Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age
Quote | Reply
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.

Ironman Lake Placid 2021| 70.3 Worlds St. George 2021
Last edited by: MatthewLigman: Jun 5, 20 8:40
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.

This is for future you, but keeping your weight in check in the winter/off season is one of my strategies. I've had similar swings in weight in the off season and came to realize that it's easier to maintain a good weight than it is to lose unwanted weight. I'm 43 now, and that last few years I've made a few changes. One of them that works for me is to set myself up with smaller portions for the meals that I can. For example, I do a protein shake for breakfast after my morning workout vs eating cereal where I can just keep refilling the bowl. Once the shake is gone I'm done. Same for lunch, I only bring to work what I want myself to eat for lunch and snacks. My final strategy is running more. I've almost doubled my bike volume in the past 6 months with very little effect on my weight, but as I've increased running ever-so-slightly, the weight has melted off. Good luck!

"One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time."
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How much ice cream do you eat?
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The biggest difference for me to lose or maintain weight while training is the timing of eating-when it comes to longer training sessions that go with 70.3 and IM training. I have a better fueling plan after hard or long workouts today at 47 than I did at 35 (and younger). Just the simple idea of replacing half of the calories that I "burned" within an hour of my longer sessions and then 2-4 hours after that replace the other half has helped me tremendously. It was literally a "pro" tip I got from a triathlete.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My weight bounced all over the place last year. I got to a low of 145lbs (goal weight) and this offseason went close to 170lbs. It was brutal. I tried everything to get it off with no luck and stuck at 160lbs.

I'm now at 149lbs on a plant based diet. Lots of coffee (2 cups) and no limit on whole foods like oats, bananas, apples, kale, carrots, tomatoes, corn, chickpeas, black beans, edamame, lima beans, quinoa, wild rice, couscous, almond milk, peanut butter powder, etc.

I eat meat once or twice a week. It also has helped keep my blood sugar from spiking. No more cravings and binging on garbage.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Lots of coffee (two cups) ...



You and I have very different definitions of "lots of coffee".

The day doesn't start until #4.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
At age 35 I weighed 150. At age 45, I weight 210. The gain was gradual over that decade. But, at that point, I said "F*** that!".

I cut alcohol back to weekends only, cutout almost all sweets, dropped calories consumed down below total expended... And lost the 60 pounds over ~9 months.

Today at 51 years old, I weigh 145...4 lbs more than when I turned 19. Granted it took open heart surgery, two weeks in the hospital and some nasty drugs to loose those last 5 lbs.
:o). Not really the best approach.

But today, I eat a shit ton less food than when I was 19, 25, 35,or 45. My body just doesn't burn it. At 30 I was consuming 5000 cal per day. Today it's half that. So, you have to learn how much to eat.

I don't replenish after workouts much anymore... Except maybe the long ride....and occasionally the long run. As mentioned above, if I do... I replace about 1/3rd or so. Not the whole balance.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Lots of coffee (2 cups)

You lost all credibility with that statement.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well, first off, I don't think aging really kicks in until around 40. At least, I did not notice anything odd until then and was as fast as ever when I was 37-39. I had a job transition where i was time-limited and at 42 or 43 I jumped back in and could not even touch my previous training levels.
Now, I don't know how people that train gain weight. Maybe it is because I never stop training and so I am always burning calories and thus never gain weight. That said, for the first time in the last twenty years, I gained about 10 pounds in December in large part because the weather was horrible (almost no cycling), I got sick (very little running) and because my daughter and I bake (and eat) goodies together every Christmas. So I ate the same amount but trained very little.
It took me three months to get back to normal and that meant I had to start doing 10-15 hours a week again upon which point my body just finds its equilibrium and I'm good.
Consistency in training and eating is the key to keeping things steady. I know exactly how much I train from my logbook, but eating is just eating. I would not even know why I gained weight last winter if it were not for the specific season where I know I eat a lot of baked sweats.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [logella] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
logella wrote:
Quote:
Lots of coffee (2 cups)

You lost all credibility with that statement.

Good to know I'm not overconsuming. Lol.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [cdw] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cdw wrote:
Well, first off, I don't think aging really kicks in until around 40. At least, I did not notice anything odd until then and was as fast as ever when I was 37-39. I had a job transition where i was time-limited and at 42 or 43 I jumped back in and could not even touch my previous training levels.
Now, I don't know how people that train gain weight. Maybe it is because I never stop training and so I am always burning calories and thus never gain weight. That said, for the first time in the last twenty years, I gained about 10 pounds in December in large part because the weather was horrible (almost no cycling), I got sick (very little running) and because my daughter and I bake (and eat) goodies together every Christmas. So I ate the same amount but trained very little.
It took me three months to get back to normal and that meant I had to start doing 10-15 hours a week again upon which point my body just finds its equilibrium and I'm good.
Consistency in training and eating is the key to keeping things steady. I know exactly how much I train from my logbook, but eating is just eating. I would not even know why I gained weight last winter if it were not for the specific season where I know I eat a lot of baked sweats.

Diet is everything. The sweets are what caused your gain. You were almost certainly taking in a lot more calories than normal. Regular training helps, but as they say you can't out train a bad diet.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm 45, LD triathlete. Use to eat a lot. Train always a lot, +16h/week year average, even during locked down. Close to 172lb (6'0) all year round. At the beginning of the locked down I started with the intermittent fasting just to stay focus on something new. Because of my family dynamic, I went for 19:5 for 6 days, then a 24h fasting the 7th (no training day). Did it for 10 weeks straight, then eased a little. Now I'm thinner than ever, and going hard on SBR.
In the 5h window I would eat twice, the first meal as much as I could put in (110% full), mostly complex carbs (mix of oat&cereal, fruit), dairy and +85% pure chocolate. The second and last with a big % of either meat, eggs, or fish, with potatoes/rice/bread, and greens (90% full). Repeat next day. It worked for me.

STRAVA INSTAGRAM
Last edited by: Dr. Triax: Jun 7, 20 6:55
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've eaten less.

After dinner (around 5 p.m.), I don't eat again until 9-10ish a.m. unless I'm doing a harder/longer ride.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Dr. Triax] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dr. Triax wrote:
I'm 45, LD triathlete. Use to eat a lot. Train always a lot, +16h/week year average, even during locked down. Close to 172lb (6'0) all year round. At the beginning of the locked down I star with the intermittent fasting just to stay focus on something new. Because of my family dynamic, I went for 19:5 for 6 days, then a 24h fasting the 7th (no training day). Did it for 10 weeks straight, then eased a little. Now I'm thinner than ever, and going hard on SBR.
In the 5h window I would eat twice, the first meal as much as I could put in (110% full), mostly complex carbs (mix of oat&cereal, fruit), dairy and +85% pure chocolate. The second and last with a big % of either meat, eggs, or fish, with potatoes/rice/bread, and greens (90% full). Repeat next day. I worked for me.

Is the 19:5 thing meaning you go 19 hours without food/drink other than water and only consume calories during that 5 hour window? If so, how do you stack that around your workouts? I am interested in learning more about this method and if I am understanding it correctly.

Ironman Lake Placid 2021| 70.3 Worlds St. George 2021
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MatthewLigman wrote:
Dr. Triax wrote:
I'm 45, LD triathlete. Use to eat a lot. Train always a lot, +16h/week year average, even during locked down. Close to 172lb (6'0) all year round. At the beginning of the locked down I star with the intermittent fasting just to stay focus on something new. Because of my family dynamic, I went for 19:5 for 6 days, then a 24h fasting the 7th (no training day). Did it for 10 weeks straight, then eased a little. Now I'm thinner than ever, and going hard on SBR.
In the 5h window I would eat twice, the first meal as much as I could put in (110% full), mostly complex carbs (mix of oat&cereal, fruit), dairy and +85% pure chocolate. The second and last with a big % of either meat, eggs, or fish, with potatoes/rice/bread, and greens (90% full). Repeat next day. I worked for me.


Is the 19:5 thing meaning you go 19 hours without food/drink other than water and only consume calories during that 5 hour window? If so, how do you stack that around your workouts? I am interested in learning more about this method and if I am understanding it correctly.

Yes, 19h with 0 calories intake. Just water/tea.
What I did: Woke up around 5:30am. First session fasted. Eat. 3-4 hours later, second session. Eat. Done training & eating till next day.
Now, with more intense workouts, I have a glass of milk before bed... technically breaking the 19h fasting. I'm not interested anymore in the beneficial effects (??) of the intermittent fasting, I rather focus in my performance. But the truth is that I am not experiencing any hunger during the fasting period. I guess having 0 anxiety/stress helps.

STRAVA INSTAGRAM
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Dr. Triax] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dr. Triax wrote:
MatthewLigman wrote:
Dr. Triax wrote:
I'm 45, LD triathlete. Use to eat a lot. Train always a lot, +16h/week year average, even during locked down. Close to 172lb (6'0) all year round. At the beginning of the locked down I star with the intermittent fasting just to stay focus on something new. Because of my family dynamic, I went for 19:5 for 6 days, then a 24h fasting the 7th (no training day). Did it for 10 weeks straight, then eased a little. Now I'm thinner than ever, and going hard on SBR.
In the 5h window I would eat twice, the first meal as much as I could put in (110% full), mostly complex carbs (mix of oat&cereal, fruit), dairy and +85% pure chocolate. The second and last with a big % of either meat, eggs, or fish, with potatoes/rice/bread, and greens (90% full). Repeat next day. I worked for me.


