Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Aging of the IM field
Quote | Reply
I was looking at the IMLP start list. It’s not news that the M45-49 AG surpassed the M40-44 AG a couple years ago in size. This was the first time I noticed M50-54 surpassing M40-44 in size. I’m sure it has happened in other races, but this seems notable. Three years ago, the early 40s men were the most crowded AG. Now, as those guys have gotten older, there haven’t been a lot of new entrants to the sport behind them.

Also notable that for slot allocation, we could see races where you need to be top 3 in M40-44 to qualify. A 50 yo could grab what would have once been the fourth slot.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think this is indicative of when many of the current racers started and how few are coming in behind the current 10 year generation (45-55).



"Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go." T.S. Elliot | Cycle2Tri.com
Sponsors: SciCon | | Every Man Jack
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [indianacyclist] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This..
The entry for Nice and Frankfurt that came out today is ridiculous. €560!
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [TriByran] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The AWA priority price for Des Moines 70.3 is $325!!!!
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
They are gradually priming us for prices of $1000 for a full and $500 for a half.

Oceanside tier 4 registration will be nearly $500 after fees.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [indianacyclist] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol

Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sean H wrote:
The AWA priority price for Des Moines 70.3 is $325!!!!

And that was before a $30 service fee & $20 in taxes.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IMO this has more to do with demographics and generational differences than with folks’ financial situations.

I just bumped into 35-39 AG and I do not see a lot of folks either in my age bracket, or younger (25-29, 30-34) who are interested in the sport.

Folks who would have gone into tris in the past are going into cross-fit, tough mudders, video games or just are traveling/hanging out with friends.

Tris are seen as a mid-life-crisis type undertakings, where in the past you’d buy a sports car now you Lycra-up and get an expensive bike.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think both of the observations are correct.

The aging of the "participation generation" seems to be hurting the younger age groups in all participation sports -- even the reasonably priced races.

And silly-high entry fees naturally also skew the demographics of the entry list -- while making IM into a one-and-done bucket list event.

IM needs to take a lesson from golf. With an aging and dying demographic, golf participation has been falling for years. Hundreds of golf courses have gone out of business. A similar wave has begun in triathlon. It's time for the powers at the top of the sport to take measures to turn it around.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [FlashBazbo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
FlashBazbo wrote:
I think both of the observations are correct.

The aging of the "participation generation" seems to be hurting the younger age groups in all participation sports -- even the reasonably priced races.

And silly-high entry fees naturally also skew the demographics of the entry list -- while making IM into a one-and-done bucket list event.

IM needs to take a lesson from golf. With an aging and dying demographic, golf participation has been falling for years. Hundreds of golf courses have gone out of business. A similar wave has begun in triathlon. It's time for the powers at the top of the sport to take measures to turn it around.

Agree, yet wonder if triathlon is still "cool". It used to be a cool / bucket list / bragging rights kind of thing to do. That doesn't seem to be as prevalent as it once was across age groups. There could also be some resentment if you are way healthier than your peer group these days.

Sports these days need to be aware of what has been mentioned - video games - and reinvent themselves virtually. I think we have a better chance getting someone hooked on Zwift than riding on the road. Hopefully the virtual reality experience creates a desire to actually do it outdoors. Or I'm being too optimistic about that happening...

Indoor Triathlete - I thought I was right, until I realized I was wrong.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [FlashBazbo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I wonder if WTC can really make that change. Are they really doing a lot to attempt to attract new athletes?
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
One of the problems with current society is that the younger generation, as a whole, are not getting the kind of wages that earlier generations got.

Here in Toronto the average wage is pushing $60,000 pa, but I would defy most people to find anyone under 30 earning that. And that level of income is $100,000 shy of the income required to own a house. I had owned 6 houses by the time I was 30 and most of my friends had owned more than one.

What does this do to a sport that with time (which has a value), equipment, travel, and entry fees is fast becoming untenable for many, if they are to establish themselves economically. It's a problem in many sports that have become expensive in terms of time and money.

That the age groups are skewing to the older, established financially, sound populations is just one symptom of what will kill the sport if we don't get smarter.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have been in the biggest AG at every IM I've ever done since 2007.

Poon wrote:
I was looking at the IMLP start list. It’s not news that the M45-49 AG surpassed the M40-44 AG a couple years ago in size. This was the first time I noticed M50-54 surpassing M40-44 in size. I’m sure it has happened in other races, but this seems notable. Three years ago, the early 40s men were the most crowded AG. Now, as those guys have gotten older, there haven’t been a lot of new entrants to the sport behind them.

Also notable that for slot allocation, we could see races where you need to be top 3 in M40-44 to qualify. A 50 yo could grab what would have once been the fourth slot.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Liability costs have grown high, and right of way closures spike in costs as population density grows. Race directors aren't gouging prices, it's just expensive.

Triathlon hasn't been cool in a while, and even if that changes, it won't draw new people unless we somehow reverse the vanishing of the middle class.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [IT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have a friend that is considerably younger than me, who is in great shape. He’s around 30 and I’m 41. He runs and bought a Peloton. He proudly wears his Peloton tee to the gym. One day I asked him if he ever considered triathlon. It was like I was speaking another language. The idea had never remotely entered his mind space. He had a glossed over look just at a mention. I thought WTF...I realized later that the younger generation 35 and under has very little to no interest in triathlon.

IT wrote:
FlashBazbo wrote:
I think both of the observations are correct.

The aging of the "participation generation" seems to be hurting the younger age groups in all participation sports -- even the reasonably priced races.

And silly-high entry fees naturally also skew the demographics of the entry list -- while making IM into a one-and-done bucket list event.

IM needs to take a lesson from golf. With an aging and dying demographic, golf participation has been falling for years. Hundreds of golf courses have gone out of business. A similar wave has begun in triathlon. It's time for the powers at the top of the sport to take measures to turn it around.

Agree, yet wonder if triathlon is still "cool". It used to be a cool / bucket list / bragging rights kind of thing to do. That doesn't seem to be as prevalent as it once was across age groups. There could also be some resentment if you are way healthier than your peer group these days.

Sports these days need to be aware of what has been mentioned - video games - and reinvent themselves virtually. I think we have a better chance getting someone hooked on Zwift than riding on the road. Hopefully the virtual reality experience creates a desire to actually do it outdoors. Or I'm being too optimistic about that happening...
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ironman Cork 2020, 615 Euro (basically $700) after the admin fees.
You may or may not get to swim again for that money.
Oh and to be shuuure, Ireland is fecken expensive to visit.

It's becoming even more of a rich man's game. Or as others say a 1-and-through.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
With the proliferation or races, finishing an Ironman doesn't have the same cache it used to. Furthermore, the fact that half or more the people who actually are doing it are old enough to be grandparents has demystified the accomplishment for younger folks. And while the older generation is so fixated on IM's and HIM's, short course racing, which would be more accessible to somebody still in the family formation and career building stage of their life, is struggling to stay afloat.

"They're made of latex, not nitroglycerin"
Last edited by: gary p: Jul 8, 19 16:37
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [jhammond] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jhammond wrote:
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol


Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!

That's been the case for at least 20 years. Hard to blame it for the changing demographic.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ericMPro] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericMPro wrote:
I have been in the biggest AG at every IM I've ever done since 2007.

Poon wrote:
I was looking at the IMLP start list. It’s not news that the M45-49 AG surpassed the M40-44 AG a couple years ago in size. This was the first time I noticed M50-54 surpassing M40-44 in size. I’m sure it has happened in other races, but this seems notable. Three years ago, the early 40s men were the most crowded AG. Now, as those guys have gotten older, there haven’t been a lot of new entrants to the sport behind them.

Also notable that for slot allocation, we could see races where you need to be top 3 in M40-44 to qualify. A 50 yo could grab what would have once been the fourth slot.

Me too. I’ve always been in the largest AG. M35-39, M40-44, M45-49, and next year I move to 50-54.

