trail wrote:
Quote:
Cancer, heart disease, stroke deaths are an order of magnitude higher.
You're being cute here, though. In areas hard-hit by COVID, it was the leading cause of death, full-stop. E.g. here, where COVID deaths absolutely dominated deaths in NYC between March 11 - May 2. It's on track to the 3rd highest cause of death in the U.S. even though most areas haven't been hit anywhere near as hard as NYC. How you can be so casually dismissive as saying "death happens, so what" is beyond me. So takeway here is if we don't do anything to try and slow it down, it's unbelievably fucking bad. As opposed to just really bad if we do try to slow it down. You say I'm cute and to prove it offer up numbers that I posted -- in more detail -- in my first post yesterday, no. 134.
I agree with your takeaways.
Yet I don't think there is any harm with a comparative analysis of numbers in Georgia with those during the horrible spike in NY.
Quote:
How you can be so casually dismissive as saying "death happens, so what" is beyond me. Sympathy and respect are due to those who have suffered loss of loved ones. My recitation of covid death statistics would be inappropriate in a thread discussing the death of loved ones.
I considered this thread more a more public policy debate, i.e, what should Georgia be doing. Such a debate requires consideration of the relative magnitude of the current situation in Georgia. Public policy decisions always have a cost benefit analysis, including potential of causing deaths.
We can debate whether Georgia or Texas, Florida, or California should be imposing further restrictions at this point.
I lost my 85 y/o mother and my 84 y/o father this year. It is difficult so I'm not unsympathetic toward those in their 80s. Yet my parents both appreciated that they lived long good lives and were coming near their end.
Meanwhile, I coach inner city Alabama kids who attend, or will attend (maybe), a city high school were only 50% graduate. All the outlying suburban schools are starting on time with optional remote learning. All those kids will graduate high school and most go to college.
In contrast, city schools will be starting first 9 weeks remotely. Sad LOL for as a practical matter there will be no school for most kids for nine weeks. Poor kids will suffer more and have even less chances in life.
Tough policy choices.
________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev