heartpatient wrote:
a) Sebi won Kona 4 years ago, without a strong swim.
b) Sebi started triathlon (i.e. also swim training) before he became a teenager.
What do you think is more likely to happen in the next 1, 2, or x years?
(i) Lionel developing into a well-rounded triathlete with no weakness, winning Kona Frodo-style
or
(ii) Lionel becoming an (but not the only) exception to win Kona based on a strong bike-run-combo despite a weaker swim?
If I was him (or his coach) I would aim for (ii)...
Do I have to pigeon myself with those only 2 answers? Because I would choose option 3- come out with Sebi and only 3 mins down and you change our whole game plan. And so since LS and Sebi have swam side by side for years now in the pro ranks, except for yesturday, I see no reason why LS can't replicate what Sebi did yesturday.
Because I'm talking about winning the race- not podiums. And in this now new generation of Kona, you can't come into T2 behind the fastest runner in Kona and expect to win. So if your strategy is simply to accept that you can't swim, but be around the uber bikers, that's fine. You just better be on. And you better make a gap on Lange...sitting in his group isn't good enough. Bart rode in with Lange, and finished 4 mins down of Lange, there was not even a battle for 1st at any point in the day really yesturday. It was clear that Lange was bidding his time and he was in 1st by what mile 12, he won by what 0.67mi. Not even within sight.
And I dont think it's delusional to suggest that LS with good training can swim side by side with Sebi. So I'm not going to say he should only think about sitting with the Bart group now and forever.
Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II