Favorite Gear: Dimond | Cadex | Desoto Sport | Hoka One One
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [jhammond] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jhammond wrote:
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol

Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!

The hotel issue has always been an issue. It's not new, and thus it is not a valid reason behind the aging demographic.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [HuffNPuff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
HuffNPuff wrote:
jhammond wrote:
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol


Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!


The hotel issue has always been an issue. It's not new, and thus it is not a valid reason behind the aging demographic.

I think the real problem is you cannot do a local club sprint tri for $20 or a local Olympic tri for $50 anymore. When you could do that, there were plenty of athletes out of college or building your families who could do tris. You need an affordable feeder system to attract young people. The price of a club entry has to be in the range of multiple drinks at the bar. Once you are talking entry fees that are somewhere in between a monthly cell phone bill ( a must have) and a car payment (optional, but more likely to need that), then its hard to get young people to allocate money to this sport, which then means you have no new blood.

I would be interested in slowman's demographics around here on ST. I doubt it is much different. A bunch of middle age upper income white guys posting and spending on this sport (oh, and a few token none white guys, but we fall into the same disposable income range).
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [gary p] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gary p wrote:
With the proliferation or races, finishing an Ironman doesn't have the same cache it used to. Furthermore, the fact that half or more the people who actually are doing it are old enough to be grandparents has demystified the accomplishment for younger folks. And while the older generation is so fixated on IM's and HIM's, short course racing, which would be more accessible to somebody still in the family formation and career building stage of their life, is struggling to stay afloat.

I think you nailed it....the future looks dull....
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [The GMAN] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I remember in the 90s the 30-34 men’s group was by far the largest age group, I recall then looking forward to getting into the 40-44 age group to have a smaller number of competitors, I guess many of us kept doing it(?)
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ericMPro] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericMPro wrote:
I have been in the biggest AG at every IM I've ever done since 2007.

I think we're pretty much the same age (45). We are 'peak triathlon'.

I think there need to be more high profile short events, to get people into the sport more gradually, without the physical & financial pain. Maybe Ironman could make more of the 5150 distance....(but then you really have to be honest with swim training!). Either way, those of us who started out in the 80s/90s didn't do Tri because it was the popular thing to do! It's just a shame a lot of the smaller/shorter quirky races are dying-off.

29 years and counting
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
HuffNPuff wrote:
jhammond wrote:
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol


Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!


The hotel issue has always been an issue. It's not new, and thus it is not a valid reason behind the aging demographic.


I think the real problem is you cannot do a local club sprint tri for $20 or a local Olympic tri for $50 anymore. When you could do that, there were plenty of athletes out of college or building your families who could do tris. You need an affordable feeder system to attract young people. The price of a club entry has to be in the range of multiple drinks at the bar. Once you are talking entry fees that are somewhere in between a monthly cell phone bill ( a must have) and a car payment (optional, but more likely to need that), then its hard to get young people to allocate money to this sport, which then means you have no new blood.

I would be interested in slowman's demographics around here on ST. I doubt it is much different. A bunch of middle age upper income white guys posting and spending on this sport (oh, and a few token none white guys, but we fall into the same disposable income range).

A few things:

1.) A club can't put on a sprint for $20 and have it be insured as a club activity, have a permit to use the beach, and pay the mandatory police officers the minimum of four hours that is required. There are very few places where you can still do that, unfortunately. And if you decide to go rogue with it without permits...heaven help you.

2.) Same deal for the Olympic. Our half marathon starts at $40 and ranges up to $75. Our fixed costs grow more expensive every year but registration fees don't adequately keep pace, so our net winds up coming down each year since roughly 2015.

3.) In terms of the demographics, I can tell you that ST skews younger and more female than you or anybody else gives us credit for.

----------------------------------
Editor-in-Chief, Slowtwitch.com | Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think its a generational thing. Gen-X are the sports nuts and they are getting older. The younger generations are not as sports crazy. You can see it in almost all sports. Viewership, participation, ticket sales, are all down with the younger generation.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [rrheisler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Looking around at Steelhead last weekend it felt like there were more millennials in the crowd. Gave me some hope that another generation is finding the sport. Checking results, 30-34 was the largest age group and both the 40s groups were larger than 50-54. I'm sure 1/2s skew a bit younger but it didn't feel like just a bunch of us old guys.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Thom] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So what's interesting is that both Millenials and Gen Y both really value time spent outdoors and the activities associated with them. Generally speaking, though, Millenials are more likely to value individual activity (like kayaking or hiking) than a competitive one. But Gen Y is right there -- it's in their Top 5 for lifestyle requirements -- just need to capture them.

----------------------------------
Editor-in-Chief, Slowtwitch.com | Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Scottxs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Scottxs wrote:
I think its a generational thing. Gen-X are the sports nuts and they are getting older. The younger generations are not as sports crazy. You can see it in almost all sports. Viewership, participation, ticket sales, are all down with the younger generation.

As a fellow Gen-Xer I agree with this and most of the other posts as well. Very interesting!

The world is a very different place today compared to when us Gen-Xers were getting into our sports (late 1980s, 1990s). As a young competitive cyclist, I don't remember being worried about global warming, climate change, mass extinctions of animals, global food and water shortages, and other current global problems (just to name a few). With social media today there's much more awareness of how badly things are in the world. It feels like younger people are more conscious and getting more involved in trying to solve many current problems. At least more so than my generation and the baby boomers.

I love the Ironman and I admit that I'm hooked. But let's face it - IM is the most selfish sport on the planet in regards to time and money spent. I do feel torn sometimes. Should I re-allocate my time and resources towards a less selfish cause like helping the homeless, volunteering for a youth group, starting an animal sanctuary, etc? Perhaps more millennials are trying prioritize their lives in a way to do more good in the world? Maybe I'm way off base?

I also agree that cost is another big factor for younger folks.

Death is easy....peaceful. Life is harder.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70Trigirl wrote:
IM is the most selfish sport on the planet in regards to time and money spent.

What about sailing, mountaineering, motorsports to name but 3; then there are the parents who work away from their kids by choice (I see that a lot). Ironman isn't the only expensive self-consumed activity out there!

29 years and counting
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Jorgan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jorgan wrote:
70Trigirl wrote:
IM is the most selfish sport on the planet in regards to time and money spent.


What about sailing, mountaineering, motorsports to name but 3; then there are the parents who work away from their kids by choice (I see that a lot). Ironman isn't the only expensive self-consumed activity out there!

I'll admit I know close to nothing about the sports you mentioned. I wonder if any of them have seen a decrease in interest over the years like triathlon (and some people mentioned a decline in golf too).

Death is easy....peaceful. Life is harder.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70Trigirl wrote:
Scottxs wrote:
I think its a generational thing. Gen-X are the sports nuts and they are getting older. The younger generations are not as sports crazy. You can see it in almost all sports. Viewership, participation, ticket sales, are all down with the younger generation.


As a fellow Gen-Xer I agree with this and most of the other posts as well. Very interesting!

The world is a very different place today compared to when us Gen-Xers were getting into our sports (late 1980s, 1990s). As a young competitive cyclist, I don't remember being worried about global warming, climate change, mass extinctions of animals, global food and water shortages, and other current global problems (just to name a few). With social media today there's much more awareness of how badly things are in the world. It feels like younger people are more conscious and getting more involved in trying to solve many current problems. At least more so than my generation and the baby boomers.

I love the Ironman and I admit that I'm hooked. But let's face it - IM is the most selfish sport on the planet in regards to time and money spent. I do feel torn sometimes. Should I re-allocate my time and resources towards a less selfish cause like helping the homeless, volunteering for a youth group, starting an animal sanctuary, etc? Perhaps more millennials are trying prioritize their lives in a way to do more good in the world? Maybe I'm way off base?

I also agree that cost is another big factor for younger folks.