Is the 19:5 thing meaning you go 19 hours without food/drink other than water and only consume calories during that 5 hour window? If so, how do you stack that around your workouts? I am interested in learning more about this method and if I am understanding it correctly.

Yes, 19h with 0 calories intake. Just water/tea.
What I did: Woke up around 5:30am. First session fasted. Eat. 3-4 hours later, second session. Eat. Done training & eating till next day.
Now, with more intense workouts, I have a glass of milk before bed... technically breaking the 19h fasting. I'm not interested anymore in the beneficial effects (??) of the intermittent fasting, I rather focus in my performance. But the truth is that I am not experiencing any hunger during the fasting period. I guess having 0 anxiety/stress helps.

Where is the line between intermittent fasting and an eating disorder? Perhaps for a week or two, but not eating for around 20 hours (especially while training) is not healthy.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:
Where is the line between intermittent fasting and an eating disorder? Perhaps for a week or two, but not eating for around 20 hours (especially while training) is not healthy.

hmmm intermittent fasting is pretty much the opposite of an eating disorder ...

https://www.strava.com/...tes/zachary_mckinney
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [plant_based] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I aim to eat 10 servings of fruits or vegetables daily. Portion size; the size of your palm. If you eat that much fruit and vegetables it leaves less room for more calorie dense foods.

Eat to fuel. I eat enough so that I feel good and able to train but I really, really try to limit over-eating or mindlessly consuming foods.

Don't let myself get too hungry. If I get to the point where I am famished, I tend to overeat when I do sit down to food.

Don't deny yourself foods. For me, deciding to not eat chocolate chip cookies makes it so all I do is think about chocolate chip cookies.

Lastly, don't gain weight! If you get up five pounds in weight, start making changes now. I cannot figure out how some people gain 15-30 pounds in the "off-season" and then expect to get back down to race weight. Maybe that works at 25, but it gets harder every year. Don't do it!

----------------------------
Jason
None of the secrets of success will work unless you do.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [plant_based] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
plant_based wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Where is the line between intermittent fasting and an eating disorder? Perhaps for a week or two, but not eating for around 20 hours (especially while training) is not healthy.


hmmm intermittent fasting is pretty much the opposite of an eating disorder ...

Whenever I need to shake my head and roll my eyes, Ill know where to find you. What are you talking about? Just explain it to me like Im a 5 year old.

Intermittent fasting is not in itself disordered eating but it sure isn't the opposite of one. Rigid and super focussed food habits are a cornerstone of eating disorders so IF is definitely closer to that end of the spectrum than someone who eats 3 squares a day and doesn't sweat the details.

Professional Athlete: http://jordancheyne.wordpress.com/ http://www.strava.com/athletes/145340

Coaching Services:http://www.peakformcoaching.com/

Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.

My thoughts exactly. I'd love for someone to explain how consuming zero calories for 20 straight hours every day especially while training is healthy.

There are times when I really need a boost via calorie consumption and would be in a bad way without it. I just don't see how this works.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.

Soo, a "flexible uncontrolled" relationship with food, is the right thing? If you want to perform at (almost) anything, you better develop a more or less rigidly controlled relationship with it. Otherwise, it is caos, chance, luck... And as I understand it, rigidly controlled means a method. But I am not selling anything. Go with your own.

STRAVA INSTAGRAM
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Dr. Triax] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dr. Triax wrote:
Tom_hampton wrote:
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.

Soo, a "flexible uncontrolled" relationship with food, is the right thing? If you want to perform at (almost) anything, you better develop a more or less rigidly controlled relationship with it. Otherwise, it is caos, chance, luck... And as I understand it, rigidly controlled means a method. But I am not selling anything. Go with your own.

There is a difference between rigidly controlled and controlled. As he said, rigidly controlled (not flexible) = bad. Controlled (with flexibility) = good.

Every diet involves a degree of control and willpower. Rigidly controlled diets are a recipe for problems.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [wannabefaster] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wannabefaster wrote:

Don't deny yourself foods. For me, deciding to not eat chocolate chip cookies makes it so all I do is think about chocolate chip cookies.

!

or find a good alternative, such as quest bar cookies. most cookies use damaged fats(vegetable oils) that cause inflammation, or excess sugar
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Dr. Triax] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dr. Triax wrote:
Tom_hampton wrote:
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.


Soo, a "flexible uncontrolled" relationship with food, is the right thing? If you want to perform at (almost) anything, you better develop a more or less rigidly controlled relationship with it. Otherwise, it is caos, chance, luck... And as I understand it, rigidly controlled means a method. But I am not selling anything. Go with your own.

Nice strawman and false-dichotomy arguments all rolled into one.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
Dr. Triax wrote:
Tom_hampton wrote:
No it's not. It's the definition of one. As is any such rigidly controlled relationship with food.


Soo, a "flexible uncontrolled" relationship with food, is the right thing? If you want to perform at (almost) anything, you better develop a more or less rigidly controlled relationship with it. Otherwise, it is caos, chance, luck... And as I understand it, rigidly controlled means a method. But I am not selling anything. Go with your own.

Nice strawman and false-dichotomy arguments all rolled into one.

Lmao! I think you hit a nerve with that truth serum Tom.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:
My weight bounced all over the place last year. I got to a low of 145lbs (goal weight) and this offseason went close to 170lbs. It was brutal. I tried everything to get it off with no luck and stuck at 160lbs.

I'm now at 149lbs on a plant based diet. Lots of coffee (2 cups) and no limit on whole foods like oats, bananas, apples, kale, carrots, tomatoes, corn, chickpeas, black beans, edamame, lima beans, quinoa, wild rice, couscous, almond milk, peanut butter powder, etc.

I eat meat once or twice a week. It also has helped keep my blood sugar from spiking. No more cravings and binging on garbage.

Thanks for sharing this. I would have thought that all that carb heavy non meat food (that includes a lot of carbs) WOULD spike blood sugar even though its all good stuff versus a steak or chicken.

I went around 3 years of vegetarian and did get to my leanest ever, but it also came with a degree of calorie limitation. This was from 37-40 but it was just hard to maintain with business life. Right now I am ~5 lbs over my race weight between 37 and 40 but I am also 54 going soon to 55, so being within 5 lbs of my pre 40 year old race weight, which is also the same as my 19 year old weight is not that bad. I no longer try to calorie limit. I just eat to hunger. But pehaps I need to experiment a bit more with no meat as there are other reasons why it made me feel good.

As for the coffee, like you, 2 is my standard. I could easily go to 4 or 6 if I did not limit it. The quality of my sleep is better if I don't drink any caffeine after 12 pm. If quality of sleep is better, I stay leaner due to recovery being better.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 8, 20 14:39
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think a lot of times people don’t realize how many calories are in certain things and how much is burned when exercising. It’s very easy for example to eat an extra 300 calories and not notice, but to spend those calories I’d have to up my easy trainer ride that day from ~60 minutes to ~90 minutes.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am not searching for an excuse. Just wanted to share experiences.

Also, Your age absolutely matters. Your daily caloric needs decrease as you age and that starts to kick in around age 30.

You are correct that I should be counting calories. That is something that I have never done consistently.

My remedy is going to be the following:

  • Running more
  • Counting calories


Ironman Lake Placid 2021| 70.3 Worlds St. George 2021
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am not searching for an excuse. Just wanted to share experiences.

Also, Your age absolutely matters. Your daily caloric needs decrease as you age and that starts to kick in around age 30.

You are correct that I should be counting calories. That is something that I have never done consistently.

My remedy is going to be the following:

  • Running more
  • Counting calories

I think all the aging stuff is an excuse with a touch of reality, but at age 35 its mainly an excuse. I am 54 going on 55. Eat pretty well the volume of food now as at 20, but my calories in are much cleaner and I train a bit more than when I was 20 (I cover less ground in that time, so it means I am doing less work per hour, so I can't eat as much volume from dirty calories, or if I do, I have to do more annual hours). I have not had a beer since age 25 and any wine since age 37 too. So that probably helps.

I think one of the keys to avoid the negative impact of aging is be good to your organs. They are the factory repairing your body every night. Treat your organs well and they will help you stay lean. If you do things that hurt your organs that's just going to gnaw away are your body composition over time. Alcohol is one of those items, but a lot of unneccessary medication that people take in all the time won't help long term if you don't let your body's own systems step up...and of course getting regular sleep and managing stress.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm finding that I need to better to my spleen, and my left kidney.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.

Hah - tell that to my 18 year old self - I used to eat 2x what I eat now and not gain a pound despite trying super hard. Now at 45 I eat one extar thing and I gain weight. Age ABSOLUTELY matters for weight management. Just look at how many svelte 19 yr old Instagram models there are and compare to hwo many svelte 45yr old models there are...
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.

Speaking from a scientist's perspective this couldn't be more incorrect.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am 35 and I noticed that weight has been increasingly hard to lose. Two years ago I was racing triathlon in the 151-157lbs weight range. I was doing olympic and half ironman racing. Last year I did my first full distance and two half ironman races I weighed in at 162lbs for the Ironman and was right around those weights for my 70.3 races which I did on back to back weekends. This year I am putting in more consistent workouts with solid intensity and I am having trouble losing the weight. I got up to 180lbs at one point this spring and have been bouncing between 169-176lbs for the last few months.

The changes to my routine have been the follow:

  • Biking more consistently, at higher power, and for longer
  • Running at higher intensity but not doing as many LSD runs
  • Zero swimming, thanks COVID, but I never swam much anyway
  • I have cut out doing yoga. This is probably the biggest difference

I have added meat outside of shellfish back to the diet in the last year, but not much has changed diet wise other than that. I am eating more meat, though.

