal wrote:

You, you , you filthy rotten . . . Swim coach?




So this thread has me thinking - do large fake knockers impact your center of buoyancy? I’m thinking it would force your hips down and slow you down.

Is there a swim coach that can confirm?

Are you suggesting that a certain Representative from Colorado 3 has fake boobs?

You better back that up with some documentation, we don't want anyone to get frothy at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims.

I’m pretty sure she has said she has. Her employees have said she has. Not sure this counts as proof - but here is an interview with employees mentioning it.

https://www.salon.com/...d-is-a-sham_partner/
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990


Thank you for proving my point.


If you think that proved your point you are illiterate or foolish...or both.


I am about to have a Santorum all over me.


I'm not sure whether to give you congrats or condolences...

My point is not who the thread is about. It is applying the same standards.

If we reversed the political parties then on page one it would be shut down.

First we would get a few people calling poster an idiot, asshole or racist.

Kay comes in and questions their moral compass.

Nutella asks "Why do you lie?"

Et al says you sound stupid talking about this, you should be embarrassed for starting this thread...

Francois calls them a fuckwit...

Half a page and done.

But because some of you have a boner for Boebert this is on page#6 136 posts.


You are simply reading things that aren't there.

There are 3 groups of people.

The biggest don't think it is reliable:

first reply - I'm still on the fence about whether it's legit.
second reply - Me too... but their track record merits consideration.
third reply - this group is pretty slimy.


several replies not on the topic of the veracity


next reply - Pictures that are supposedly of her are on there too. I can't tell if they are her or not.


If they have done this and they are wrong they need sued into oblivion. And I'm with Trail, the methods of these guys are pretty sleazy and distasteful. I'd much rather she be voted out for being a moron and bad representative.


next - This PAC claims to be a coalition of Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters, but that does not ring true for the same reasons you and Trail find it distasteful.


next is in the camp of she deserves it true or not - I don't mind at all if this isn't fabricated.


next - here's a PAC we know next to nothing about, who are literally called "muckrakers," who have decided to torpedo a target for whatever reason. who's next, and why?


next - So let's pretend I believe all this.




The second smallest group says from what we know it COULD be true, let's wait and see, threatening to sue over something like this and not following through is shady.


And the last have come right out and said they don't care if it is true she deserves it.


You told the whole board they were frothy when no one except one poster, who has 124 posts in 17 YEARS and said he got too excited, did anything close to being exuberant.


Then you told Thom he was in a tizzy. Thom may do a lot of things, but tizzing is not one of those.


And then you struck a very low blow and called someone a swim coach.


Of all the links you posted above I just don't see any frothing, lathering, or tizzing. YMMV.


In the meantime, Boebert is still someone that really struggled to get a GED, thinks the church should be directing the government, sits in the House, and we argue over the definition of frothing and everyone.


I'm out. Feel free to have the last word. We are getting lost in the weeds over meaningless shit.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?

The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?

The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...

Hey, we agree. The fact that the leaders of the GOP are recruiting complete lunatics should trouble any real American.

Don't agree on the "Both sides" though. I have not seen any evidence of trolls being recruited to run for office.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...


Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.


If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990


Thank you for proving my point.


If you think that proved your point you are illiterate or foolish...or both.


I am about to have a Santorum all over me.


I'm not sure whether to give you congrats or condolences...

My point is not who the thread is about. It is applying the same standards.

If we reversed the political parties then on page one it would be shut down.

First we would get a few people calling poster an idiot, asshole or racist.

Kay comes in and questions their moral compass.

Nutella asks "Why do you lie?"

Et al says you sound stupid talking about this, you should be embarrassed for starting this thread...

Francois calls them a fuckwit...

Half a page and done.

But because some of you have a boner for Boebert this is on page#6 136 posts.


You are simply reading things that aren't there.

There are 3 groups of people.

The biggest don't think it is reliable:

first reply - I'm still on the fence about whether it's legit.
second reply - Me too... but their track record merits consideration.
third reply - this group is pretty slimy.


several replies not on the topic of the veracity


next reply - Pictures that are supposedly of her are on there too. I can't tell if they are her or not.