So when I see young people in the university gym where I work out staring at their phones instead of getting their weight session done in half the time, it's because they are reading about how to solve the current global problems? Maybe I shouldn't interrupt to ask if I can work in with him or her on the machine. :) I seriously doubt that fewer millennials are doing triathlon because they are too busy trying to solve the world's problems. I don't believe that social media has led to a more educated and aware populace than we were young. I do agree that they have other interests and tri is more expensive now than it was when I was in my 20s in the '80s. I did tris for more than a decade before I could afford to do my first IM.
Last edited by: Mark Lemmon: Jul 9, 19 8:03
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Mark Lemmon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mark Lemmon wrote:

So when I see young people in the university gym where I work out staring at their phones instead of getting their weight session done in half the time, it's because they are reading about how to solve the current global problems? Maybe I shouldn't interrupt to ask if I can work in with him or her on the machine. :) I seriously doubt that fewer millennials are doing triathlon because they are too busy trying to solve the world's problems. I don't believe that social media has led to a more educated and aware populace than we were young. I do agree that they have other interests and tri is more expensive now than it was when I was in my 20s in the '80s. I did tris for more than a decade before I could afford to do my first IM.

We are in big trouble if you are 100% correct :-)

Death is easy....peaceful. Life is harder.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As others have said, this is a problem across most sports.
I've been involved in orienteering since 2001 and the biggest male age class then was 40-45, now it's often 55-60 or 60-65. This is most obvious at large/major multi day events. Smaller local events are more variable depending on the location, but the middle ground of 25-45 is usually thin on numbers everywhere.

Orienteering isn't an expensive sport when it come to kit but the travel costs are often significant. Many people will need to drive for a couple of hours or more to find an event with a decent amount of competition. Entry fees for a good event will be ÂŁ15-25, but there is constant complaint that the fees are getting too high.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I personally think you're wrong about the 35 and under crowd not being interested in triathlon. There's an entire national championship geared towards the collegiate population..and it's a big deal in the collegiate tri world. A lot of those athletes go on to continue competing in triathlon, and some of them at the higher levels of competition. Heck, Taylor Spivey won the DL race at collegiate nats back in 2014 and Ben Kanute won both the DL and the Oly in 2013..they're both still competing. Not to mention there's the whole youth/junior elite series. The interest in triathlon is there, and those younger athletes are likely the future of the sport. However, they're mostly focused on short course Sprint/Oly racing, with the occasional half IM thrown in for fun. Can you blame them? If you want to pull out the whole "millennials have shorter attention spans, they want instant gratification and they want it now" argument, it makes sense. Long course has no allure to them, they don't want to be on the bike for 112 miles and then have to run a marathon afterwards, they want to be able to get their racing done before noon so they have the rest of their day to enjoy.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70Trigirl wrote:


We are in big trouble if you are 100% correct :-)


I certainly think there are plenty of young people concerned about those issues. I just don't think that focus is having an effect on their desire/ability to do a tri or two each summer. Triathlon is certainly a sport that celebrates the beauty of our world and the need to keep it healthy.
Last edited by: Mark Lemmon: Jul 9, 19 9:23
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [FlashBazbo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think this thread is starting to over-think this issue. This is not a class warfare issue. And it's not because there are more problems in the world today than there were in the past. (That's just not true. Remember no nukes? The impending ice age? The farm crisis? World hunger?)

The issue is very simple. Two components:

First, habits and priorities change from one generation to the next. It's about priorities. The Millennial generation spends less on participation sports than the previous generations, but they spend exponentially more on their pets and on vacation travel. That's not a class warfare issue. It's just a change in priorities. Millennials, like Xers and Boomers, do what they want to do. And right now, their 2.7 dogs per household (and thousands in annual spending per dog) get higher priority than triathlon. Most Boomers couldn't conceive of spending thousands for surgery for a dog. Twenty years ago, dogs were more "disposable." But most Millennials can't conceive of NOT spending thousands if that's what it takes to keep shelter dog #5 alive and healthy. Today, triathlon isn't competing with tennis. It's competing with house pets. It's about priorities. (And . . . let's be honest . . . for Boomers, obesity held a stigma. We might have been obese, but we were ashamed of it. For Millennials, for better or worse, obesity has lost its stigma. It's not as important socially to be physically fit anymore. It's a bigger stigma if our dog is obese!)

Second, the cost of triathlon has escalated many times faster than the rate of inflation. (As has the cost of bike racing, gravel racing, marathons, 5k's.) It's not unusual for entriy fees to be 8x to 10x what they were ten years ago. Admittedly, the costs of an event are higher -- which means the prices have to be higher. And when you raise prices, you get less demand. That leaves you with racers who are more committed than the average citizen -- but a lot fewer of them. "Empty nesters" aren't spending on the kids anymore -- and, for the most part, they haven't bought into the wealthy shelter dog idea yet -- so they can afford the higher fees. But for those who are considering the sport for the first time? The higher fees are a serious barrier to entry. The newbie is thinking, "What else could I do with that $200, $600, $800, plus travel expenses?"

Last edited by: FlashBazbo: Jul 9, 19 9:54
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
   I reckon it is because Ironman got too bloody serious and very few people are cutting loose and having fun.Back in the day we all used to party hard during training and even harder afterwards.It was all kinds of fun.Races were sponsored by beer companies and free booze was on the tables at BOTH the carbo parties as well as the awards.Athletes,both age group and pro sleeping around and causing all kinds of havoc at race after parties,it was awesome!!
.
Now you have coaches making you live like bloody Monks,pretending that everyone is elite and that we should all train like it is the fucking Olympics. ( actually have a quote from an Olympian about that ). The Underpant Run is off limits because that 1k jog might ruin your entire years preparation and bugger me I have even seen little cards at a mates party which listed the bloody calories count of each dish served on the buffet.
.
In short Ironman athletes tend to take themselves way too seriously and where the hell is the fun in that for young people.The obstacle course races,Crossfit and hell even Park Runs have taken over.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [FlashBazbo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
M33 here, started when I was M28 in the sport, about to drop out of the sport pretty soon...so I feel qualified to comment - these are my top-10 BROAD generalizations as I've seen it

1) Sport is really good for when you're either (1) single or (2) deeply involved in a relationship with established parenting routines. When you're actively dating / starting out / etc. It can be consuming. Hence why maybe 28-35ers are focused on family planning and cannot / will not allocate 8-15+ hours a week to triathlon. If you have an 8 and 12 year old who spends 2 hours a day at soccer, you probably can be efficient an workout alongside them. An 8 month old is still trying to breathe right.
2) The younger AG <25 is focused on getting careers in order, finding new social circles - and probably not willing to spend $1,000 for an IM weekend (I was not)
3) Sunday races suck, and Saturday bike check-in is a joke. Nobody wants to spend the weekend bothering yourself and your family with proper hydration, nutition, etc. and rest when you're potentially visiting a new place. All to get your "nutrition" locked in for a 23rd OA place or something like that. Then its Sunday at 11am and its time to go home, and go to work. We need more Saturday morning races (where you check in saturday). This is why I only do Saturday races with packet pick up the morning of the race.
4) Running is cool again. Its very cool. Trail running is all the rage. And you can run 7 hours a week and get very good. Oh, and you can workout once a day (or maybe just 8-10x a week). Triathlon can't compete with that. Want to stay fit, feel like an athlete and have a life? Run.
5) Working out twice a day every day is really draining and selfish. Younger generations like to socialize a bit more. Balance perhaps? Grind out a 1 hour workout in the morning and have the day free.
6) People are freaking out about biking on public roads. I see it more and more than even 6 years ago. And before you try, the trainer is uber boring and not a substitute to a 6am sunrise bike ride.
7) Younger folks can afford triathlon, but they prefer to travel. Where you've been is the Happy Hour brag vs. what you've done. Most <40s are thinking about the next weekend trip to Europe, not planning their 23 hour training weekend.
8) Drinking is really accessible and "trendy". Wine, micro brews, etc. Not a healthy hobby (or something I advocate), but it creates a lot more distractions (Hey Teddy, wanna go check out "Local Brewery XYZ", vs. "Hey Teddy, how about we smash some FTP intervals for 45 min?") The former happens more.
9) Young people either (1) really get into tris and kick ass or (2) are one and dones. You older folks love to grind out in the sport and be slow as F. I don't see that trend with 30 year olds as they do not appreciate just being there (and hence why old AGs grind it out).
10) Only had 9.