I am looking for some guidance on the changes you have made as you have aged and what has/has not worked for you. I know we are all different and what works for one person may not work for the next. But I have also read stories from folks about how things were just not the same a year later. I am looking forward to everyones response.


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:
Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.

it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.

it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you

I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.

you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ha look at any age-adjusted world record graphs of race times, and it's pretty freaking obvious that there is a dropoff with age. Not as big a dropoff to say 'woe is me I'm 50, if I were 20 I'd be world champion' (not even close!) but definitely a real SMALL dropoff.

That dropoff gets progressive bigger until at 60+ it's major.

Tri is nice though in that most typical AGers don't start seriously training all 3 triathlon sports until their 30s, so even at age 50+ you might be still getting gains in your weakest discipline to offset your declining strong one. I came from a running background, and am definitely getting slightly slower with time, but my swim gains have completely offset those losses.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.

you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts

Pretty please do some research rather than sticking with your incorrect premise. Time marches on for all and there are absolutely very well documented changes in body composition, hormones, metabolism with age even when correcting for all other factors. Sure, lifestyle absolutely has an impact on the slope of the slow decay, but nothing you do can make the line upsloping or even horizontal. Well maybe not nothing, you can go to an “anti-aging clinic†and get pumped full of testosterone but even that will eventually catch up.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [sylvius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sylvius wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.


you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts


Pretty please do some research rather than sticking with your incorrect premise. Time marches on for all and there are absolutely very well documented changes in body composition, hormones, metabolism with age even when correcting for all other factors. Sure, lifestyle absolutely has an impact on the slope of the slow decay, but nothing you do can make the line upsloping or even horizontal. Well maybe not nothing, you can go to an “anti-aging clinic†and get pumped full of testosterone but even that will eventually catch up.

We all want to be "that guy" who defies the odds, but eventually everyone's metabolism and from that associated performance degrades. The question is how to manage this better than the general population and your peers in sport. Some of this is also luck and the parents you pick and some of it is nurture in terms of what your parents injected into you with respect to how you eat, your sleeping habits, stress management, how they taught you to interact with others to get "more wins in life and be happier". All those will add up to good anti aging. Its thousands of little things that keep your body composition good with age (and your metabolism high). But its a ton of work on a lot of small items all the time 24x7x52.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [sylvius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sylvius wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.


you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts


Pretty please do some research rather than sticking with your incorrect premise. Time marches on for all and there are absolutely very well documented changes in body composition, hormones, metabolism with age even when correcting for all other factors. Sure, lifestyle absolutely has an impact on the slope of the slow decay, but nothing you do can make the line upsloping or even horizontal. Well maybe not nothing, you can go to an “anti-aging clinic†and get pumped full of testosterone but even that will eventually catch up.

That is my point, but sure get your 2 cents in. Otherwise we should all quit this sport at age 30 and go play golf
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
synthetic wrote:
sylvius wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.


you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts


Pretty please do some research rather than sticking with your incorrect premise. Time marches on for all and there are absolutely very well documented changes in body composition, hormones, metabolism with age even when correcting for all other factors. Sure, lifestyle absolutely has an impact on the slope of the slow decay, but nothing you do can make the line upsloping or even horizontal. Well maybe not nothing, you can go to an “anti-aging clinic†and get pumped full of testosterone but even that will eventually catch up.

That is my point, but sure get your 2 cents in. Otherwise we should all quit this sport at age 30 and go play golf

It's a young man's sport. The top guys are the young ITU guys and gals. It doesn't mean we quit the sport we love or that it doesn't help keep us in shape, but to say age doesn't play a factor in weight gain isn't accurate.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
sylvius wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:
synthetic wrote:
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.


it wouldnt slow down if you did not eat those foods with damaged fats (fries, soybean oil in shake = transfats). Transfats lower testosterone and raise estrogen. And to add the excess sugars in the shake eventually those insulin spikes will get to you


I can tell you I eat very clean at 42. Plant based diet with meat once or twice a week. I can gain weight very easy if I'm not extremely disciplined. When I was 20 I could eat anything and could not gain weight. Age is absolutely a big factor.


you missing my point? faster aging from earlier damage. the number means nothing. i know many 50-60 year olds beating on 20 year olds with out much degradation in their efforts


Pretty please do some research rather than sticking with your incorrect premise. Time marches on for all and there are absolutely very well documented changes in body composition, hormones, metabolism with age even when correcting for all other factors. Sure, lifestyle absolutely has an impact on the slope of the slow decay, but nothing you do can make the line upsloping or even horizontal. Well maybe not nothing, you can go to an “anti-aging clinic†and get pumped full of testosterone but even that will eventually catch up.


We all want to be "that guy" who defies the odds, but eventually everyone's metabolism and from that associated performance degrades. The question is how to manage this better than the general population and your peers in sport. Some of this is also luck and the parents you pick and some of it is nurture in terms of what your parents injected into you with respect to how you eat, your sleeping habits, stress management, how they taught you to interact with others to get "more wins in life and be happier". All those will add up to good anti aging. Its thousands of little things that keep your body composition good with age (and your metabolism high). But its a ton of work on a lot of small items all the time 24x7x52.

I have highlighted a few items above as they are the entire point of starting this thread.

  • Things change with age
  • What adjustments have you made
  • Did they help or hurt

Lets keep it going as I am liking a lot of the content that we are getting here.

Ironman Lake Placid 2021| 70.3 Worlds St. George 2021
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Hammer Down] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hammer Down wrote:
triczyk wrote:


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.


Speaking from a scientist's perspective this couldn't be more incorrect.


I think that, as a scentist, you're joking.

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.

Whatever your balance of that in / out is very bespoke to the person. whatever you want to call that balance (and how it changes over time) related to age or whatever, but its just a simple formula. this simple forumla will always hold true and is the only thing that matters.

end of story people.

and a 35 year old complaining about supposedly age-related issues is a joke. I'm 34 and I gain weight when I drink beer, eat like shit, and have a calorie surplus. duh.


also - to the commentor who related to his 19-year old self. I bet you that you burned a lot more calories "back in the day" - you walked more, ran more, stood up more, did manual-labor for work...you were passively more active.
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 11, 20 9:59
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
MatthewLigman wrote:
I am not searching for an excuse. Just wanted to share experiences.

Also, Your age absolutely matters. Your daily caloric needs decrease as you age and that starts to kick in around age 30.

You are correct that I should be counting calories. That is something that I have never done consistently.

My remedy is going to be the following:

  • Running more
  • Counting calories


I think all the aging stuff is an excuse with a touch of reality, but at age 35 its mainly an excuse. I am 54 going on 55. Eat pretty well the volume of food now as at 20, but my calories in are much cleaner and I train a bit more than when I was 20 (I cover less ground in that time, so it means I am doing less work per hour, so I can't eat as much volume from dirty calories, or if I do, I have to do more annual hours). I have not had a beer since age 25 and any wine since age 37 too. So that probably helps.

I think one of the keys to avoid the negative impact of aging is be good to your organs. They are the factory repairing your body every night. Treat your organs well and they will help you stay lean. If you do things that hurt your organs that's just going to gnaw away are your body composition over time. Alcohol is one of those items, but a lot of unneccessary medication that people take in all the time won't help long term if you don't let your body's own systems step up...and of course getting regular sleep and managing stress.

quoted for truth.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:

Have you ever heard that metabolism slows with age? It's why a 20 year old can eat a burger, fries, shake, for lunch and then smash pizza for dinner and not gain a pound. If you're 40 and try the same thing you come in 5 pounds heavier the next morning.

Calories in/out is huge, but to say age is an excuse simply isn't true. Age is a challenge in terms of keeping your weight down.

wrong. that 18 year old also smashes: (1) manual labor, (2) running around, (3) probably not snacking because of (1 &2) and other active things.

so wrong man.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.


It does. But it's a bit of knowledge of only limited utility on its own, not a be-all, end-all of understanding how to manage body composition over a lifetime.

It's one of the guiding principles in a long, complex discussion. Not a simple maxim that explains everything.

It's useful at times to describe the body as a simple thermodynamics black box with one simple input and one simple output.

At other times, it's useful to expand beyond that to describe the body in terms closer to what it really is: an extraordinarily complex system symphony of chemical reactions, etc.
Last edited by: trail: Jun 11, 20 10:09
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
triczyk wrote:

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.


It does. But it's a bit of knowledge of only limited utility on its own, not a be-all, end-all of understanding how to manage body composition over a lifetime.

It's one of the guiding principles in a long, complex discussion. Not a simple maxim that explains everything.

I'm addmintantly on a tear here, but in regards to solving for the equation of "lose / maintain / gain" weight - it always holds true.

understanding the inputs to that equation - yes, it varies. its complicated. but the formula will never let you down.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
its complicated. but the formula will never let you down.


It has, though, when used alone. Simply telling people to track calories and eat less to achieve a calorie deficit, without any other real education has proven to be very ineffective at achieving long-term improvement in body composition. Simply pointing at those people and saying, "No willpower!" isn't particularly useful.
Last edited by: trail: Jun 11, 20 10:11
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
triczyk wrote:
its complicated. but the formula will never let you down.


It has, though, when used alone. Simply telling people to track calories and eat less to achieve a calorie deficit, without any other real education has proven to be very ineffective at achieving long-term improvement in body composition. Simply pointing at those people and saying, "No willpower!" isn't particularly useful.


you're making a huge leap here...convincing someone else to lose weight vs. managing your own weight. I am assuming that a decent triathlete can be honest with him/herself. Tho the amount of dad bods I see at races is insane.