If they have done this and they are wrong they need sued into oblivion. And I'm with Trail, the methods of these guys are pretty sleazy and distasteful. I'd much rather she be voted out for being a moron and bad representative.


next - This PAC claims to be a coalition of Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters, but that does not ring true for the same reasons you and Trail find it distasteful.


next is in the camp of she deserves it true or not - I don't mind at all if this isn't fabricated.


next - here's a PAC we know next to nothing about, who are literally called "muckrakers," who have decided to torpedo a target for whatever reason. who's next, and why?


next - So let's pretend I believe all this.




The second smallest group says from what we know it COULD be true, let's wait and see, threatening to sue over something like this and not following through is shady.


And the last have come right out and said they don't care if it is true she deserves it.


You told the whole board they were frothy when no one except one poster, who has 124 posts in 17 YEARS and said he got too excited, did anything close to being exuberant.


Then you told Thom he was in a tizzy. Thom may do a lot of things, but tizzing is not one of those.


And then you struck a very low blow and called someone a swim coach.


Of all the links you posted above I just don't see any frothing, lathering, or tizzing. YMMV.


In the meantime, Boebert is still someone that really struggled to get a GED, thinks the church should be directing the government, sits in the House, and we argue over the definition of frothing and everyone.


I'm out. Feel free to have the last word. We are getting lost in the weeds over meaningless shit.

I agree we are getting lost in the meaningless.

I jump in threads a bunch to try to steer towards equality. Not equal outcomes but equal opportunities.

I dont feel equality of threads happens here. So lately, while very time restricted, I jump in more when I feel the balance has shifted and what would be shut down by some is left to go on and on and on and on ()
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [Nutella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?

The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...

Hey, we agree. The fact that the leaders of the GOP are recruiting complete lunatics should trouble any real American.

Don't agree on the "Both sides" though. I have not seen any evidence of trolls being recruited to run for office.

Not trolls, but "Wacktivists", to steal a term from Musk. We got Biden due to the extremists offered up. There has to be better, but reasonable candidates are boring. You can claim we voted in the boring guy, but he was far from good candidate. A place holder while the parties hopefully get their shit together. I dont think Mayor Pete could beat DeSantis. You can't just put up reasonable smart people, they have to have the personality to lead and attract voters. Look at many CEOs, they act as the personalities while a COO can bury their head and work.

The wacko troll "conservatives" are a major reason why Nate Silver says the democrats may overcome the large deficit they face in midterms according to his Deluxe Model. He hasn't been able to factor Roe in yet, so that may sway things as well.

Quote:
In the Senate and gubernatorial races, by contrast, individual factors can matter more. And the GOP has nominated — or is poised to nominate — candidates who might significantly underperform a “generic” Republican based on some combination of inexperience, personal scandals or having articulated unpopular conservative positions. This is not a new problem for Republicans: underqualified or fringy candidates have cost them seats in the Senate in other recent cycles.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/...-but-not-the-senate/
Quote Reply
Post deleted by spudone [ In reply to ]
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [spudone] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
spudone wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?


The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...


I think you're confused.

Biden got nominated because Trump was a shitshow, and also because the far left (extremists as you would say) didn't have enough influence to win a nationwide election with Bernie.


I'm not confused in the least.

If that's the best the left could throw out to "not be Trump" then they really suck. They need a complete overhaul of how crazy their extremist end has moved. Both have absurdly bizarre extremist ends.
Last edited by: mattbk: Jul 2, 22 12:41
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
spudone wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?


The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...


I think you're confused.

Biden got nominated because Trump was a shitshow, and also because the far left (extremists as you would say) didn't have enough influence to win a nationwide election with Bernie.


I'm not confused in the least.

If that's the best the left could throw out to "not be Trump" then they really suck. They need a complete overhaul of how crazy their extremist end has moved. Both have absurdly bizarre extremist ends.

Come on, man. There is a difference. I might be hard for you to see, but there is a difference.

Nearly the whole of the GOP has embraced the Big Lie and other extreme points of view that abandon constitutional principles while rejecting the principles and values that defined it for decades.

The current mainstream GOP is unrecognizable from 10 years ago, the mainstream Dem party isn't much different than they were a decade ago.

Suffer Well.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmh wrote:
mattbk wrote:
spudone wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?


The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...


I think you're confused.

Biden got nominated because Trump was a shitshow, and also because the far left (extremists as you would say) didn't have enough influence to win a nationwide election with Bernie.


I'm not confused in the least.

If that's the best the left could throw out to "not be Trump" then they really suck. They need a complete overhaul of how crazy their extremist end has moved. Both have absurdly bizarre extremist ends.


