BDoughtie wrote:
So by doing that, and apparently not removing this "dangerous" section, are they opening themselves up for the actual lawsuit to move forward?
I get that people seem to lack personal responsiblity. Just curious from a legal standpoint, if they are known to edit their software on some roads, but not others, if this case has atleast a chance to make it to court?
They (Strava) ONLY will remove a dangerous segment if it is "flagged" by a Strava user as being dangerous.
That's the only way they'd ever know about it, since, unlike Google, they can't monitor everything about everybody everywhere 100% of the time.
I once contacted Strava because a segment had been "flagged", and I thought that was ridiculous, as it was no more dangerous than any of the other roads in the surrounding area. So I requested that it be "un-flagged" and opened back up again.
Not sure if they ever did, or not.
PS - I just rode that "dangerous" segment last Thurs nite w/ a buddy.
We lived. PHEW!!!
float ,
hammer , and
jog