The formula never lets a reasonable, resilient, and thoughtful person down.

As you begin to track calories, you begin to read labels...as you read labels, you get curious about ingredients, and over the years, you figure out your system.


yes its work. shocking.
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 11, 20 10:23
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
triczyk wrote:
its complicated. but the formula will never let you down.


It has, though, when used alone. Simply telling people to track calories and eat less to achieve a calorie deficit, without any other real education has proven to be very ineffective at achieving long-term improvement in body composition. Simply pointing at those people and saying, "No willpower!" isn't particularly useful.


I think this is correct as well, but the physics/thermodynamics of what triczyk saying are also still correct. I think that's the point he's trying to get across. The common advice of "don't skip breakfast, you'll actually gain weight!" is a good example of the difference here. The part that's unsaid is "don't skip breakfast, you'll overeat at lunch and dinner and oversnack and gain weight". Cutting out ~1/3rd of your daily calories while changing nothing else is a great way to lose weight (not necessarily a safe/healthy/sustainable way though).

A few bits to consider in this discussion:
(1) A pound of fat is ~3500 calories and this doesn't depend on age
(2) A Big Mac is 563 calories and this doesn't depend on age
(3) Older cyclists are generally less efficient than younger cyclists, both at matched work rates and at work rates relative to some fitness-related standard. Likely extends to running and swimming too (harder to match work rates there, so less data).

Some examples of point #3:

https://journals.physiology.org/...plphysiol.00361.2013
https://link.springer.com/...07/s00421-015-3264-z
https://europepmc.org/article/med/20386335

So I think both points are correct:
(1) If you eat at a calorie surplus/deficit you'll gain/lose weight and this doesn't depend on age.
(2) If you eat a given amount of calories, it will feel like you have to "work harder" to burn those calories because you're generally a less efficient exerciser as you age.

Basal metabolic rate, which accounts for a large chunk of daily energy-out, also generally decreases with age although I'm not sure how fitness / maintaining muscle mass with age affects that.
Last edited by: rosshm: Jun 11, 20 10:47
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:

I think that, as a scentist, you're joking.

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.

Whatever your balance of that in / out is very bespoke to the person. whatever you want to call that balance (and how it changes over time) related to age or whatever, but its just a simple formula. this simple forumla will always hold true and is the only thing that matters.

end of story people.

and a 35 year old complaining about supposedly age-related issues is a joke. I'm 34 and I gain weight when I drink beer, eat like shit, and have a calorie surplus. duh.


also - to the commentor who related to his 19-year old self. I bet you that you burned a lot more calories "back in the day" - you walked more, ran more, stood up more, did manual-labor for work...you were passively more active.

Why do you keep talking? You clearly don't know shit about what you are blathering on about. You're 34---not that that inherently means you're stupid. But, you have ZERO experience with what you are claiming to be true.

I'm 51. I've been an athlete since I was 4. I've tracked my body weight, calorie in/out in one way or another, bf% once the tech was available, with varying degrees of precision since you were 9. I've gained shittons of weight, and I've lost the same shit-tons of weight since I became an adult athlete. I've trained seasons at 20+ hours a week, and seasons at 8 hrs per week. I know what my daily non-exercise based consumption was at 25, what my s/b/r calories per mile at 25...and all that data at 51 and most ages in-between. I still have spreadsheets with all this shit in it from the 1990s for fucks sake.

I may not be a nutritionist, or a physiologist, or a doctor...but, I know my own body pretty damn well over 5 decades of living with it, and 3 decades of collecting data on it. There ABSOLUTELY is a significant slow down in both RMR, and active metabolic rates. Even when adjusted for activity level there is still a CLEAR age component in caloric expenditure. There are fundamental shifts in the way your body metabolizes subtrates, and utilizes stored fats as you age as well.

However, all of that is barely preceptible at age 34/35. So, yeah...these effects have negligible impacts on the mid-30s athlete. In that specific context, I agree its largely a crutch.

Its WAAAY beyond that at age 51....and it doesn't get better from there.

Yes, calories in / calories out still works. But, as calories OUT goes DOWN (for the reasons mentioned above)...the margin for error gets smaller---you're playing limbo with a lower bar. The ability for consumption to outpace expenditure goes up significantly with age, as expenditure goes down...and appetite remains largely unaffected.

It takes significantly more vigilance to maintain a deficit at 51 than it did at 27---because at 27 I burned 5000 calories a day. I was mostly unable to consume that much food without just eating a gallon of icecream. In the last three years I can count the number of times I've exceeded 3500 calories expended on two hands...and I don't recall breaking 4000 even once.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
triczyk wrote:


I think that, as a scentist, you're joking.

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.

Whatever your balance of that in / out is very bespoke to the person. whatever you want to call that balance (and how it changes over time) related to age or whatever, but its just a simple formula. this simple forumla will always hold true and is the only thing that matters.

end of story people.

and a 35 year old complaining about supposedly age-related issues is a joke. I'm 34 and I gain weight when I drink beer, eat like shit, and have a calorie surplus. duh.


also - to the commentor who related to his 19-year old self. I bet you that you burned a lot more calories "back in the day" - you walked more, ran more, stood up more, did manual-labor for work...you were passively more active.


Why do you keep talking? You clearly don't know shit about what you are blathering on about. You're 34---not that that inherently means you're stupid. But, you have ZERO experience with what you are claiming to be true.

I'm 51. I've been an athlete since I was 4. I've tracked my body weight, calorie in/out in one way or another, bf% once the tech was available, with varying degrees of precision since you were 9. I've gained shittons of weight, and I've lost the same shit-tons of weight since I became an adult athlete. I've trained seasons at 20+ hours a week, and seasons at 8 hrs per week. I know what my daily non-exercise based consumption was at 25, what my s/b/r calories per mile at 25...and all that data at 51 and most ages in-between. I still have spreadsheets with all this shit in it from the 1990s for fucks sake.

I may not be a nutritionist, or a physiologist, or a doctor...but, I know my own body pretty damn well over 5 decades of living with it, and 3 decades of collecting data on it. There ABSOLUTELY is a significant slow down in both RMR, and active metabolic rates. Even when adjusted for activity level there is still a CLEAR age component in caloric expenditure. There are fundamental shifts in the way your body metabolizes subtrates, and utilizes stored fats as you age as well.

However, all of that is barely preceptible at age 34/35. So, yeah...these effects have negligible impacts on the mid-30s athlete. In that specific context, I agree its largely a crutch.

Its WAAAY beyond that at age 51....and it doesn't get better from there.

Yes, calories in / calories out still works. But, as calories OUT goes DOWN (for the reasons mentioned above)...the margin for error gets smaller---you're playing limbo with a lower bar. The ability for consumption to outpace expenditure goes up significantly with age, as expenditure goes down...and appetite remains largely unaffected.

It takes significantly more vigilance to maintain a deficit at 51 than it did at 27---because at 27 I burned 5000 calories a day. I was mostly unable to consume that much food without just eating a gallon of icecream. In the last three years I can count the number of times I've exceeded 3500 calories expended on two hands...and I don't recall breaking 4000 even once.


well I keep talking because you don't listen. You just re-iterated what I said. Thank you!

Age is not making you fat, its one's inability to evolve the intake that is making you fat. This is where folks in any age cohort will start bitching about how they can't eat what they used to, etc. etc.


I might be only 34 but my father is 70 and still boasts a visible 6 pack and can bench 225lbs...oh, and he's 5'7'' and weighs 140. Picked up lifting at age 60 and weighed 155 at the time.

Calories In - Calories Out = weight management at any age.

Yes you have to learn how your calories out changes over time.
Yes you have to understand the quality and content of your calories in.


but aside from that, it is the only formula that matters!
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 11, 20 13:21
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree 100% with you. I am 53, and at age 40 I weighed 158 lbs. I now weigh 175 lbs. I am eating the same. Now some of that is due to being a cyclist and not a runner. I used to run 50-60 mpw and could eat anything I wanted. Now I ride 7-8 hours per week, most of it at a high intensity, with zero running. And yet I cannot lose more than a few lbs. My metabolism has absolutely changed significantly since age 40.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Pieman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pieman wrote:
I agree 100% with you. I am 53, and at age 40 I weighed 158 lbs. I now weigh 175 lbs. I am eating the same. Now some of that is due to being a cyclist and not a runner. I used to run 50-60 mpw and could eat anything I wanted. Now I ride 7-8 hours per week, most of it at a high intensity, with zero running. And yet I cannot lose more than a few lbs. My metabolism has absolutely changed significantly since age 40.

lol sure you can. this is the classic example. You just don't want to lose weight.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [rosshm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rosshm wrote:

(2) A Big Mac is 563 calories and this doesn't depend on age


The big mac has 1.3g of transfat, and artificial fat the body cannot metabolize so it fails the calories/in out principle (mostly in the bread and sauce from damaged soybean oil). So 12 of those 563 calories remain 'permanent' calories collecting in your arteries, colon, or breast tissue. So you can only 'burn' at most 551 calories. Unless you get arterial scraping surgery done.
Last edited by: synthetic: Jun 11, 20 13:51
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:

well I keep talking because you don't listen. You just re-iterated what I said. Thank you!

Age is not making you fat, its one's inability to evolve the intake that is making you fat. This is where folks in any age cohort will start bitching about how they can't eat what they used to, etc. etc.