Sport won't die and when you're at the next IM branded race you'll feel like its the center of the world with 2,500 people there. So who cares? Its still fun (if you're into it, and probably old).
Last edited by: triczyk: Jul 9, 19 10:08
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I did my first IM at 29, am 33 now. I am not "HEY LOOK IM DOING AN IRONMAN" guy, but some of my co workers know. Those over 50 "wow that is awesome such dedication" ETC, they often ask how my training is going, how far am I up to running ETC. Those that are my age.... "I would never do that" "that has to take up so much time" Again, I don't do this for the approval of others, but there is for sure a difference of what peoples opinions are on the sport.
I also do think that people have got more serious and that has likely taken the fun out of it for many. (I am guilty of this myself) Used to be (like only 10 years ago) you would go to a group ride, and you would smash it, and everyone would come back gassed and drink a coffee or a beer. Now everyone has a power meter and it trying to end a ride with a 72% IF or a TSS of X, or stay in Zone Y. Those things are are fine, but have to balance with the other side as well.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've always wondered why WTC doesnt have 5Ks, newbie sprints and/or Aquabikes, Otillo type runs all in the same weekend as HIM or fulls. Those signing up for the smaller events would likely be attracted to watching a half or a full IM before the weekend was over. It would expose them to it, right there and then. And hopefully inspire them to do a bigger event next time it comes around. Kid fun runs are great, no doubt, BUT they can't sign up for another 10 to 15 years. Bring back the weekend multisport festival! Party! Party! Party!
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Yeti racer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeti racer wrote:
I've always wondered why WTC doesnt have 5Ks, newbie sprints and/or Aquabikes, Otillo type runs all in the same weekend as HIM or fulls. Those signing up for the smaller events would likely be attracted to watching a half or a full IM before the weekend was over. It would expose them to it, right there and then. And hopefully inspire them to do a bigger event next time it comes around. Kid fun runs are great, no doubt, BUT they can't sign up for another 10 to 15 years. Bring back the weekend multisport festival! Party! Party! Party!

.
WTC owns two multisport festivals within 30mins drive from my base in Australia.Here is the most famous one and it is an epic weekend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWOneNE--Hs

Ironman Cairns has a multisport festival as well during Ironman week and the many bars along the run course in town are packed full of spectators and 70.3 finishers all day on race day.
Last edited by: ThailandUltras: Jul 9, 19 11:09
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [rrheisler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rrheisler wrote:
devashish_paul wrote:
HuffNPuff wrote:
jhammond wrote:
indianacyclist wrote:
The amount of people willing to pay $800+ for a race entry is aging...

Those 40yr olds still have kids to put through college and 401(k)s to fund lol


Not to mention all of the incidental expenses of racing an IM. For example, most IMs don't allow packet pickup the day before. The extra hotel days (2?) adds enormous cost onto an already expensive trip!


The hotel issue has always been an issue. It's not new, and thus it is not a valid reason behind the aging demographic.


I think the real problem is you cannot do a local club sprint tri for $20 or a local Olympic tri for $50 anymore. When you could do that, there were plenty of athletes out of college or building your families who could do tris. You need an affordable feeder system to attract young people. The price of a club entry has to be in the range of multiple drinks at the bar. Once you are talking entry fees that are somewhere in between a monthly cell phone bill ( a must have) and a car payment (optional, but more likely to need that), then its hard to get young people to allocate money to this sport, which then means you have no new blood.

I would be interested in slowman's demographics around here on ST. I doubt it is much different. A bunch of middle age upper income white guys posting and spending on this sport (oh, and a few token none white guys, but we fall into the same disposable income range).


A few things:

1.) A club can't put on a sprint for $20 and have it be insured as a club activity, have a permit to use the beach, and pay the mandatory police officers the minimum of four hours that is required. There are very few places where you can still do that, unfortunately. And if you decide to go rogue with it without permits...heaven help you.

2.) Same deal for the Olympic. Our half marathon starts at $40 and ranges up to $75. Our fixed costs grow more expensive every year but registration fees don't adequately keep pace, so our net winds up coming down each year since roughly 2015.

3.) In terms of the demographics, I can tell you that ST skews younger and more female than you or anybody else gives us credit for.

I think this depends on where we live. We all don't live in the USA. Where I live (Ottawa Canada), we have the local bike club putting on a weekly 15km TT that is dirt cheap. If you can put on a 15K TT you can put on a TT sprint tri that is a 500m swim, whatever distance run to the spot on the road where the TT would start and then do a 15K bike. Run the sprint in TT mode. The actual location where the bike TT happens you can have a swim 500m in the Ottawa river, finish, have a short 3km run and do the bike TT. I have a location in mind near where I live where this could be done from a pool swim (also TT mode)...swim--->run to bike -> bike TT. You need a favourable city and where you can do out and back or all right turns.

My friend who is a 12x IM finisher puts on a sprint tri in her community for $60 just outside of Ottawa in Perth Ontario. 1K pool swim, 30K bike, 7 km run. Its been going on for 8 years.

At least in Canada, it is doable. But you need 20 somethings putting on races. I was a race director in my 20's and that's the way the sport will grow. You need young people stepping up and organizing the sport, not just old people.

Pretty well my cohort who have generally beeen the largest age group, is also the same cohort who organized races for the last 3 decades and continues to. If its just us doing the organizing then we cater to our peers. Andrew Messick in is my age group...the list goes on and on.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My wife and I are "millenials," put on races, race a ton (hell I'm pretty sure I'll get a bronze frequent buyer program cap this year), etc. I'm just telling you -- the fixed costs are rising and frequently a result of the permitting process. I'm currently stuck in hell trying to get the state DOT to finish signing off on our half marathon -- we're on our third new person in as many years handling our event permit.

----------------------------------
Editor-in-Chief, Slowtwitch.com | Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Poon] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yep... following the demographic that races these events.
It might shift later down the road as youth participation seems to be on the rise and it is getting close to a NCAA sport for women.

But, I think the rat is going through the IM snake and unfortunately I'm stuck in the middle of it!!!!!

Ryan
http://www.SetThePaceTriathlon.com
http://www.TriathlonTrainingDaddy.com
I got plans - https://www.trainingpeaks.com/...dotcom#trainingplans
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
M33 here, started when I was M28 in the sport, about to drop out of the sport pretty soon...so I feel qualified to comment - these are my top-10 BROAD generalizations as I've seen it

