sslothrop wrote:
cartsman wrote:
RandMart wrote:
big kahuna wrote:
Brian in MA wrote:
Another big reveal was Gilly mentioning how Raegars marriage was annulled so that he could marry Leanna in secret, therefore legitimizing Jon. Guess Dany will be the one having to bend the knee.Good grabs. I figured on the Rhaegar thing as soon as Gilly started talking about his annulment. If it's true that he did it so that he could marry Lyanna Stark -- and he did in fact marry her -- that would make Jon a Targaryen and Rhaegar's legitimate heir as well as the rightful king of the Seven Kingdoms, correct?
I'm wondering how long it's gonna take for Sam to say "Wait? Gilly? What was that you said about Raegar? Raegar Targaryen? Read that again!"
"We left the book at The Citadel"
"Well, fook it, we're goin' back fer it"
I was expecting him to stop halfway through his rant and do exactly that. I guess if he's now headed north then maybe they'll get the story from Bran and then Sam/Gilly will be able to provide the proof (on the basis that Dany isn't really going to go for "my slightly odd adopted brother saw it in a vision")
Meera said she's going to visit her father who was at the tower of Joy. I suspect that the news of john's parentage comes from him.
Maybe, but anything he says is basically only hearsay that he's got third hand (Lyanna whispering to New, who then tells him). A documented account by the maester who carried out the annulment (and the wedding?) would carry a lot more weight.