I might be only 34 but my father is 70 and still boasts a visible 6 pack and can bench 225lbs...oh, and he's 5'7'' and weighs 140. Picked up lifting at age 60 and weighed 155 at the time.

Calories In - Calories Out = weight management at any age.

Yes you have to learn how your calories out changes over time.
Yes you have to understand the quality and content of your calories in.


but aside from that, it is the only formula that matters!


Did I say I was "fat"? No, I belive I already noted on page 1, I'm 5'11" / 145 lbs, ~10% body fat. I weighed 142 at 19. I weighed 170 at age 27 after getting married and having three kids. I lost 25 lbs in 2 months, then. I weighed 210 at age 45 after a 10 year battle with an overuse injury. I lost 60 lbs in 9 months. I know how it works----I've done it...at both age ranges. I've done it at age 27. I've done it at age 45. and I know how to KEEP IT OFF at age 51.


ETA:
Quote:
Yes you have to learn how your calories out changes over time.

That's the REAL point. And THAT is what's hard as a Master Athlete. Yes, fine thermodynamics is true. But...weight-loss is a psychological problem, not a thermodynamics problem.

I still have the brain of that 19 year old. I still have the appetite and portion concept of that 19 year old (I can still easily devour a bag of doritos, or a gallon of ice cream, or a 6 pack of Coke...or god dammit... all three). I still have the athletic drive of that 19 year old, and I'm still pretty fucking fast (for a M50-54 year old). But, I cannot eat like he did. period. So, I don't---that is not easy, because I used to...and I sometimes WANT to.

It IS harder at one age versus another. Becuase it gets harder and harder to eat small enough amounts of food. I count my calories, daily. I probably border on having an eating disorder from the level of "rigor" I exert over my consumption.

Age is not an EXCUSE any more than any other obstacle. But, it IS AN OBSTACLE that must be overcome. You can't go around it, you can wish it away. Well you can, but that only works one way...weight managment is less of an issue then. To suggest that it is NOT an obstacle (as a 34 year old...Ha!) is ...well... the height of arrogance. You will learn....in 16 years. You may....like me (and your dad)...learn how to manage it and overcome it. Or you may give up and just get fat---because it is work. But either way....you will learn.
Last edited by: Tom_hampton: Jun 11, 20 15:06
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
synthetic wrote:
rosshm wrote:

(2) A Big Mac is 563 calories and this doesn't depend on age


The big mac has 1.3g of transfat, and artificial fat the body cannot metabolize so it fails the calories/in out principle (mostly in the bread and sauce from damaged soybean oil). So 12 of those 563 calories remain 'permanent' calories collecting in your arteries, colon, or breast tissue. So you can only 'burn' at most 551 calories. Unless you get arterial scraping surgery done.


Ok. virtually ALL of that is WRONG---or, at best, wildly misleading.

That is nto to say that transfats aren't bad. They CLEARLY are. But, not for the reasons you are listing.
Last edited by: Tom_hampton: Jun 11, 20 14:33
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Pieman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pieman wrote:
I agree 100% with you. I am 53, and at age 40 I weighed 158 lbs. I now weigh 175 lbs. I am eating the same. Now some of that is due to being a cyclist and not a runner. I used to run 50-60 mpw and could eat anything I wanted. Now I ride 7-8 hours per week, most of it at a high intensity, with zero running. And yet I cannot lose more than a few lbs. My metabolism has absolutely changed significantly since age 40.

See above. It can be done. I did it in my late 40s....and I continue to manage it now. It does take some work, and learning to understand your "behaviors". I found that high intensity (zone4+) was counter-productive---it stimulated my desire to eat, too strongly. Also, excessively long workouts had a similar impact. I found that any workout that I couldn't complete without pre/during/post fueling simply increased my appetite to compensate...and, usually in excess of what was needed for balance.

I lost 60 lbs by walking and easy cycling...and, sometimes nothing except normal life...never more than about 6 hours a week back then. I also consumed 1200 calories a day with a 1000 cal/day deficit...sustained for 9 months. I averaged a loss rate of 1.7 lbs per week over that time period.

The hard part is that 400 calories is a small meal. It doesn't look like, or feel like enough food. I switched to using a salad plate instead of a normal plate...just so I wouldn't see all the open space on the plate. The psychology here is important...a point lost on our young-whipper-snapper.

I transitioned to a diet much higher in protein (2 g/kg lbm) and lower in carbs. I ended up with an almost even distribution between Pro/Cho/Fat 1/3rd / 1/3rd / 1/3rd. Not exactly on purpose.

Yes, its harder. But, harder is not a reason to not do the work.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
synthetic wrote:
rosshm wrote:

(2) A Big Mac is 563 calories and this doesn't depend on age


The big mac has 1.3g of transfat, and artificial fat the body cannot metabolize so it fails the calories/in out principle (mostly in the bread and sauce from damaged soybean oil). So 12 of those 563 calories remain 'permanent' calories collecting in your arteries, colon, or breast tissue. So you can only 'burn' at most 551 calories. Unless you get arterial scraping surgery done.

That's both completely incorrect and irrelevant to anything I said.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [rosshm] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rosshm wrote:
synthetic wrote:
rosshm wrote:

(2) A Big Mac is 563 calories and this doesn't depend on age


The big mac has 1.3g of transfat, and artificial fat the body cannot metabolize so it fails the calories/in out principle (mostly in the bread and sauce from damaged soybean oil). So 12 of those 563 calories remain 'permanent' calories collecting in your arteries, colon, or breast tissue. So you can only 'burn' at most 551 calories. Unless you get arterial scraping surgery done.


That's both completely incorrect and irrelevant to anything I said.

if incorrect prove it. studies shown there is no liver enzyme that can burn artificial transfat. It causes heart disease, and cancer of breast/colon
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
triczyk wrote:

well I keep talking because you don't listen. You just re-iterated what I said. Thank you!

Age is not making you fat, its one's inability to evolve the intake that is making you fat. This is where folks in any age cohort will start bitching about how they can't eat what they used to, etc. etc.


I might be only 34 but my father is 70 and still boasts a visible 6 pack and can bench 225lbs...oh, and he's 5'7'' and weighs 140. Picked up lifting at age 60 and weighed 155 at the time.

Calories In - Calories Out = weight management at any age.

Yes you have to learn how your calories out changes over time.
Yes you have to understand the quality and content of your calories in.


but aside from that, it is the only formula that matters!


Did I say I was "fat"? No, I belive I already noted on page 1, I'm 5'11" / 145 lbs, ~10% body fat. I weighed 142 at 19. I weighed 170 at age 27 after getting married and having three kids. I lost 25 lbs in 2 months, then. I weighed 210 at age 45 after a 10 year battle with an overuse injury. I lost 60 lbs in 9 months. I know how it works----I've done it...at both age ranges. I've done it at age 27. I've done it at age 45. and I know how to KEEP IT OFF at age 51.


ETA:
Quote:

Yes you have to learn how your calories out changes over time.


That's the REAL point. And THAT is what's hard as a Master Athlete. Yes, fine thermodynamics is true. But...weight-loss is a psychological problem, not a thermodynamics problem.

I still have the brain of that 19 year old. I still have the appetite and portion concept of that 19 year old (I can still easily devour a bag of doritos, or a gallon of ice cream, or a 6 pack of Coke...or god dammit... all three). I still have the athletic drive of that 19 year old, and I'm still pretty fucking fast (for a M50-54 year old). But, I cannot eat like he did. period. So, I don't---that is not easy, because I used to...and I sometimes WANT to.

It IS harder at one age versus another. Becuase it gets harder and harder to eat small enough amounts of food. I count my calories, daily. I probably border on having an eating disorder from the level of "rigor" I exert over my consumption.

Age is not an EXCUSE any more than any other obstacle. But, it IS AN OBSTACLE that must be overcome. You can't go around it, you can wish it away. Well you can, but that only works one way...weight managment is less of an issue then. To suggest that it is NOT an obstacle (as a 34 year old...Ha!) is ...well... the height of arrogance. You will learn....in 16 years. You may....like me (and your dad)...learn how to manage it and overcome it. Or you may give up and just get fat---because it is work. But either way....you will learn.


We are in violent agreement with one another just using different terms to get to the same point

While I am claiming “age is not a factor†I’m simply stating that age is not an obstacle that cannot be overcome. I’m exaggerating to make the point.

Ultimately it’s willpower / discipline that is a factor.

I have a huge pet peeve with folks who say they’re getting fat because of age etc. I think it should be just said as it is “I am getting fat because I eat too much for my level of activity and daily calorie burnâ€

Obviously based on your stats, you know this already and have no issues (but not without a lot of work and daily discipline )
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 12, 20 4:57
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think you may be too quick to discount genetics and as well, patting yourself on the back for all your self-proclaimed discipline.

There ARE many body types due to genetics. Some folks for sure will stay thin even into their 60s very easily without even trying, and some folks will never be considered 'thin' without having a real eating disorder.

It does get generally harder to stay thin for everyone as they age, but odds are good you were given the thinner genes if your family members who are old are thin. Thats just luck and genetics.

Triathlon and endurance sports tends to attract and keep people on the lighter side because the results reward it. Folks whose body types tend toward NFL, powerlifting, and sumo tend not to stick around as long or gravitate naturally toward the sports that reward that body type. I'd like to see triathletes crow about their awesome self-discipline about weight control when theyre asked to bulk up to 300 lbs with stacked muscle as expected of NFL linebackers. Suddenly not so realistic. It works both ways.