1) Sport is really good for when you're either (1) single or (2) deeply involved in a relationship with established parenting routines. When you're actively dating / starting out / etc. It can be consuming. Hence why maybe 28-35ers are focused on family planning and cannot / will not allocate 8-15+ hours a week to triathlon. If you have an 8 and 12 year old who spends 2 hours a day at soccer, you probably can be efficient an workout alongside them. An 8 month old is still trying to breathe right.
2) The younger AG <25 is focused on getting careers in order, finding new social circles - and probably not willing to spend $1,000 for an IM weekend (I was not)
3) Sunday races suck, and Saturday bike check-in is a joke. Nobody wants to spend the weekend bothering yourself and your family with proper hydration, nutition, etc. and rest when you're potentially visiting a new place. All to get your "nutrition" locked in for a 23rd OA place or something like that. Then its Sunday at 11am and its time to go home, and go to work. We need more Saturday morning races (where you check in saturday). This is why I only do Saturday races with packet pick up the morning of the race.
4) Running is cool again. Its very cool. Trail running is all the rage. And you can run 7 hours a week and get very good. Oh, and you can workout once a day (or maybe just 8-10x a week). Triathlon can't compete with that. Want to stay fit, feel like an athlete and have a life? Run.
5) Working out twice a day every day is really draining and selfish. Younger generations like to socialize a bit more. Balance perhaps? Grind out a 1 hour workout in the morning and have the day free.
6) People are freaking out about biking on public roads. I see it more and more than even 6 years ago. And before you try, the trainer is uber boring and not a substitute to a 6am sunrise bike ride.
7) Younger folks can afford triathlon, but they prefer to travel. Where you've been is the Happy Hour brag vs. what you've done. Most <40s are thinking about the next weekend trip to Europe, not planning their 23 hour training weekend.
8) Drinking is really accessible and "trendy". Wine, micro brews, etc. Not a healthy hobby (or something I advocate), but it creates a lot more distractions (Hey Teddy, wanna go check out "Local Brewery XYZ", vs. "Hey Teddy, how about we smash some FTP intervals for 45 min?") The former happens more.
9) Young people either (1) really get into tris and kick ass or (2) are one and dones. You older folks love to grind out in the sport and be slow as F. I don't see that trend with 30 year olds as they do not appreciate just being there (and hence why old AGs grind it out).
10) Only had 9.

Sport won't die and when you're at the next IM branded race you'll feel like its the center of the world with 2,500 people there. So who cares? Its still fun (if you're into it, and probably old).

I enjoyed your list, but a bunch of us old guys starting doing tris when we were in our early 20s and nearly everything on your list was also happening in the early '80s. I think one of the main differences between young adults now and 30 or 40 years ago was growing up riding a bicycle for transportation. I think there are a lot less kids who do that now which probably affects the affection for tris. I did my first couple of seasons of tris on the road bike I had as a teenager. I didn't feel weird showing up at a tri with that bike. That is likely different now, as is the fact that there are a lot more cars on the roads than there were in the early days of tris.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [rrheisler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rrheisler wrote:
My wife and I are "millenials," put on races, race a ton (hell I'm pretty sure I'll get a bronze frequent buyer program cap this year), etc. I'm just telling you -- the fixed costs are rising and frequently a result of the permitting process. I'm currently stuck in hell trying to get the state DOT to finish signing off on our half marathon -- we're on our third new person in as many years handling our event permit.

But triathlons don't HAVE to be on a road. I think that is the kind of thinking that Paul was implying....but I don't want to speak for him....

Stephen J

I believe my local reality has been violated.
____________________________________________
Happiness = Results / (Expectations)^2
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70Trigirl wrote:
Scottxs wrote:
I think its a generational thing. Gen-X are the sports nuts and they are getting older. The younger generations are not as sports crazy. You can see it in almost all sports. Viewership, participation, ticket sales, are all down with the younger generation.


As a fellow Gen-Xer I agree with this and most of the other posts as well. Very interesting!

The world is a very different place today compared to when us Gen-Xers were getting into our sports (late 1980s, 1990s). As a young competitive cyclist, I don't remember being worried about global warming, climate change, mass extinctions of animals, global food and water shortages, and other current global problems (just to name a few). With social media today there's much more awareness of how badly things are in the world. It feels like younger people are more conscious and getting more involved in trying to solve many current problems. At least more so than my generation and the baby boomers.

I love the Ironman and I admit that I'm hooked. But let's face it - IM is the most selfish sport on the planet in regards to time and money spent. I do feel torn sometimes. Should I re-allocate my time and resources towards a less selfish cause like helping the homeless, volunteering for a youth group, starting an animal sanctuary, etc? Perhaps more millennials are trying prioritize their lives in a way to do more good in the world? Maybe I'm way off base?

I also agree that cost is another big factor for younger folks.

It's awful what's done to each generation. When I was young, we had nuclear bomb drills and a nuclear clock. The world was going to end due to overpopulation. Gasoline and food was supposed to be long gone by now. Y2K.

Maybe we need to bring back the "The sky is falling" story to kindergartners. Previous generations had world wars and a great depression. Noah needed an Ark. Major cities and nations have been leveled more than once in history.

It's a shame that people are not supposed to enjoy themselves while they are getting closer to death each day and the world is ending. The individuals, artists, musicians and athletes who enjoyed themselves while their worlds were ending are still remembered fondly today.

BTW aren't aliens or zombies going to get us before longer term problems get us?

I've taught elementary - high school. Elected to school board. Scoutmaster. Downtown development board. Coached, helped juvies and the homeless. People are hard to help.

Indoor Triathlete - I thought I was right, until I realized I was wrong.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ThailandUltras] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think you touched on an important distinction. Most of the observations on this thread are US-centric.

My wife is Welsh and about 10 years ago I talked my brother in law off the soccer pitch for a Saturday to do a sprint race with me (plus, I needed a ride. Left side driving just feels wrong to my US sensibilities).

When we got back from the race later that day my SIL asked him how it was and he said “like nothing I’ve ever done before” and many IMs later I’m not sure he’s ever gone back on a soccer pitch.

When I’m there I am sad to relate the state of tri here with tales of vanished races but at least in the U.K. it seems to be going from tri strength to strength.

It also helps that Britain has produced a long run of TdF winners and Olympic tri and track cycling champions.

Maybe being something of a celebrity obsessed culture we need another charismatic American TdF champion again to lift us out of the doldrums? No one on the horizon unfortunately but love or hate the person the dynamic engages people.

Purely anecdotal take but that’s the view from my perch.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [IT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As a 25 y/o, the gross over-generalizations of millennials kill me. Though it may be true that millennials are generally more aware and conscious of these issues, that doesn't make us all social justice warriors. Neither myself nor anyone in my social circle is as extreme as the pictures painted of us in this thread... I'm a competitive AG'er and show up to local races with a good showing of other competitive 25-29 year olds. I'm more inclined to support local races (sprint, Oly, Half) than shell out $500 for an IM branded 70.3 with an overcrowded bike course. But I can promise you that as one of the largest generations head count wise, we are far more diverse than the mainstream media portrays us to be...
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [spencer99w] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
spencer99w wrote:
As a 25 y/o, the gross over-generalizations of millennials kill me. Though it may be true that millennials are generally more aware and conscious of these issues, that doesn't make us all social justice warriors. Neither myself nor anyone in my social circle is as extreme as the pictures painted of us in this thread... I'm a competitive AG'er and show up to local races with a good showing of other competitive 25-29 year olds. I'm more inclined to support local races (sprint, Oly, Half) than shell out $500 for an IM branded 70.3 with an overcrowded bike course. But I can promise you that as one of the largest generations head count wise, we are far more diverse than the mainstream media portrays us to be...

So glad to hear that. That is encouraging because the media makes it sound as if everyone has bought into the doom. You are not anymore doomed than the rest of us lol

Carry on.

Indoor Triathlete - I thought I was right, until I realized I was wrong.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [IT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IT wrote:

It's awful what's done to each generation. When I was young, we had nuclear bomb drills and a nuclear clock. The world was going to end due to overpopulation. Gasoline and food was supposed to be long gone by now. Y2K.

And Documentaries like the one below don't help alleviate this worry. Humans do continue to press on no matter how much stress we cause the planet with our endless wars, consumption, overpopulation, environmental destruction, etc. Maybe the end is nearing for us sooner than we want to believe. I hope not. I still have many bucket list races :-)

10 Billion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV5xiRKw5f4



Death is easy....peaceful. Life is harder.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70Trigirl wrote:
IT wrote:


It's awful what's done to each generation. When I was young, we had nuclear bomb drills and a nuclear clock. The world was going to end due to overpopulation. Gasoline and food was supposed to be long gone by now. Y2K.


