Quote:
I wonder if aggression is not taught to the officers.
I can't speak specifically to police training, but for sure, when doing training in the military for security or law enforcement type duties, the training I went through could have been viewed as focused more towards aggression than the other way. Most of my training was conducted by Coast Guard, who has a primarily law enforcement role, and we were certainly taught to speak loudly and forcefully, giving commands, demanding the focus and attention of the person we're talking to. We weren't asking you to get down on the ground, or to put your hands behind your head, we were demanding immediate compliance with our instructions. The reasons were varied, but basically, if we're in that position, it's because something bad could be happening, and quite frankly, we're ok with hurting your feelings if it either prevents you from hurting someone or yourself, or prevents us from having to hurt you. We needed to get control of the situation as quickly as possible, and soft spoken polite request for compliance just don't do the trick.
That's not to say that yelling at someone is always the right answer, or that it never goes wrong, or that a soft spoken approach is never the right answer. But to answer your question, I feel like it's very likely (if their training is anything like what I've seen) that police are trained to be aggressive in gaining control of the situation as rapidly as possible, and then allowing for deescalation once things are firmly controlled by the officers.
Slowguy
(insert pithy phrase here...)