>>The way I was reading the other posts was that they should be DQ'd because she is receiving an unfair advantage. I didn't want to see them getting ripped for "obtaining an unfair advantage" when it's pretty obvious (at least to me) based on the info presented that they were not racing or trying to obtain a higher placing.<<
Just to play devil's advocate....
1. They were entered in Ironman NZ, which, the last 3 years when I was there, is a "RACE". If they wanted a nice ride in the NZ countryside, why pay $400US to enter a race?
2. In the very recent past at IM NZ, the Kona slot for certain women's age groups has rolled down to the very LAST woman finisher in that AG (or even out of the AG), therefore, say this woman got the assistance on the bike, made the cutoff and was a decent runner and passed a woman in the AG on the run and finished 14th instead of 15th in the AG. She could claim that Kona spot that rolled all the way down. For reference: One year the slot rolled to the last place finisher in the AG (who finished in 16:15 or so). The year before, it rolled down and out of the AG and back to W30-34.
So there is precedence on how "cheating, but not really cheating" can affect the outcome.
clm
clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Just to play devil's advocate....
1. They were entered in Ironman NZ, which, the last 3 years when I was there, is a "RACE". If they wanted a nice ride in the NZ countryside, why pay $400US to enter a race?
2. In the very recent past at IM NZ, the Kona slot for certain women's age groups has rolled down to the very LAST woman finisher in that AG (or even out of the AG), therefore, say this woman got the assistance on the bike, made the cutoff and was a decent runner and passed a woman in the AG on the run and finished 14th instead of 15th in the AG. She could claim that Kona spot that rolled all the way down. For reference: One year the slot rolled to the last place finisher in the AG (who finished in 16:15 or so). The year before, it rolled down and out of the AG and back to W30-34.
So there is precedence on how "cheating, but not really cheating" can affect the outcome.
clm
clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com