Come on, man. There is a difference. I might be hard for you to see, but there is a difference.

Nearly the whole of the GOP has embraced the Big Lie and other extreme points of view that abandon constitutional principles while rejecting the principles and values that defined it for decades.

The current mainstream GOP is unrecognizable from 10 years ago, the mainstream Dem party isn't much different than they were a decade ago.


The crazy loud ones are the ones heard. That is not what I consider mainstream. Mainstream wants it to go away. I dont really know anyone pro Trump. Most that hate the progressive liberals cringed when he opened his mouth and wished would shut up. However these people fear the far left woke as fundamentally ruining the world. The mainstream dems are siding with the loud mouthed woke more and more. So are companies. They are terrorizing the country with their social media mob justice. I want both extremist ends gone. Maybe the maga crowd will slink back a bit after the Boeberts and MTGs are gone. When DeSantis takes the nomination from Trump he will be severely weakened. That and Garland may pursue charges.

The dems are definitely not like they were 10 years ago. There is no god damn compromise anymore. Its all or nothing from both extremes and no one listens to the rest. I have plenty of ideas on what I would like to see best. However I dont think I should get that. It would be unfair to the large population of people who don't agree. Its not that they agree with each other either. But, no one should get their way for all they want. Compromise is what is needed. Trade-offs are needed, policies that reflect what a majority can live with are needed. So fuck the far left, and fuck the far right. As neither will give a damn inch.
Last edited by: mattbk: Jul 2, 22 13:30
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:


The crazy loud ones are the ones heard. That is not what I consider mainstream. Mainstream wants it go away. I dont really know anyone pro Trump. Most that hate the progressive liberals cringed when he opened his mouth and wished would shut up. However these people fear the far left woke as fundamentally ruining the world. The mainstream dems are siding with the loud mouthed woke more and more. So are companies. They are terrorizing the country with their social media mob justice. I want both extremist ends gone. Maybe the maga crowd will slink back a bit after the Boeberts and MTGs are gone. When DeSantis takes the nomination from Trump he will be severely weakened. That and Garland may pursue charges.

The dems are definitely not like they were 10 years ago. There is no god damn compromise anymore. Its all or nothing from both extremes and no one listens to the rest. I have plenty of ideas on what I would like to see best. However I dont think I should get that. It would be unfair to the large population of people who don't agree. Its not that they agree with each other either. But, no one should get their way for all they want. Compromise is what is needed. Trade-offs are needed, policies that reflect what a majority can live with are needed. So fuck the far left, and fuck the far right. As neither will give a damn inch.

Are you saying the DeSantis or trump will be severely weaken when DeSantis takes the nomination? I could see both things being true. If DeSantis takes the nomination, trump will run third party or encourage people not to vote and sabotage the GOP thereby weakening DeSantis. Or if DeSantis take the nomination it would only come because trump (and trumpism) is weakened. Which did you mean?

I doubt MTG or Boebert are going away. And that speaks to my point, their existence as representatives has moved the mainstream further right.

We agree there is no compromise and that the extremes dominate, but we disagree that the GOP hasn't been dominated by what would be considered extreme 10 years ago.

I'm with you on saying a hearty fuck you to the far left, but I will say a double fuck you to the anti-Constitutional (dare I say anti-American) mainstream GOP that is extreme.

Suffer Well.
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
j p o wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:


I just find it hypocritical that this site can froth at the mouth over unsubstantiated claims while immediately shutting them down in other cases. The difference seems to be political leaning. However Boebert is a bit special, I understand that. I have zero plans to defend her. Though I would hope more would pull back once some major claims were refuted, such as the timeliness of said hush money from Cruz where they claimed Cruz paid her $127k for prostitution.

I would guess there may be some truth to some of it..


Who froths at the mouth? Point those posts out for all of us. It seems, as usual, the forum is more or less in agreement. The article seemed fishy, probably had some truth to it.

Quit being a whiny victim.


As usual you come off a pompous swim coach. This fucking thread swim coach. Read it. Frothing at the mouth over unsubstantiated shit. Happens in many other threads. Do your own research, I'm not your secretary...


Well, I read the entire thread again.

There has been frothing all right. But it has all come from you.

From the very beginning everyone has been skeptical. No one bought it completely. The closest you come is some people saying they don't care, she is a POS and spreads lies so she gets what she deserves.