Willpower counts - but it's a lot smaller a factor than people think. And yes, I've got tons of willpower and I'm not fat (still got the 6-pack in my mid40s), and if there's anything I've learned by expending so much willpower in my life (national-class musician, top Ivy league honors scholar, dual medical degree, blah blah blah) its that one almost always overestimates one's willpower and underestimates the genetic contribution. In my case, my willpower is almost certainly genetically determined - as I've aged up I've seen how machinelike and remorseless my parents can be about accomplishing goals - to a pathologic degree. So I'm not so keen on crowing at how awesome my willpower is.

Your metabolic setpoint for your genetic body weight >>>>> willpower. Even if calories in < calories out continues to hold true - because of how powerful metabolic control of hunger is. Throw in modern bad food environments, and it amplifies the bad effects of weight gain. Willpower absolutely helps, but its role is smaller than you think when it comes to getting an obese or even overweight person to -7 or more BMI points.
Last edited by: lightheir: Jun 12, 20 6:18
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
I think you may be too quick to discount genetics and as well, patting yourself on the back for all your self-proclaimed discipline.

There ARE many body types due to genetics. Some folks for sure will stay thin even into their 60s very easily without even trying, and some folks will never be considered 'thin' without having a real eating disorder.

It does get generally harder to stay thin for everyone as they age, but odds are good you were given the thinner genes if your family members who are old are thin. Thats just luck and genetics.

Triathlon and endurance sports tends to attract and keep people on the lighter side because the results reward it. Folks whose body types tend toward NFL, powerlifting, and sumo tend not to stick around as long or gravitate naturally toward the sports that reward that body type. I'd like to see triathletes crow about their awesome self-discipline about weight control when theyre asked to bulk up to 300 lbs with stacked muscle as expected of NFL linebackers. Suddenly not so realistic. It works both ways.

Willpower counts - but it's a lot smaller a factor than people think. And yes, I've got tons of willpower and I'm not fat (still got the 6-pack in my mid40s), and if there's anything I've learned by expending so much willpower in my life (national-class musician, top Ivy league honors scholar, dual medical degree, blah blah blah) its that one almost always overestimates one's willpower and underestimates the genetic contribution. In my case, my willpower is almost certainly genetically determined - as I've aged up I've seen how machinelike and remorseless my parents can be about accomplishing goals - to a pathologic degree. So I'm not so keen on crowing at how awesome my willpower is.

The example of his father is a genetic exception and probably he falls into this category being his father has a very efficient metabolism for his age.

It's a fact that metabolism slows as we age. For a select few It's at a smaller rate due to great genetics. Another error he is making is saying it can be overcome with exercise. You can't out train a bad diet. Diet is key, but for most of us we will be fighting a much slower metabolism as we age even with good genetics. No amount of activity level alone can ocercome it.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Pieman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pieman wrote:
I agree 100% with you. I am 53, and at age 40 I weighed 158 lbs. I now weigh 175 lbs. I am eating the same. Now some of that is due to being a cyclist and not a runner. I used to run 50-60 mpw and could eat anything I wanted. Now I ride 7-8 hours per week, most of it at a high intensity, with zero running. And yet I cannot lose more than a few lbs. My metabolism has absolutely changed significantly since age 40.

The problem I have found is that biking simply does not jack up the metabolism to the same degree as running (my N=1 observation). I think part of it is that it is not a full body sport, does not use the core much, and is non weight bearing....the moment I get off the bike, my metabolism goes back to "watching NFL on the couch metabolism". When I finish a run, my body is revv'd up for several hours rebuilding from the run (thus jacking up the metabolism). The same mechanics that allows me to be able to do a 30 hrs week of biking (I have done several in my life on training camps), works against me from barely being able to do an 8-10 hrs week of running. Running just involves too much "repair" offline ffrom the actual run which limits volume while doing the sport, because there is more work after the sport is done. I can also get there with swimming because I can do a bit more volume than with running, but the intensity is waaaaaaaay higher, so it jacks up my metabolism outside the swim. I almost never do a swim session that is 100% easy. There is always intensity and its full body.

Cycling involves more low intensity than most of us think. There is a ton of coasting and recovering that you don't have in run and swim.

So while aging and lowering of metabolism outside sport is a problem, doing less running is a huge problem, and if you can't swim really hard all the time, doing more volume swimming than running, you probably cannot stay lean swimming either (25km week of swimming is barely 8 hrs....I need 40km swim week if swimming only to lean up.....25km week just keeps me at whatever body composition I am at....10km week makes me fat).

If I do single sport only

swimming 10-12 hrs, running 8-10 hrs or biking 16-20 hrs I can sustain the same body composition and with some eating management get lean
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You bring up an interesting point about running and how it jumpstarts the metabolism. I have noticed that as well. When I was a runner, I would bang out 10 mile runs almost every day before work. I noticed that I was mentally alert all morning, fired up with a lot of energy, basically feeling like I could do anything. Maybe that is the runners high they talk about. I do not feel the same way after cycling.

On the other hand, my body feels so much better cycling and not running due to the non-weight bearing. My legs and hips would feel beat up after almost every run as I reached my late 40s, and finally it got to be too much to continue.

I clearly need to adjust my calorie intake though if I want to get back under 170 lbs. I wish I could swim like you do, but I suck at swimming. I only did it to be able to race tris.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Pieman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For me part of the path to be able to do higher volume swimming was learning all 4 strokes and then also doing kick sets in all 4 strokes. That gives you 8 options without killing the shoulders and the intensity is way higher than what you can sustain running. But you also need pool access and organize life around that. Running is way easier. Out the front door, hammer for 50-80 minutes, finish and get on with life 5 min later.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Pieman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pieman wrote:
You bring up an interesting point about running and how it jumpstarts the metabolism. I have noticed that as well. When I was a runner, I would bang out 10 mile runs almost every day before work. I noticed that I was mentally alert all morning, fired up with a lot of energy, basically feeling like I could do anything. Maybe that is the runners high they talk about. I do not feel the same way after cycling.

On the other hand, my body feels so much better cycling and not running due to the non-weight bearing. My legs and hips would feel beat up after almost every run as I reached my late 40s, and finally it got to be too much to continue.

I clearly need to adjust my calorie intake though if I want to get back under 170 lbs. I wish I could swim like you do, but I suck at swimming. I only did it to be able to race tris.

It doesn't need to be running. I'm not sure that there's any science to backup Dev's claim regard Cycling vs. Running in terms of extending the metabolic activity post-exercise, either.

I lost 60 lbs walking (6-10 miles a day) and some (weekend) cycling. For me the key was frequent light activity throughout the day. I'd walk 2 miles in the morning, 1 mile morning break, 3 miles at lunch, 1 mile afternoon break, and another 3 miles after work.

Also what I learned was that any calorie burn above 1000 cal per day, just raised the consumption floor. A deficit greater than 1000 cal/day isn't sustainable for very long at all---so, expenditure above that just means you have to eat more. In some ways that makes getting under the "limbo bar" easier...to a point. But, there came a point of diminishing return...and, for me a point of reversal where it was counter-productive, because its like the appetite exceeds the need. As I mentioned above, intensity seems to exacerbate that problem---the brain says, "Must have Carbs....NOW!" Deny that for very long, and you find yourself asleep on the couch with an empty dorito bag over your head.

You don't create your deficit with exercise. You create the deficit with diet. Exercise just gives you some headroom to make the calorie restriction less sensitive to error.

Finally, the biggest takeaway (for me) to understand? You WILL be hungry. Period. For about a week---the first few days more than the last. After that, my brain seemed to adjust and accept the "new normal". I tried to think that every time I felt hungry that was more weight melting away. Understanding that, made it easier to work my way through. After that first week, it was simply about replicating every day just like the last.

I had short term goals that I focused on. First weigh-in below 190. Last weigh-in above 190. Repeat for each 10 lbs. I weighed myself eery day (still do). My weekly weight fluctuates by about 4 lbs. So, each one of those goals took about 2 weeks to process through. With 2-3 weeks in between. There was always an "almost there" level of anticipation (ie, a so-called "carrot" to chase) that kept my head in the game.

I ate lots of protein, similar calories from fat (the good ones), modest amounts of carbs...low glycemic index / high-fiber / whole grains. Very little sugar. Alcohol on Fri/Sat only. I didn't do cheat/free-for-all days---because it doesn't work for my brain. I just saw them as setbacks---I'd rather just stay on-plan.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well said Tom. When you are going through 5000 calories a day all it takes to lose weight is to ease your foot off the food pedal. Drink 2 beers instead of 4. Not so hard. At 54 which is my age you have to almost not depress it at all.

They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot

Last edited by: spockwaslen: Jun 12, 20 10:34
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
triczyk wrote:
Hammer Down wrote:
triczyk wrote:


your weight gain has nothing to do with age. Its all the same formula - calories in / calories out. You're eating more. I hate this age-related weight loss crap. Your age is not an excuse.


Speaking from a scientist's perspective this couldn't be more incorrect.


I think that, as a scentist, you're joking.

calories in vs. calories out always holds true.

Whatever your balance of that in / out is very bespoke to the person. whatever you want to call that balance (and how it changes over time) related to age or whatever, but its just a simple formula. this simple forumla will always hold true and is the only thing that matters.

end of story people.

and a 35 year old complaining about supposedly age-related issues is a joke. I'm 34 and I gain weight when I drink beer, eat like shit, and have a calorie surplus. duh.


also - to the commentor who related to his 19-year old self. I bet you that you burned a lot more calories "back in the day" - you walked more, ran more, stood up more, did manual-labor for work...you were passively more active.