And Documentaries like the one below don't help alleviate this worry. Humans do continue to press on no matter how much stress we cause the planet with our endless wars, consumption, overpopulation, environmental destruction, etc. Maybe the end is nearing for us sooner than we want to believe. I hope not. I still have many bucket list races :-)

10 Billion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV5xiRKw5f4


One of the great things about sport is the impact it has on an individual and society. That participation in sport is declining and fear increasing is not desirable IMO. Scare tactics have been used for in the past to get people to do what they normally wouldn't do - like kill other people.

Would this be a utopian or dystopian society that a Hitler would try to sell in today's world?
  1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
  3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
  4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
  5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
  9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
  10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

It's honest of you to say what you're concerns are. I could see how some would take the concerns so seriously as to not want to participate in sports. Still don't think that is good, if that is what is happening.

Indoor Triathlete - I thought I was right, until I realized I was wrong.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
M33 here, started when I was M28 in the sport, about to drop out of the sport pretty soon...so I feel qualified to comment - these are my top-10 BROAD generalizations as I've seen it

1) Sport is really good for when you're either (1) single or (2) deeply involved in a relationship with established parenting routines. When you're actively dating / starting out / etc. It can be consuming. Hence why maybe 28-35ers are focused on family planning and cannot / will not allocate 8-15+ hours a week to triathlon. If you have an 8 and 12 year old who spends 2 hours a day at soccer, you probably can be efficient an workout alongside them. An 8 month old is still trying to breathe right.
2) The younger AG <25 is focused on getting careers in order, finding new social circles - and probably not willing to spend $1,000 for an IM weekend (I was not)
3) Sunday races suck, and Saturday bike check-in is a joke. Nobody wants to spend the weekend bothering yourself and your family with proper hydration, nutition, etc. and rest when you're potentially visiting a new place. All to get your "nutrition" locked in for a 23rd OA place or something like that. Then its Sunday at 11am and its time to go home, and go to work. We need more Saturday morning races (where you check in saturday). This is why I only do Saturday races with packet pick up the morning of the race.
4) Running is cool again. Its very cool. Trail running is all the rage. And you can run 7 hours a week and get very good. Oh, and you can workout once a day (or maybe just 8-10x a week). Triathlon can't compete with that. Want to stay fit, feel like an athlete and have a life? Run.
5) Working out twice a day every day is really draining and selfish. Younger generations like to socialize a bit more. Balance perhaps? Grind out a 1 hour workout in the morning and have the day free.
6) People are freaking out about biking on public roads. I see it more and more than even 6 years ago. And before you try, the trainer is uber boring and not a substitute to a 6am sunrise bike ride.
7) Younger folks can afford triathlon, but they prefer to travel. Where you've been is the Happy Hour brag vs. what you've done. Most <40s are thinking about the next weekend trip to Europe, not planning their 23 hour training weekend.
8) Drinking is really accessible and "trendy". Wine, micro brews, etc. Not a healthy hobby (or something I advocate), but it creates a lot more distractions (Hey Teddy, wanna go check out "Local Brewery XYZ", vs. "Hey Teddy, how about we smash some FTP intervals for 45 min?") The former happens more.
9) Young people either (1) really get into tris and kick ass or (2) are one and dones. You older folks love to grind out in the sport and be slow as F. I don't see that trend with 30 year olds as they do not appreciate just being there (and hence why old AGs grind it out).
10) Only had 9.

Sport won't die and when you're at the next IM branded race you'll feel like its the center of the world with 2,500 people there. So who cares? Its still fun (if you're into it, and probably old).

I've done several tris including two full IM Wisconsin races, and am in the dreaded aging demo just over 50 (how the hell did that happen).

My last IMWI, I spent around $800 entry, and multi-night stay in Madison (I think rates were jacked up on hotels). I enjoyed the actual race, but overall was kind of a pain and expensive. And I got a talking to about a ridiculous pre-race bike helmet situation.

Two weeks later I ran a 5k on Chicago Lakefront. I showed up late for that race and had to run for the signup. Got my bib fastened just as the gun went off. Set a PR and placed in my age group (no great shakes, it was a slower field that day, but I'll take it). Hour later I was sitting with wife and friends at a lakefront bar, drinking a margarita with fish tacos and enjoying the rest of the day. I looked at my wife and said something like "Remind me why I did IM?". I mean, for a $40 5K entrance fee (which by the way went to cancer research and not a race corporation), I got a placement medal not just participant, and was enjoying life with a margarita. :)

Sorry I am dogging IM. I enjoyed IM and met a lot of nice people along the way. I am still proud of accomplishing the mass start swim, something I had a lot of concern about, but actually ended up enjoying. (Sadly IMWI has gotten rid of the mass start swim.) Also I volunteered 4 times for IMWI (handed out water to bikers, finish line catcher, twice kayak swim helper). IM has it's good and bad points. I think for IM to encourage participation, they should lower costs and also cater more to the non "tri lifestyle" folks. The people who "race to train" are all-in already as customers, and generally get more out of IM than people like me who "train to race" and are not looking for the lifestyle aspect and something to fill a year of their time.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Indio22] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The spirit of your reply is spot on. Do something productive and then enjoy the day.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
The spirit of your reply is spot on. Do something productive and then enjoy the day.

This is exactly how I feel about 70.3. It's still a hard day. But 4.5-5 hours later and I'm hanging out with my family again and drinking a beer.

vs

"ok, wave to daddy as he gets on his bike. He'll be back in 5-6 hours!"
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
triczyk wrote:
The spirit of your reply is spot on. Do something productive and then enjoy the day.

This is exactly how I feel about 70.3. It's still a hard day. But 4.5-5 hours later and I'm hanging out with my family again and drinking a beer.

vs

"ok, wave to daddy as he gets on his bike. He'll be back in 5-6 hours!"

That’s fair - but did you do everything you wanted to on Saturday before?
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm not sure I understand your question
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question

I might be different but the 3-4 hours it take to check in your bike the day before is sorta a waste of a weekend in my opinion
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why is it taking you 3-4 hours to drop a bike off in transition?
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question

I guess the point is that the time commitment is much more than just race day. If it is not a local race you are having your family travel days before, attend checkin, bike drop, etc all in the day/s before the actual race. You are doing this while trying to maintain a strict diet. You are probably completely distracted, maybe grumpy, maybe on an emotional rollercoaster.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [TIT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
All those things could be applied to running as well...

If it's not local, you have to travel.
You could be managing your diet...and being grumpy.

There are many local tri races (at least around me) that can register morning of. Are reasonably cheap and fun. Yes, even half irons.

But I do understand what you're saying. A local 5k is of course going to be easier logistically than traveling to an Ironman. As well as training for one.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
Why is it taking you 3-4 hours to drop a bike off in transition?

It probably depends on the actual race. I've only sone one 70.3 so far but there was an hour car drive between T2/finish where I had to checkin and T1 where I had to drop my bike. When I got there, parking was extremely limited and there was a sea of people. It took up the whole of Saturday morning.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [TIT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sounds like PAcific Crest! haha.

I understand what you're saying. IM takes a crap ton of logistics. 70.3 (I would argue) takes less than half the logistics
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
All those things could be applied to running as well...

If it's not local, you have to travel.
You could be managing your diet...and being grumpy.

There are many local tri races (at least around me) that can register morning of. Are reasonably cheap and fun. Yes, even half irons.

But I do understand what you're saying. A local 5k is of course going to be easier logistically than traveling to an Ironman. As well as training for one.

Bolded is the real issue. Does someone really have a problem dedicating one weekend to a big race? Not likely. Ironman race day (& weekend) is magical and I love it. It's the months of weekends prior to race day that make me want to have no part of it going forward.

For a 70.3 and shorter I can do my normal weekday training that's part of my routine, and some shorter stuff on weekend mornings (if it works out), and still have a great race.

What I dislike about triathlon in particular, is that having to keep up with all 3 sports means that it's almost impossible to train an hour or less a day (1 session), and keep anywhere near good fitness. You can be an awesome runner on 1 hr a day.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sean H wrote:
Geek_fit wrote:
All those things could be applied to running as well...

If it's not local, you have to travel.
You could be managing your diet...and being grumpy.