You might want to check the definition of that word... many on here were so excited at the possibilities. I find it pathetic that this flies only when a certain party is targeted. Target the other party with that little of anonymous info and a swarm of posters for that party would zoom in and shut the thread down...

Yeah. I don't need to. Everyone was skeptical of the reliability of the report. But nice attempt at a redirect.

Now you should look up "frothing at the mouth." And I was even giving you some leeway. I let you include being "excited at the possibilities" when the reality is "frothing at the mouth" means to be angry. And really there was only one who said they got too excited.

You keep making the assertion and it isn't backed up by evidence. If it is there, point it out. I know, I know, you aren't my secretary. That is nonsense. You are accusing people of something, back it up.

If you don't see the difference between the behavior here vs anonymous accusations against a lefty thread... I don't know what to tell you. Switch the political parties and this thread doesn't make it past a half page...

Since you need help, here you go with filtering... I even hyperlinked them which I shouldn't have bothered. Make me work, I should have given you some of your own...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761921#p7761921
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7761939#p7761939
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762050#p7762050
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762059#p7762059

Me calling out the guy who literally says he is getting too excited over this:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762096#p7762096
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762227#p7762227
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762240#p7762240
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762251#p7762251
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762277#p7762277
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7762288#p7762288

Then I posted the article that send Thom into a tizzy...

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767855#p7767855
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=7767990#p7767990

I think I'm "the guy" who you supposedly "called out" for making what was intended as a light-hearted joke. Your "call outs" need to get better. You're obviously not as tough and credible as you seem to think you are. But I can see how it would be easy to make a mistake when you're furiously trying to dominate threads. (Go ahead, "call me out" for this. Just let me know you're doing it, so I won't miss it again, because I'm obviously not as smart or as articulate as you.)
Quote Reply
Re: Muckrakers -the Boebert edition [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Nutella wrote:
Frothing aside it does appear that Cruz gave Boebert a lot of cash. Do you think that was for "services rendered" or because the GOP is no longer the "Party of ideas" but is now the "Party of batshit crazy trolls who spew lies and conspiracy theories in order to trigger the libs"?

The latter.

And that is what I found most disturbing in this revelation.

The seniors are helping recruit these extremists that froth up the voters.

The beard growing has been noticeable. Trying to wear flannel as well. Adopting a persona to appeal to "Chad"...

But I think the same is happening on the left. The players are becoming more extremist. Biden got nominated because all the other shit slung at the wall slid off like diarrhea...

But it was still slung, and more ammo/shit is ready to be slung from both sides...

Hey, we agree. The fact that the leaders of the GOP are recruiting complete lunatics should trouble any real American.

Don't agree on the "Both sides" though. I have not seen any evidence of trolls being recruited to run for office.

Not trolls, but "Wacktivists", to steal a term from Musk. We got Biden due to the extremists offered up. There has to be better, but reasonable candidates are boring. You can claim we voted in the boring guy, but he was far from good candidate. A place holder while the parties hopefully get their shit together. I dont think Mayor Pete could beat DeSantis. You can't just put up reasonable smart people, they have to have the personality to lead and attract voters. Look at many CEOs, they act as the personalities while a COO can bury their head and work.

The wacko troll "conservatives" are a major reason why Nate Silver says the democrats may overcome the large deficit they face in midterms according to his Deluxe Model. He hasn't been able to factor Roe in yet, so that may sway things as well.

Quote:
In the Senate and gubernatorial races, by contrast, individual factors can matter more. And the GOP has nominated — or is poised to nominate — candidates who might significantly underperform a “generic” Republican based on some combination of inexperience, personal scandals or having articulated unpopular conservative positions. This is not a new problem for Republicans: underqualified or fringy candidates have cost them seats in the Senate in other recent cycles.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/...-but-not-the-senate/

We used to do that, not too long ago. Wacky candidates have always been around but they could be controlled by the national party who controlled the purse strings. If they got out of line they were punished. That is not true now. Geatz, Boebert, Greene, Gohmert, etc are able to trigger a flood of money just by acting nuts and spewing lies.

Currently there is no "both sides" when it comes to wackos. The issue is orders of magnitude worse on the right.....but that does not mean it can't happen. Left wing populism is spreading through Latin America. Left wing populism could spread like wild fire here in America and be equally as damaging.

I am still hopeful that America will snap out of this nuttiness and embrace intelligence again.
Quote Reply
Post deleted by spudone [ In reply to ]

Prev Next