BigBoyND wrote:
Why are we still talking about Kona vs no Kona?
In either camp, we get what we want every other year! Everyone should be celebrating
I think so..
but I would be expectating with three topics
- if Ironman would be able to manage the "variable" demand of more people willing to go to WC when the final is Hawaii, than the odd year (where the demand would be higher for "local athletes").
- I really think that womens WC in Kona would be even more interesting than any men WC everywhere.. but... in 2024, how would be the demand of women WC everywhere in 2024? I really think that Ironman SHALL change many things in the Media coverage (similar than PTO) to be able to mantain the interest in the WC (it is not one but two events in separate dates/separate locations).
- I really expect a HIGH number of roll downs this year, and a high number of deferral to WC2024 in men. And depending in the date even more.... September in Europe would be to early (many people racing in July).
My opinion is that Ironman is doing all their work for increasing the profit in the short term increasing their product cost but also they are decreasing the PRODUCT value and the demand..
I would remember: 2023 WC Slot costs 1600 EUR (It is 1 month salary for many). For many.. we can afford once in life 5000-10000EUR travel... to live a dream. Not so many people to do same effort to race a WC everywhere. If Triathlon would be a sport with strong sponsors.. but it is not.
AH!!! I would remember... they are willing to increase cost, reduce the value and increase the number of athletes... they may thing that demand is infinite, but it is not.