QRNub wrote:
Quote:
1) No I simply used a word that aptly describes what some people think of Armstrong in this whole thing.
2) I think it's funny when people start demanding answers to questions that are clearly them trying to avoid the point being made and trying to set someone up to bash them. If you really were interested in my thoughts you would first discuss the point I have made a few times instead of trying to set me up. 1) Using a word is how things are brought up. If you're suggesting "kingpin" is inappropriate because events were happening before LA joined the team precludes it's appropriateness, you are wrong. Kingpins come and kingpins go. If you're suggesting that grown men gave in to doping with the others, okay. Forcing, encouraging, coercing, enabling, pressuring...what term would you prefer we use to describe LA's role?
2a) I don't need to set you up to be bashed.
2b)The question was actually my way of addressing your assertion that LA wasn't a kingpin. It's a coversational technique. One you have dodged twice.
1) you still dance around the point I made. Yes, kingpins change but the argument put forth, that I am disputing using what Tyler said, was that LA was the one who got USPS doping.
2a) You seem to like to go for the insults a lot.
2b) I have no need to answer because it's obvious it was simply you trolling and because it has nothing to do with the actual discussion. No matter how much you claim otherwise or try to insult me, that fact won't change.