There are many local tri races (at least around me) that can register morning of. Are reasonably cheap and fun. Yes, even half irons.

But I do understand what you're saying. A local 5k is of course going to be easier logistically than traveling to an Ironman. As well as training for one.


Bolded is the real issue. Does someone really have a problem dedicating one weekend to a big race? Not likely. Ironman race day (& weekend) is magical and I love it. It's the months of weekends prior to race day that make me want to have no part of it going forward.

For a 70.3 and shorter I can do my normal weekday training that's part of my routine, and some shorter stuff on weekend mornings (if it works out), and still have a great race.

What I dislike about triathlon in particular, is that having to keep up with all 3 sports means that it's almost impossible to train an hour or less a day (1 session), and keep anywhere near good fitness. You can be an awesome runner on 1 hr a day.

Yeah, that's basically what I said above. 70.3 is a pretty ideal distance. At least for me, I don't have to do much more than what I would normally do (I average about 7-8 hours a week) and still stay near the pointy end of competition.

For IM...7-8 hours basically puts me MOP. Probably wouldn't even be there if I wasn't a strong swimmer.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
Why is it taking you 3-4 hours to drop a bike off in transition?

It depends on the race. One IM we did had a split transition which was located far from everything else. From our AirB&B we had to walk almost 30 minutes to the train station through crowds of tourists. By the time we got off the train it was probably another hour (looking at maps, purchasing tickets, waiting for train, train ride). Then we had another 20-30 minute walk to transition. After that we had to walk back to the train, take the train and walk back to our accommodations, again fighting crowds of tourists. It was long and tedious and took a good portion of the day. But other races have been much easier where we only spent maybe an hour getting bikes to transition.

Death is easy....peaceful. Life is harder.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [70Trigirl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Right. There are always going to be outlier cases. I've done local running races that required a bus ride and waiting around for it to start. But that should hopefully be far from the norm for most races.

Again, I'm not saying a 5k takes the same day of effort as an IM. I just don't think 3-4 hours to check in your bike is the norm
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Geek_fit] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Geek_fit wrote:
All those things could be applied to running as well...

If it's not local, you have to travel.
You could be managing your diet...and being grumpy.

There are many local tri races (at least around me) that can register morning of. Are reasonably cheap and fun. Yes, even half irons.

But I do understand what you're saying. A local 5k is of course going to be easier logistically than traveling to an Ironman. As well as training for one.

Wow that’s great
I don’t know if races like that near me

But I do travel a lot

Where do you live?
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [MrTri123] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pacific Northwest
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [TIT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TIT wrote:
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question


I guess the point is that the time commitment is much more than just race day. If it is not a local race you are having your family travel days before, attend checkin, bike drop, etc all in the day/s before the actual race. You are doing this while trying to maintain a strict diet. You are probably completely distracted, maybe grumpy, maybe on an emotional rollercoaster.

  1. Why would an age grouper bother being on a strict diet....read from Greg Lemond's old book about cycling. Rule number one to being a good athlete is to be able to eat anything for loading up before an event and eat anything for recovering after event. Greg said something like this, "I have to eat in 23 different hotels in 23 days and race on 21 days and perform. I have to perform with what I get, or I lose the Tour de France"....how simple is that? All you age groupers need to take a page out of that
  2. Why are you distracted. Just focus on what is in front of you. If its your family, its your family...then ignore your bike. If it is your bike cause you're putting on new rubber, ignore your family. Its reasonably simple if you set the expectations. If you can't do it, then don't bring your family. They will be thankful to not come
  3. No reason to be grumpy. We're doing this for recreation and entertainment. No one cares about your results. Not even your family. Only you. No one is looking at the nth decimal place beside our names. Our families will throw away all those finisher medals in the trash the day after we die. No one has any use for our times nor medals....don't be grumpy!

Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
TIT wrote:
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question


I guess the point is that the time commitment is much more than just race day. If it is not a local race you are having your family travel days before, attend checkin, bike drop, etc all in the day/s before the actual race. You are doing this while trying to maintain a strict diet. You are probably completely distracted, maybe grumpy, maybe on an emotional rollercoaster.

  1. Why would an age grouper bother being on a strict diet....read from Greg Lemond's old book about cycling. Rule number one to being a good athlete is to be able to eat anything for loading up before an event and eat anything for recovering after event. Greg said something like this, "I have to eat in 23 different hotels in 23 days and race on 21 days and perform. I have to perform with what I get, or I lose the Tour de France"....how simple is that? All you age groupers need to take a page out of that
  2. Why are you distracted. Just focus on what is in front of you. If its your family, its your family...then ignore your bike. If it is your bike cause you're putting on new rubber, ignore your family. Its reasonably simple if you set the expectations. If you can't do it, then don't bring your family. They will be thankful to not come
  3. No reason to be grumpy. We're doing this for recreation and entertainment. No one cares about your results. Not even your family. Only you. No one is looking at the nth decimal place beside our names. Our families will throw away all those finisher medals in the trash the day after we die. No one has any use for our times nor medals....don't be grumpy!

Well it is easy to sit there and write something that makes it all sound so simple but the reality is that many athletes struggle with their emotions before and after a big event.

Leading up to my first 70.3 I was extremely distracted because the athletes guide made everything sound so precise. All of my previous oly/sprint races were just about showing up and checking in on the day. Then of course it was running over nutrition, pacing etc in my mind, doubting myself. I have my second 70.3 coming up in 2 months and I know I will be a lot less nervous and distracted.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
TIT wrote:
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question


I guess the point is that the time commitment is much more than just race day. If it is not a local race you are having your family travel days before, attend checkin, bike drop, etc all in the day/s before the actual race. You are doing this while trying to maintain a strict diet. You are probably completely distracted, maybe grumpy, maybe on an emotional rollercoaster.


  1. Why would an age grouper bother being on a strict diet....read from Greg Lemond's old book about cycling. Rule number one to being a good athlete is to be able to eat anything for loading up before an event and eat anything for recovering after event. Greg said something like this, "I have to eat in 23 different hotels in 23 days and race on 21 days and perform. I have to perform with what I get, or I lose the Tour de France"....how simple is that? All you age groupers need to take a page out of that
  2. Why are you distracted. Just focus on what is in front of you. If its your family, its your family...then ignore your bike. If it is your bike cause you're putting on new rubber, ignore your family. Its reasonably simple if you set the expectations. If you can't do it, then don't bring your family. They will be thankful to not come
  3. No reason to be grumpy. We're doing this for recreation and entertainment. No one cares about your results. Not even your family. Only you. No one is looking at the nth decimal place beside our names. Our families will throw away all those finisher medals in the trash the day after we die. No one has any use for our times nor medals....don't be grumpy!
.
So much of that "old school mentality" is lost on triathletes today Dev.Instead of just going out and enjoying smashing each other in training while riding up random mountain roads and laughing about it in the pub later,people are now training in their electronic bubble and then posting the numbers on social media.
.
For me it is a shame to see that people are more interested in staring at the numbers on their Garmins than the scenery passing by around them on training rides and runs.I started to notice the change in attitude in around 2003 and it has just magnified since then.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ThailandUltras] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sure that’s true to some extend. But I know plenty of triathletes who are more old school than not. Of course they also tend to crossover into gravel biking as well
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [TIT] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TIT wrote:
devashish_paul wrote:
TIT wrote:
Geek_fit wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question


I guess the point is that the time commitment is much more than just race day. If it is not a local race you are having your family travel days before, attend checkin, bike drop, etc all in the day/s before the actual race. You are doing this while trying to maintain a strict diet. You are probably completely distracted, maybe grumpy, maybe on an emotional rollercoaster.


