Well...since the subject of this thread is ROAD tubeless applications (i.e. NOT gravel/allroad/mtb, but narrow tires at relatively high pressures), IME you're "overselling" some of the tubeless benefits (and "underselling" latex)
trail wrote:
All the claimed benefits except nearly total protection against pinch flats...
And latex tubes have dramatically lower rates of pinch flatting than when running butyl tubes...so, "the majority of the benefit".
trail wrote:
...ability to plug puncture very quickly in the field...
IME, plugs in road tubeless are a "hit or miss" proposition if they'll work, mostly because of the higher pressures. So, after fiddling around with it and not being able to put full pressure back into it, you're left with a soft tire until you can do a proper repair. If you get a hole large enough to get a plug, you're stopping anyway and putting a tube into a non-tubeless beaded tire will be nearly as fast, and a more effective repair. So again, "the majority of the benefit" (if not more).
trail wrote:
...ability to seal some punctures almost instantly...
And IME those types of punctures are very small, and of the type that latex tubes also tend to "fend off". There's some data on this very website attesting to that ;-) Once again, "the majority of the benefit".
trail wrote:
...and ability to seal most punctures before you're riding on rims.
Punctures in latex tubes are typically VERY slow deflating. They don't instantly deflate like a butyl puncture. Besides, you can also run sealant inside the latex if this (and the point above) are concerns. Yet again, "the majority of the benefit".
trail wrote:
So...basically none of the "claimed" benefits. :)
None?
http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/