trimac2 wrote:
Dev-
How does this course compare to Mooseman? Its sounds like more up and downs but no real big climbs like Mooseman?
This course looks like its going to come down to with patience on the bike. No big power spikes....just ride steady as you can with the hills. Age groups will be won by how you pace that bike. I can imagine too many will over bike the hills and blow up on the run.
OK I can comment on this as I did Mooseman 3x. I did St. Croix, Mooseman and Muskoka all in 2012 and the splits on the bike for all three was close to identical around 2:50 and all within a watt of average power between them (I did them all around 207 AP), but achieved in very different ways given how different the courses are. As Cody said, it's a saw tooth bike course while means patience is required. Lately I have been playing around with my application of power on hilly courses because I feel that I go faster when I jack up my power over 100% FTP at the top of hills that have a downhill after them where I go are zero watts. If I were to do Muskoka again, I would likely apply that strategy for climbs that have a downhill right afterwards. I would do this for the half IM, but not the full though. The full is too long to spike power even with downhill recovery. As a low weight moderately decent watts per kilo rider, I feel this is a better application of my power in half IM. Applying power on downhills where my Cda is not good is a waste of my power resources.