  1. Why would an age grouper bother being on a strict diet....read from Greg Lemond's old book about cycling. Rule number one to being a good athlete is to be able to eat anything for loading up before an event and eat anything for recovering after event. Greg said something like this, "I have to eat in 23 different hotels in 23 days and race on 21 days and perform. I have to perform with what I get, or I lose the Tour de France"....how simple is that? All you age groupers need to take a page out of that
  2. Why are you distracted. Just focus on what is in front of you. If its your family, its your family...then ignore your bike. If it is your bike cause you're putting on new rubber, ignore your family. Its reasonably simple if you set the expectations. If you can't do it, then don't bring your family. They will be thankful to not come
  3. No reason to be grumpy. We're doing this for recreation and entertainment. No one cares about your results. Not even your family. Only you. No one is looking at the nth decimal place beside our names. Our families will throw away all those finisher medals in the trash the day after we die. No one has any use for our times nor medals....don't be grumpy!


Well it is easy to sit there and write something that makes it all sound so simple but the reality is that many athletes struggle with their emotions before and after a big event.

Leading up to my first 70.3 I was extremely distracted because the athletes guide made everything sound so precise. All of my previous oly/sprint races were just about showing up and checking in on the day. Then of course it was running over nutrition, pacing etc in my mind, doubting myself. I have my second 70.3 coming up in 2 months and I know I will be a lot less nervous and distracted.

Guys, its easy to write what I wrote because you guys are all wound up in a ball about your own insignificant performances and I say that because I have my stupid 31 IM finisher medals and Kona medals in a heap in the basement gathering dust that no one including myself cares about. I do care about my journey to those finish lines....race day, race weekend and the 363 days before with awesome friends and families.

Most of you are missing the point of this sport and Nick captured it so well...go smash your buddies on fun training days and talk smack about it in the bar. Really, at your funeral, its those buddies who are showing up and they won't give a rats ass about your race results. They won't remember your results. They will remember that amazing climb together up a mountain or that epic track workout or trail run or whatever. They will remember the races you did together, but they won't remember your time. They won't know what is beside your name on sportstats, or strava or garmin connect. I'm probably one of those oddball people who can remember the various PBs of my buddies and remind the rest of the world how awesome they were when they did those PB's. The Ultrathailand guy who just posted, he's a guy who has gone waaaaaay sub 10 at Ironman Canada and WON Ultraman Canada, so the guy knows high performance more than 99% of this forum

Sooooo, its easy to write and tell everyone to unwind, because it really is easy to unwind, if you let go about caring so much of the results that you can't smell the roses on the journey along the way and that includes race weekend. Its all part of the journey and fellow athletes and families are part of the journey.

Seriously guys, just listen to what Nick is saying. And take note of what I am saying....just treat the race like a workout but with a timing chip on. If you visualized the entire process every night for a month before you A event, when you get there, its just automatic. If you did not visualize, then you're having to spend too much brain power on the spot trying to figure it out.

Imagine a big presentation at work, a major academic exam, or a thesis defence. You don't just show up and try to figure it out on the spot. Anyone who is a high performer, is already mentally prepared and when they show up they are on autopilot and relaxed and just crank through things max relax. Be that person with your racing.
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ThailandUltras] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThailandUltras wrote:
Yeti racer wrote:
I've always wondered why WTC doesnt have 5Ks, newbie sprints and/or Aquabikes, Otillo type runs all in the same weekend as HIM or fulls. Those signing up for the smaller events would likely be attracted to watching a half or a full IM before the weekend was over. It would expose them to it, right there and then. And hopefully inspire them to do a bigger event next time it comes around. Kid fun runs are great, no doubt, BUT they can't sign up for another 10 to 15 years. Bring back the weekend multisport festival! Party! Party! Party!

.
WTC owns two multisport festivals within 30mins drive from my base in Australia.Here is the most famous one and it is an epic weekend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWOneNE--Hs

Ironman Cairns has a multisport festival as well during Ironman week and the many bars along the run course in town are packed full of spectators and 70.3 finishers all day on race day.

maybe I will make it down there someday. LOOKS FOOKIN' EPIC!!!
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [Yeti racer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeti racer wrote:
ThailandUltras wrote:
Yeti racer wrote:
I've always wondered why WTC doesnt have 5Ks, newbie sprints and/or Aquabikes, Otillo type runs all in the same weekend as HIM or fulls. Those signing up for the smaller events would likely be attracted to watching a half or a full IM before the weekend was over. It would expose them to it, right there and then. And hopefully inspire them to do a bigger event next time it comes around. Kid fun runs are great, no doubt, BUT they can't sign up for another 10 to 15 years. Bring back the weekend multisport festival! Party! Party! Party!

.
WTC owns two multisport festivals within 30mins drive from my base in Australia.Here is the most famous one and it is an epic weekend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWOneNE--Hs

Ironman Cairns has a multisport festival as well during Ironman week and the many bars along the run course in town are packed full of spectators and 70.3 finishers all day on race day.


maybe I will make it down there someday. LOOKS FOOKIN' EPIC!!!

..
I reckon it is worth the trip as the whole weekend is too much fun and Noosa isn't such a bad place to have to spent time. :-)

Ironman Cairns is definitely worth a look as well...
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:

Guys, its easy to write what I wrote because you guys are all wound up in a ball about your own insignificant performances and I say that because I have my stupid 31 IM finisher medals and Kona medals in a heap in the basement gathering dust that no one including myself cares about. I do care about my journey to those finish lines....race day, race weekend and the 363 days before with awesome friends and families.

Most of you are missing the point of this sport and Nick captured it so well...go smash your buddies on fun training days and talk smack about it in the bar. Really, at your funeral, its those buddies who are showing up and they won't give a rats ass about your race results. They won't remember your results. They will remember that amazing climb together up a mountain or that epic track workout or trail run or whatever. They will remember the races you did together, but they won't remember your time. They won't know what is beside your name on sportstats, or strava or garmin connect. I'm probably one of those oddball people who can remember the various PBs of my buddies and remind the rest of the world how awesome they were when they did those PB's. The Ultrathailand guy who just posted, he's a guy who has gone waaaaaay sub 10 at Ironman Canada and WON Ultraman Canada, so the guy knows high performance more than 99% of this forum

Sooooo, its easy to write and tell everyone to unwind, because it really is easy to unwind, if you let go about caring so much of the results that you can't smell the roses on the journey along the way and that includes race weekend. Its all part of the journey and fellow athletes and families are part of the journey.

Seriously guys, just listen to what Nick is saying. And take note of what I am saying....just treat the race like a workout but with a timing chip on. If you visualized the entire process every night for a month before you A event, when you get there, its just automatic. If you did not visualize, then you're having to spend too much brain power on the spot trying to figure it out.

Imagine a big presentation at work, a major academic exam, or a thesis defence. You don't just show up and try to figure it out on the spot. Anyone who is a high performer, is already mentally prepared and when they show up they are on autopilot and relaxed and just crank through things max relax. Be that person with your racing.
.
Thank's for the props Dev.

There are two things that have surprised me more than anything in this sport and they are,the fact that I actually won a couple of Ultramans and the other one is that you haven't cracked 10hrs.Lord knows you put in the work.

As you most likely know,after 33 years in triathlon and 34 of bike touring,I bought my first "tech gear" early this year and they were a Garmin watch to monitor my heart rate (due to medical issues) and a Garmin 1030 and 820 to use on the Indian Pacific Wheel Race in March. I turned them off at the end of May because on one of my last rides before heading back to Oz from Thailand I actually delayed a ride because the bloody battery was flat on my 820.As I sat there losing interest in going out at all,I though,"what the fuck am I doing,letting a bloody Garmin stop me from getting on my bike?" I was getting sucked into the void.

Yesterday I turned them back on but mainly to use as navigation aids as I explore the local village roads in the district here in Thailand.We shall see how long they last. :-)
Quote Reply
Re: Aging of the IM field [ericMPro] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
When I raced IMLP in 2006 m35-39 was the largest age group....I was in that group then and now that I am 53 I am sure that a lot if us are still at it.....which along with disposable income likely is a critical reason.
Quote Reply