Your posts show a major lack of understanding of the complex relationship between age, enzyme function, liver and pancreatic function, metabolic factors, tissue remodeling, hormonal changes, etc etc. I am currently on the research team of the one of the leaders in this field of research and while your elementary model of total calories plays a role, it ignores the myriad of other factors that play a very large role in body comp.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
Alcohol on Fri/Sat only. I didn't do cheat/free-for-all days-


I love you how said you don't do cheat days after revealing your alcohol cheat days. :)

Good post, though. It takes that kind of introspection to find a set of habits that work well for you, in my experience. I stopped drinking alcohol altogether, except a beer when going out with buddies (which given the 'vid means I haven't had a beer in months). I don't miss it.
Last edited by: trail: Jun 12, 20 10:36
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
Tom_hampton wrote:
Alcohol on Fri/Sat only. I didn't do cheat/free-for-all days-


I love you how said you don't do cheat days after revealing your alcohol cheat days. :)

Good post, though. It takes that kind of introspection to find a set of habits that work well for you, in my experience. I stopped drinking alcohol altogether, except a beer when going out with buddies (which given the 'vid means I haven't had a beer in months). I don't miss it.

Alcohol calories were always accounted for and decremented from other calorie sources. So, notwithstanding the metabolic depression effects of alcohol, they were not "cheats". As such, I rarely consumed more than 2 drinks...because, beyond that it detracted from needed real nutrition.

A cheat day to me is/was a day were you do NOT maintain the deficit. Consume what you want, in whatever quantity you want---ideally without tracking. Its supposed to be a "mental break" from the process. I know some people find it helpful...I did not. I can't stop myself from adding the calories up in my head...so, I knew that I'd just blown three days of work, and its going to take another half-week to get back to where I was....yesterday. I found that disheartening. It wasn't worth the food-gasm.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom_hampton wrote:
A cheat day to me is/was a day were you do NOT maintain the deficit.

I get it. Just giving you a hard time.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
Tom_hampton wrote:

A cheat day to me is/was a day were you do NOT maintain the deficit.


I get it. Just giving you a hard time.

Nor was that fact lost on me. :-)

Nevertheless, someone else might misunderstand the difference---so, it seemed worth clarifying. Instead of just calling you an asshole. (the nicest thing I can call someone :-).
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
I think you may be too quick to discount genetics and as well, patting yourself on the back for all your self-proclaimed discipline.

There ARE many body types due to genetics. Some folks for sure will stay thin even into their 60s very easily without even trying, and some folks will never be considered 'thin' without having a real eating disorder.

It does get generally harder to stay thin for everyone as they age, but odds are good you were given the thinner genes if your family members who are old are thin. Thats just luck and genetics.

Triathlon and endurance sports tends to attract and keep people on the lighter side because the results reward it. Folks whose body types tend toward NFL, powerlifting, and sumo tend not to stick around as long or gravitate naturally toward the sports that reward that body type. I'd like to see triathletes crow about their awesome self-discipline about weight control when theyre asked to bulk up to 300 lbs with stacked muscle as expected of NFL linebackers. Suddenly not so realistic. It works both ways.

Willpower counts - but it's a lot smaller a factor than people think. And yes, I've got tons of willpower and I'm not fat (still got the 6-pack in my mid40s), and if there's anything I've learned by expending so much willpower in my life (national-class musician, top Ivy league honors scholar, dual medical degree, blah blah blah) its that one almost always overestimates one's willpower and underestimates the genetic contribution. In my case, my willpower is almost certainly genetically determined - as I've aged up I've seen how machinelike and remorseless my parents can be about accomplishing goals - to a pathologic degree. So I'm not so keen on crowing at how awesome my willpower is.

Your metabolic setpoint for your genetic body weight >>>>> willpower. Even if calories in < calories out continues to hold true - because of how powerful metabolic control of hunger is. Throw in modern bad food environments, and it amplifies the bad effects of weight gain. Willpower absolutely helps, but its role is smaller than you think when it comes to getting an obese or even overweight person to -7 or more BMI points.


I can appreciate your self-proclaimed accomplishments and perspectives. Genetics I'm sure play a small role but it is your perspective that gives a vast majority (in my opinion) of obese people (or even those trying to lose that last 15 pounds) the free "get out of jail card", that card being the gene-excuse.

Its bull.

No, my father does not get to the way he is because of genes. He was easily 25-30 pounds heavier when he ate more "normally" - and he could have easily gained another 40 from there if he were lazy. Would that +80 pounds have been because of his bad genes? Or was it that he was able to lose weight because of his discipline - he eats 100% meals from home, usually plant-based, with no salt or preservatives.

Your example of becoming a 300 pound power lifter is not a bad one - but please realize (use one of the degrees) that, as with becoming a good triathlete, it would take years of discipline - and there are certainly hurdles in regards to muscle development (not the point of this thread) as you age. But if you were to start the journey in your late 20s / early 30s, you'd get there in 5-7 years. While I weigh 155 now, I used to push 200 pounds in my "powerlifting" days of my early-to-mid 20s. If I kept up with it, I'm sure I could have gotten to what you speak of, or at least close enough. Oh, and I was always the chubby kid growing up. Thanks god for discipline and willpower.

I wont reply to this thread again as we won't convince each other - but I'll stick to the discipline approach for myself and folks close to me as we'll see how it all ends up.
Last edited by: triczyk: Jun 15, 20 7:05
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [triczyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hah - genetics is the BIG majority of triathlon performance once you're past the totally detrained state.

If you think it's all your hard work that's getting you far, you're absolutely mistaken. Hard work definitely makes genetics and talent express itself, but without the genetics/talent to begin with, fuggetabout it.

If you don't have world-class powerlifter size, NOTHING you will do will get you there. Even if you started training from birth. This very thing happens all the time already in aspiring NBA basketball players from around the world. Their parents get them into bball from age 3, and these kids love it - enough that they want to play nonstop in the most competitive leagues until they are college aged. Only a tiny fraction of them are naturally tall and athletic enough to make it, even if they were great high school players. And only an even smaller fraction become an NBA player. Motivation, training, and resources are not limiters for these players, as they've got all of that and them some. But they lack the genetics to go NBA.

There is similarly, no way in hell that you take a naturally huge world class sumo wrestler, and even if you trained him in triathlon from birth, make him into an elite level triathlete in today's competitive climate. He actually would be unlikely to even may it even to Kona as an AGer even if he trained nonstop, had all the resources and coaching he needed, etc. The body type is just wrong for the sport.

And while I don't deny most Americans have bad eating habits that lead to obesity, genetics still rules the roost. Even for you, if you think you're in race weight - how hard would it be if your coach asked you to drop another 10 lbs? You absolutely COULD, with calories in < calories out. It just becomes exponentially harder to do so once you're super lean, to the point that you may have to have a dangerous eating disorder to even pull it off. So think of that before you pat yourself on the back at how disciplined you are about maintaing your weight - odds are extremely high that genetics accounts for 80+% of your success.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My routine was also affected due to Covid, i've changed my workout routine. In my home garage i've not much equipment, so i often do body weight exercises for staying fit.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am now 48 and 5'8'' and weigh 147, its the lightest I have been since the age of 15
When I was 42, I weighed 210. Working on the corporate treadmill, young kids, and a love of food all had a pretty big toll on my weight
I started Triathlons when I was 42, and got myself into shape. I started to watch what I ate, but did not diet specifically. Stopped snacking, when on business trips I skipped starter and desert at the restaurant. Combined with increase in exercise, weight dropped to 175 relatively easily.

I then got stuck at 175. At this time I was becoming quite good at triathlons, with the occasional AG podium in local races. I was also making the step up to 70.3 and Ironman distance. With an increase in training load (about 7 hours per week) I started to take my diet more seriously, reducing Pasta and bread, and eating more fruit. I got my weight down to 165. For the next couple of years my weight fluctuated between 160 and 175. Around Christmas I would be at 175, and lose it pretty easily in Jan and Feb, but no matter what I did, no matter how much I was training I could not get below 160. I was now training an average of 11 hours per week, I qualified for the 70.3 worlds in Nice and represented Switzerland at the ITU final in Lausanne, and brought my 70.3 time to under 4:30 and Ironman time to just over 10hrs

This brings me up to this year. Unlike the previous 4 years, I maintained a much better weight over Christmas, and didn't go above 165. As 2020 was supposed to be the year I qualify for Kona, I also ramped my training to 15 hours per week. At the same time, I gave up eating meat in January, and decided to carry on through to March. My diet was mainly whole food, plant based, with huge quantities of fruit.

