BrentwoodTriGuy wrote:
wintershade wrote:
So the consensus is this race pretty much sucked, eh? Thats too bad..... But would it have sucked if things had gone as planned (i.e., normal swim start)? Non-wetsuit is fine for me. I'm a top 10% swimmer. I'm thinking more just course, course congestion, logistics, support, etc. It's in my backyard, so I was thinking about doing it or Santa Cruz next year. Baby on the way so no more flying to races and dialing things back to 70.3s for A race -- it's hard enough with just tri gear, let alone baby gear.
It definitely would have been better if it went according to plan but I would still boycott the race until they fix the run course. Its hard to actually describe the congestion on the river path without seeing it for yourself. It was like trying to run through a massive crowd standing still at a concert.
I agree, I think the race is very good, the swim looked like it would have been great, the bike course is very scenic and fun but the road conditions are very bad in spots. The run course was great if you had 50% fewer people, at least when I got on it. I left T1 at 8:50 and rode 2:22 so I moved up into the field quite a bit. I ran a 1:33 and literally had to dodge, dice, run sideways beteeen people, it was a challenge to be sure.
-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project