mattbk wrote:
Thom wrote:
mattbk wrote:
Well, if the sloppy person that posted incorrect information and documentation "remains confident", I guess that should be enough. Get your pitchfork, ill meet you outside in 5...
How many times have I said I'm willing to wait to see how this plays out? Where did I suggest anything like a pitchfork.
You used faulty logic, I pointed it out. You then assigned a bunch of, "lefty" positions to me that I haven't taken. Let me know when she files that lawsuit.
Nope, you are not all at getting it. They are wrong until they prove themselves right. The whole point is this would be shut down asap if some right pack used just anonymous resources. But further than that we now see the picks were fake, the dates of Cruz money were far off that it couldn't be for what they claimed. Think about how people treat a hunter Biden laptop story when it was just rudy and Co and so far by then unsubstantiated claims...
I dont care if its true or not. But this site shows its willing to accept highly suspect anonymous sources with proven incorrect information when it is a righty politician being attacked. Hell, even a LR poster knew the photo was a fake before I posted the CNN investigative article. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Don't know if any of the Muckraker stuff is true.
News yesterday had Tina Peters, County Clerk of Mesa County who is under indictment for election tampering, claiming Boebert told her to do it. Boebert is denying it.
Colorado primaries are today. Boebert may win. Tina Peters is running for Secretary of State and will likely lose.
Don
Tri-ing to have fun. Anything else is just a bonus!