Since then, I have relaxed my diet a little, I eat a little meat. I don't eat any meat at home, which has been pretty easy during lock down, but now restaurants are open, I do tend to choose a meat option. I tend to snack more at the office (at home I snack on fruit), but for the past 3 months, this has not been an issue. For 2 months, my weight has been hovering around 147. I eat tons of food, I do not restrict quantity. I snack on nuts, dates, dried figs and fruit. I avoid processed food (other than cheese), in my opinion most highly processed food is bad for you, processed vegan food is just as bad as processed meat based. I eat hardly any pasta, rice maybe once per week, I eat too much bread, my wife bakes excellent bread and it is simply too tempting, I eat a large pizza once per week, and I eat too much chocolate.... I live in Switzerland, which is really bad place to be for a chocolate lover. I do not fast, I do not count calories, I do not go hungry

A year ago I could not dream of getting near this weight, in fact 155 seemed like and impossible challenge. There is no magic bullet and no fad diet that will result in sustained weight loss and sustained sporting achievement. However, my advice would be to cut processed food and reduce empty carbs (white bread, pasta etc), and see how it affects you
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think a customized diet plan is necessary for achieving any fitness goal. Eating a food without proper way can not show results, both workout and diet plan plays a major role in achieving any desired weight.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [Tom_hampton] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Such as eating breakfast, lunch and dinner on a daily basis?
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mattsurf] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattsurf wrote:
There is no magic bullet and no fad diet that will result in sustained weight loss and sustained sporting achievement. However, my advice would be to cut processed food and reduce empty carbs (white bread, pasta etc), and see how it affects you

You might have contradicted yourself there. :)

Your experience is similar to mine, and I agree about the processed food bit.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mattsurf] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mattsurf wrote:
I am now 48 and 5'8'' and weigh 147, its the lightest I have been since the age of 15
When I was 42, I weighed 210. Working on the corporate treadmill, young kids, and a love of food all had a pretty big toll on my weight
I started Triathlons when I was 42, and got myself into shape. I started to watch what I ate, but did not diet specifically. Stopped snacking, when on business trips I skipped starter and desert at the restaurant. Combined with increase in exercise, weight dropped to 175 relatively easily.

I then got stuck at 175. At this time I was becoming quite good at triathlons, with the occasional AG podium in local races. I was also making the step up to 70.3 and Ironman distance. With an increase in training load (about 7 hours per week) I started to take my diet more seriously, reducing Pasta and bread, and eating more fruit. I got my weight down to 165. For the next couple of years my weight fluctuated between 160 and 175. Around Christmas I would be at 175, and lose it pretty easily in Jan and Feb, but no matter what I did, no matter how much I was training I could not get below 160. I was now training an average of 11 hours per week, I qualified for the 70.3 worlds in Nice and represented Switzerland at the ITU final in Lausanne, and brought my 70.3 time to under 4:30 and Ironman time to just over 10hrs

This brings me up to this year. Unlike the previous 4 years, I maintained a much better weight over Christmas, and didn't go above 165. As 2020 was supposed to be the year I qualify for Kona, I also ramped my training to 15 hours per week. At the same time, I gave up eating meat in January, and decided to carry on through to March. My diet was mainly whole food, plant based, with huge quantities of fruit.

Since then, I have relaxed my diet a little, I eat a little meat. I don't eat any meat at home, which has been pretty easy during lock down, but now restaurants are open, I do tend to choose a meat option. I tend to snack more at the office (at home I snack on fruit), but for the past 3 months, this has not been an issue. For 2 months, my weight has been hovering around 147. I eat tons of food, I do not restrict quantity. I snack on nuts, dates, dried figs and fruit. I avoid processed food (other than cheese), in my opinion most highly processed food is bad for you, processed vegan food is just as bad as processed meat based. I eat hardly any pasta, rice maybe once per week, I eat too much bread, my wife bakes excellent bread and it is simply too tempting, I eat a large pizza once per week, and I eat too much chocolate.... I live in Switzerland, which is really bad place to be for a chocolate lover. I do not fast, I do not count calories, I do not go hungry

A year ago I could not dream of getting near this weight, in fact 155 seemed like and impossible challenge. There is no magic bullet and no fad diet that will result in sustained weight loss and sustained sporting achievement. However, my advice would be to cut processed food and reduce empty carbs (white bread, pasta etc), and see how it affects you

We're nearly identical in diet and close in weight. I've been as low as 145lbs, but I'm currently 156lbs this morning. I've cut out most meat to about once a week. It seems to just accumulate in my gut and weighs me down. Meat and water weight are a killer for me I've found. I can put on 5lbs very quickly as I was 151lbs three days ago. We ate Chinese on Friday night and it's been like a brick to the gut. The meat, carbs, sodium, and preservatives are not helpful for the GI tract. I used to count calories, but realized if I stick to vegetables, fruits, oats, wild rice, quinoa, etc. then there really doesn't need to be limits. Just eat until I'm satisfied. It's very simple, but not easy because of temptation. The food industry is so upside down with people thinking there is anything normal about the typical American diet. My biggest vices right now are telling myself I deserve something. Those would be sugar free ice cream or worse smores cereal (130 cals for 3/4 cup), but loaded with sodium (220mg) and sugar (13g). Nobody stops at one bowl. Lmao! I also like dark chocolate chips. I need to quit yo-yo'ing and dial it in. It comes down to sticking strictly to whole foods and having discipline.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [ecce-homo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ecce-homo wrote:
Such as eating breakfast, lunch and dinner on a daily basis?

Yes, exactly. You clearly have a solid grasp on the concepts of rigid and controlled.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [mwanner13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mwanner13 wrote:
mattsurf wrote:
I am now 48 and 5'8'' and weigh 147, its the lightest I have been since the age of 15
When I was 42, I weighed 210. Working on the corporate treadmill, young kids, and a love of food all had a pretty big toll on my weight
I started Triathlons when I was 42, and got myself into shape. I started to watch what I ate, but did not diet specifically. Stopped snacking, when on business trips I skipped starter and desert at the restaurant. Combined with increase in exercise, weight dropped to 175 relatively easily.

I then got stuck at 175. At this time I was becoming quite good at triathlons, with the occasional AG podium in local races. I was also making the step up to 70.3 and Ironman distance. With an increase in training load (about 7 hours per week) I started to take my diet more seriously, reducing Pasta and bread, and eating more fruit. I got my weight down to 165. For the next couple of years my weight fluctuated between 160 and 175. Around Christmas I would be at 175, and lose it pretty easily in Jan and Feb, but no matter what I did, no matter how much I was training I could not get below 160. I was now training an average of 11 hours per week, I qualified for the 70.3 worlds in Nice and represented Switzerland at the ITU final in Lausanne, and brought my 70.3 time to under 4:30 and Ironman time to just over 10hrs

This brings me up to this year. Unlike the previous 4 years, I maintained a much better weight over Christmas, and didn't go above 165. As 2020 was supposed to be the year I qualify for Kona, I also ramped my training to 15 hours per week. At the same time, I gave up eating meat in January, and decided to carry on through to March. My diet was mainly whole food, plant based, with huge quantities of fruit.

Since then, I have relaxed my diet a little, I eat a little meat. I don't eat any meat at home, which has been pretty easy during lock down, but now restaurants are open, I do tend to choose a meat option. I tend to snack more at the office (at home I snack on fruit), but for the past 3 months, this has not been an issue. For 2 months, my weight has been hovering around 147. I eat tons of food, I do not restrict quantity. I snack on nuts, dates, dried figs and fruit. I avoid processed food (other than cheese), in my opinion most highly processed food is bad for you, processed vegan food is just as bad as processed meat based. I eat hardly any pasta, rice maybe once per week, I eat too much bread, my wife bakes excellent bread and it is simply too tempting, I eat a large pizza once per week, and I eat too much chocolate.... I live in Switzerland, which is really bad place to be for a chocolate lover. I do not fast, I do not count calories, I do not go hungry

A year ago I could not dream of getting near this weight, in fact 155 seemed like and impossible challenge. There is no magic bullet and no fad diet that will result in sustained weight loss and sustained sporting achievement. However, my advice would be to cut processed food and reduce empty carbs (white bread, pasta etc), and see how it affects you


We're nearly identical in diet and close in weight. I've been as low as 145lbs, but I'm currently 156lbs this morning. I've cut out most meat to about once a week. It seems to just accumulate in my gut and weighs me down. Meat and water weight are a killer for me I've found. I can put on 5lbs very quickly as I was 151lbs three days ago. We ate Chinese on Friday night and it's been like a brick to the gut. The meat, carbs, sodium, and preservatives are not helpful for the GI tract. I used to count calories, but realized if I stick to vegetables, fruits, oats, wild rice, quinoa, etc. then there really doesn't need to be limits. Just eat until I'm satisfied. It's very simple, but not easy because of temptation. The food industry is so upside down with people thinking there is anything normal about the typical American diet. My biggest vices right now are telling myself I deserve something. Those would be sugar free ice cream or worse smores cereal (130 cals for 3/4 cup), but loaded with sodium (220mg) and sugar (13g). Nobody stops at one bowl. Lmao! I also like dark chocolate chips. I need to quit yo-yo'ing and dial it in. It comes down to sticking strictly to whole foods and having discipline.

You two are speaking my language. I was at my lowest weight when I was vegetarian. I added back in shellfish and I hit the 158-162 range. It was when I really added meat back into the diet that I started to pack on the pounds.

Good news is that I have started to track my calories with myfitnesspal and I am down a few pounds on average.

Ironman Lake Placid 2021| 70.3 Worlds St. George 2021
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm right there with you as well. Trying to eliminate sugar has been an eye opener when looking at everything I consume, or I should say eliminate added sugar. Very surprised at how much sugar is added to so many things you wouldn't consider as even having any. Also surprising is how much natural sugar is in certain foods. The key as mentioned is to avoid/eliminate processed foods as much as possible. Why did they make Doritos and Hot Tamales (that chewy cinnamon flavored deliriousness) its just not fair.
Quote Reply
Re: Weight Loss, Gain, & Changing Your Program With Age [MatthewLigman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MatthewLigman wrote:

You two are speaking my language. I was at my lowest weight when I was vegetarian. I added back in shellfish and I hit the 158-162 range. It was when I really added meat back into the diet that I started to pack on the pounds.

Good news is that I have started to track my calories with myfitnesspal and I am down a few pounds on average.

eh could it be the 'added' pounds could be muscle made by addition of protein in diet... bodyfat percentage is better metric than pounds.
Quote Reply