ericM35-39 wrote:
how do you write this stuff about Hamilton and say what you do about Armstrong?
TriTrev wrote:
....and to all those that backed him both financially, and verbally, just another kick in the teeth.
He cheated, he got caught, he lied, and asked for assistance professing his innoncence for years.....nice, real nice
Eric, good call :)......My statement.....I know exactly how doping was done in the pro peleton for a number of years, in fact, I know how you still could dope and never get caught (Floyd almost had it right, but got drunk that one night)......do I think the LA doped, in my simple opinion yes, do I think he was the only one, I'm laughing as I type this, no.
The issue I have is there is no smoking gun, just a bunch of very motivated witnesses (intimidation by USADA is very motivating), and a whole bunch of scientific nothing....Justice should be blind, with no bias, it should be fair, and seen to be fair.....innocent until "proven" guilty, not alledged...........this point of view may go back to my relative being sent to the Virginia colony for "stealing a loaf of bread" (no trial, husband not told, despite her being pregnant, and that he owned the bakery !!!!)
Why do I think LA stopped fighting....eventually he would have been in the Roger Clemens position, with no opportunity to take the 5th, and having to prove his innocence instead of the USADA proving his guilt.....now the USADA will have to show their cards in a future hearing, and LA then restart the crap throwing.
Really just one positive test, just one, is that too much to ask for....this would have been so much easier, and this forum would have to find something else to throw monkey poo about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X
If you run long enough....something is bound to happen